Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

True or False: Anytime one suggests that any one branch

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-10 06:13 PM
Original message
True or False: Anytime one suggests that any one branch
of the US government is all powerful or all responsible for a direction/ result of the government as a whole, there is a flaw in one's reasoning.

True or False?

For further study: Can the same answer be applied to one person or one party in the government?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-10 06:16 PM
Response to Original message
1. True on the first question...
The second is not so easy... as much as I think we blame on Bush, I think that people (here at least) understand that there were many puppeteers during that bloody, evil show.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-19-10 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. all powerful and all responsible are two different things.
Edited on Mon Jul-19-10 06:38 PM by Ozymanithrax
No branch of the government is all powerful. We have three, coequal branches of government.

And all responsible: Each branch has specific named powers. Power not given to the branches of government are held by the states. There are checks and balances on those powers. The checks and balances are limits on powers but do not necessarily spread the responsibility.

The President is all responsible for foreign relations, but his power is checked by the Legislative Branch in two ways. (1) All treaties must be approved by Legislative branch. (2) If the President wants to spend money pursuant to foreign diplomacy, Congress must raise those funds. But the President can still act as if a treaty was signed by the Senate, even if they refuse to approve it. So if the President negotiates a treaty, the Senate refuses to sign it, but the President follows the treaty requirements, how is responsibility split.

Only the Congress can declare war. However the President, as Commander and Chief responsible for defense and head of the armed forces, can and has ordered troops into armed conflict without congressional agreement.

I don't think the simplicity of the question fits the reality of the situation.

But if they are all responsible, then even those that oppose a policy and vote against it, are still responsible. So when the President and Congress take us into a war that we do not approve, everyone is Responsible, and since the power is derived from us, every citizen is responsible for each death.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC