|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-10 05:15 PM Original message |
about about a test for all pols to prove they are human when running for office? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-10 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
1. Not sure that wouldnt trigger..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HillbillyBob (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-10 05:19 PM Response to Original message |
2. I move for pshyco evals for every one down to and including |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-10 05:22 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. after the eagleton mess, I thought that every person running for the presidency should have to pass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-10 05:30 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. "... the very act of wanting the office proves one is nuts." There's a lot of truth in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-10 09:52 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. I think there needs to be a psychological profile of anyone who runs for the presidency |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KansDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-10 05:22 PM Response to Original message |
4. Yeah! Make them take a urine test. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-10 05:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Yeah and with the R's it would be pretty easy to get a sample, they're always pissing on someone. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-10 05:34 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. or, in the case of vitter.,.,. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-10 05:41 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Yep!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-10 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
8. That and an IQ test. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RKP5637 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-10 05:45 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Yep, I actually think some of these should be looked at for the 21st century. We |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
niyad (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-10 06:00 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. absolutely. I don't want "average schmuck" -- I want someone wayyyy smarter than I am. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jenny_D (28 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Jul-19-10 07:08 PM Response to Original message |
12. They should have to pass a psych evaluation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC