Commentary: Obama administration takes page from Bush playbookBy Edward Wasserman | The Miami Herald
Posted on Friday, July 23, 2010
In at least one area of political life the spirit of bipartisanship is strong, and the Obama administration has picked up pretty much where the Bush team left off.
That's in the realm of information control: treating the news media like a pestilence, using secrecy rules to stem inconvenient disclosures, ducking informed scrutiny in favor of staged encounters, punishing unauthorized leaks vigorously and generally regarding publicly significant information as something officials are entitled to handle as a political resource of their very own.
The media have been slow to face up to this side of the administration. That's partly, I think, because Obama himself is such a lucid and engaging voice and partly because his campaign was so thoroughly media-enabled that it seemed saturated with the religion of accessibility and transparency. Plus, it's because after the arrogant jawboning of Donald Rumsfeld and Dick Cheney, their extravagant secrecy claims and their boss' own inarticulateness, the Bush era seemed an easy act to follow.But? The Obama record is unsettling on a number of counts.
First, high-level press relations. "Is Obama's White House tighter than Bush's?" So asks the current Columbia Journalism Review, which catalogues the vanishing press conferences -- none between July 2009 and May 2010 -- stricter rules on background briefings, reliance on new media where officials fully control their message, even elbowing press photographers aside so that the media must run handouts.