Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Do you remember that story about cops having to arrest some idiot for swimming in the oily gulf?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 07:17 PM
Original message
Do you remember that story about cops having to arrest some idiot for swimming in the oily gulf?
http://www.nola.com/news/gulf-oil-spill/index.ssf/2010/06/man_arrested_for_swimming_in_g.html

There was a little discussion about whether or not the police should interfere with idiots who do stupid crap. I vaguely remembered it until the other day when I went to an environmental forum. The photos were familiar: the white crosses with the names of everything destroyed by the spill, the mural of BP as the grim reaper. There was another in the mix that didn't make sense though. It was a pair of hands in handcuffs. The person who took the pictures happened to be in the room. He's a student who traveled across the gulf to assess the information and capture photos for a political project at Texas A&M. I know him. He's a pretty calm, rational, level headed kind of guy. Definitely not a grandstanding type.

He says he never went near the water. The BP-owned police patrolling the area made up the charge to get him and his camera out of the area. Then AP just came and ran with the cop's story without a thought. He said the whole experience was absurd, and he didn't make a big deal of it. But I remembered the story.

It made me think about how much we argue about this or that "idiots" motivation after reading something in the news. How interesting and sad that we may be arguing about manufactured characters that don't exist and situations that never occurred.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Some of the M$M here will eventually be as bad as the cold war Russian propaganda. n/t
Edited on Tue Jul-20-10 07:21 PM by RKP5637
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 07:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Correction, it already is
FOX News <---------- evidence A
CNN <--------------- Evidence B
And yes at times MSNBC

And don't get me started with some of the wire services....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yep, agree. I was thinking that, but gave them some wiggle room. Bad move on
my part. Years ago I used to listen to Radio Moscow on shortwave and now I hear a similar version here. FOX News is certainly a good example of propaganda that never stops...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 07:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Me too, and you perhaps remember
when Perestroyka came. YOU COULD taste it... in the stories and how they were written.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. At that stage I had taken to listening to the TV. I do miss the old powerful transoceanic
shortwave broadcasts. There was always something magical in tuning them in...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 07:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I actually trust Pravda more than the New York Times about some things.
Not 100%, but maybe 20% more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RKP5637 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 07:50 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I have some friends that rely on NYT for everything, I've often cautioned
them not to use one news source as the absolute truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
readmoreoften Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-20-10 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. My guess is that it's less maliciousness on APs part and more bad and lazy reporting.
Small-time AP reporters barely make a living. They get the bare bones info and blab it. Very little investigating going on anymore. This is a trend I've seen when I've been around AP reporters interviewing the antiwar movement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC