Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Biggest Medicare fraud bust did NOT occur yesterday. It was on fmr Sen Bill Frist's family business

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 11:39 PM
Original message
Biggest Medicare fraud bust did NOT occur yesterday. It was on fmr Sen Bill Frist's family business
Let it be known that I'm in favor of busting folks that defraud Medicare. Big folks, and as BP would say, small persons. I applaud the actions taken on Friday.

Remember Bill Frist?

Republican leader of the US Senate and heart surgeon specializing in remote diagnostics?

The MSM has pronounced Friday's news item as the biggest bust in the history of Medicare. The headlines are everywhere, even in LBN here at DU. $251 million, biggest bust EVER.

$1.7 FUCKINGBILLION ... Isn't that bigger than $251 million? ... Maybe almost 7 times bigger?

Check it out ...

http://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/2003/June/03_civ_386.htm

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
THURSDAY, JUNE 26, 2003
WWW.USDOJ.GOV
CIV
(202) 514-2007
TDD (202) 514-1888
LARGEST HEALTH CARE FRAUD CASE IN U.S. HISTORY SETTLED
HCA INVESTIGATION NETS RECORD TOTAL OF $1.7 BILLION


WASHINGTON, D.C. - HCA Inc. (formerly known as Columbia/HCA and HCA - The Healthcare Company) has agreed to pay the United States $631 million in civil penalties and damages arising from false claims the government alleged it submitted to Medicare and other federal health programs, the Justice Department announced today.

This settlement marks the conclusion of the most comprehensive health care fraud investigation ever undertaken by the Justice Department, working with the Departments of Health and Human Services and Defense, the Office of Personnel Management and the states. The settlement announced today resolves HCA's civil liability for false claims resulting from a variety of allegedly unlawful practices, including cost report fraud and the payment of kickbacks to physicians.

Previously, on December 14, 2000, HCA subsidiaries pled guilty to substantial criminal conduct and paid more than $840 million in criminal fines, civil restitution and penalties. Combined with today's separate administrative settlement with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), under which HCA will pay an additional $250 million to resolve overpayment claims arising from certain of its cost reporting practices, the government will have recovered $1.7 billion from HCA, by far the largest recovery ever reached by the government in a health care fraud investigation.

"Health care providers and professionals hold a public trust, and when that trust is violated by fraud and abuse of program funds, and by the payment of kickbacks to the physicians on whom patients and the programs rely for uncompromised medical judgment, health care for all Americans suffers," Robert D. McCallum, Jr., Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division said. "This settlement brings to a close the largest multi-agency investigation of a health care provider that the United States government has ever undertaken and demonstrates the Department of Justice's ongoing resolve and commitment to pursue all types of fraud on American taxpayers, and health care program beneficiaries."

"Let this case be a continuing reminder to all that in the fight against health care fraud this office will not be deterred," said Acting Principal Deputy Inspector General Dara Corrigan. “Medicare dollars paid to provide ever more expensive health care services to the country's taxpayers should never be fraudulently diverted. This is our job and our trust and we take these duties very seriously," Corrigan concluded.

This latest settlement resolves fraud allegations against HCA and HCA hospitals in nine False Claims Act qui tam or whistleblower lawsuits pending in federal court in the District of Columbia. Under the federal False Claims Act, private individuals may file suit on behalf of the United States and, if the case is successful, may recover a share of the proceeds for their efforts. Under the settlement, the whistleblowers will receive a combined share of $151,591,500, the highest combined qui tam award ever paid out by the government.

"We are grateful for the assistance given by the whistleblowers over the course of the past nine years of investigation and litigation,” McCallum said. “And we are proud of the work of government personnel as well as counsel for the whistleblowers, who together pursued these matters through investigation and strenuous litigation. This result demonstrates the commitment of the Department to the qui tam statute and that the statute works as Congress intended."

Under the first of three agreements announced today, which becomes effective upon the court's dismissal of the lawsuits, HCA will pay nearly $620 million to resolve eight whistleblower lawsuits in which the government had intervened alleging that HCA systematically defrauded Medicare, Medicaid and other federally funded health care programs through schemes dating back to the late 1980s. HCA will pay an additional $11 million to resolve separate allegations of improper HCA billing practices.

The settlement requires HCA to pay:

$356 million to resolve whistleblower lawsuits alleging that HCA engaged in a series of schemes to defraud Medicare, Medicaid and TRICARE, the military’s health care program, through hospital cost reports, the year end claims submitted by hospitals to the government to reconcile payments received throughout the year with amounts they claim are actually owed. In 2001, a subsidiary of Nashville-based HCA, Columbia Management Companies, Inc., pled guilty in the Middle District of Florida to related charges on eight counts of making false statements to the United States and paid $22.6 million in criminal fines. An additional amount of $20 million of the settlement is being paid toward a resolution of cost reporting fraud allegations pursued separately by James Alderson and John Schilling, the relators who filed the lawsuits. In total, the two relators are to receive a total of $100 million as their statutory share of the settlement.

$225.5 million to resolve lawsuits alleging that HCA hospitals and home health agencies unlawfully billed Medicare, Medicaid and TRICARE for claims generated by the payment of kickbacks and other illegal remuneration to physicians in exchange for referral of patients. In 2001, Columbia Management Companies, Inc., pled guilty to one count of conspiracy to pay kickbacks and other monetary benefits to doctors in violation of the Medicare Antikickback Statute and paid a $30 million criminal fine. Dr. James Thompson, a doctor who filed suit against the company in 1995, will receive $41.5 million as his statutory share of the settlement. Gary King, a former HCA employee, will receive $5 million and Ann Mroz, a former HCA nurse, will receive a share of $837,500.

$17 million to resolve allegations that certain company-owned hospitals billed Medicare for unallowable costs incurred by a contractor that operated HCA wound care centers, and for a non-covered drug that the contractor manufactured and sold to hospital patients. The 2001 Columbia Management Companies' guilty plea concerning cost report fraud included a charge related to wound care center costs. HCA's wound care center management contractor, Curative Healthcare Services, Inc., previously paid $16.5 million to resolve related allegations pending at one time in these same lawsuits. Joseph "Mickey" Parslow, a former HCA financial officer, will receive $2,990,000 and Francesco Lanni, a former Reimbursement Manager at the Wound Care Center at New York Methodist Hospital in Brooklyn, New York, will receive a share of $680,000.

$5 million to resolve allegations concerning the transfer of patients from HCA facilities to other facilities and the claiming of excessive costs for those transfers.

$5 million to resolve allegations that HCA's Lawnwood Regional Medical Center in Fort Pierce, Florida submitted false claims in Medicare cost reports by inflating its entitlement to funds to treat indigent patients and by shifting employee salary costs in order to increase its reimbursement from the federal health care program.

$950,000 to settle allegations made by Michael Marine that HCA improperly shifted its home office costs to hospitals. Marine will receive a share of $116,500.

Today's settlement agreement incorporates the terms of a Corporate Integrity Agreement executed by HCA and the Office of the Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services in December 2000 that obligated the company to engage in significant and comprehensive compliance efforts into 2009.

In a separate agreement, HCA agreed to pay $1.5 million to resolve allegations that an Atlanta, Georgia hospital, West Paces Medical Center, paid kickbacks for the referral of diabetes patients. Those allegations had been pursued since 1996 by a whistleblower in a case in which the United States had declined to intervene, captioned U.S. ex rel. Pogue v. American Healthcorp, Inc. et al.. Pogue, a former employee of a co-defendant in the case, Diabetes Treatment Centers of America, will receive a share of $405,000 from the HCA settlement. Pogue continues to litigate claims against his former employer and a group of Atlanta physicians.

Additionally, a state negotiating team appointed by the National Association of Medicaid Fraud Control Units has reached agreement with HCA to resolve related issues with affected state Medicaid plans for $17.5 million, representing direct state losses. The terms of that agreement are being finalized by the parties and are not part of today's settlement.

Today's administrative agreement between HCA and CMS will require HCA to pay CMS $250 million in order to resolve claims they maintained against each other arising from HCA's hospital cost reports and home office cost statements for cost reporting periods ending July 31, 2001. These claims resulted from HCA cost reports that were not processed since 1997 as a result of the government's investigation.

###

03-386
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 12:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. You rock for posting this. Thank you. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CherokeeDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 12:28 AM
Response to Original message
2. I Worked for HCA
I worked at an HCA hosp in south Florida, it was actually a very good hospital...Miami-Dade Fire Rescue liked it's ER better than any other in town...but once a year, every employee had to go through a ethics course because of the antics of dear Dr. Frist and his family. I believe the classes had to be give for a minimum of eight years. Last time I looked, we hadn't done anything to warrant that class. Hang out with sleaze, you pay!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heddi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
13. I work at an HCA facility in Western Florida...and we're still doing those fucking ethics classes
this time we did 2 in six months. Over 20 hours of "education". Yanno, I don't think the CEO and COO and CNO have to take these classses,but I do, twice a year. I didn't bilk anyone's medicaid...I don't even give a shit what insurance someone has i'm going to treat them the same regardless.

I spent about as much time on mandatory ethics education last year as I did on mandatory nursing education. It's bullshit. The workers are being punished because the big wigs fucked up.

Oh and someone high up must have been touching alot of secretary's butts because we had like 30 hours of education on "positive work environments"...i.e. don't touch secretaries butt's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 08:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. Didn't have all the details you did BUT
I posted that as a reply on one of the messages yesterday. And he didn't get nothin' done to him. He came up with Cheney's reply that his stock was in a "blind trust". HE DIDN'T KNOW THAT HE WAS HELPING TO FUND HIS FAMILY BUSINESS. Trustful souls wasn't the republican senate back then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RockaFowler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. Isn't Rick Scott involved in this, too??
He's running for Governor of Florida. Just what we need here!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 09:20 AM
Response to Original message
5. When I hired on with HCA several years ago, they gave this excuse
Edited on Sat Jul-17-10 09:22 AM by rainbow4321
The fraud REALLY was not fraud, it all started because someone "made a typo in the El Paso office...". Uh-huh, a billion dollar typo, right?
Then sitting thru those damn goofy ethic videos with those awful "actors" playing healthcare workers. Year after year after year. I always thought, you know, it was not the people in the trenches who did the fraud, it was the execs, are THEY having to wacth these, also??
Left the HCA system a few years ago and I sure as hell don't miss their system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 09:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. They are so full of it. That fraud was ongoing for years. I worked for them at the time...
they were perpetrating it. As a lowly nurse, I had no knowledge but it was a history of all kinds of fraud like unbundling lab tests and charging individually for each one. For instance, they would take an electrolytes test, generally known as a Chem 7, and charge each of the 7 chemistries as a separate test. This was one of the biggest issues for which they were found guilty.

For years after I left there, I had attorneys contacting me from insurance companies asking if I was privy to any information. Of course, I wasn't. All I could speak to was it was the same years they were driving the nurse/patient ratios up to dangerous levels and buying the cheapest supplies they could find for us to work with. Every had an IV started with a dull needle? Trust me, you don't wanna try it.

A typo? :rofl:

Seems they haven't changed their stripes much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rainbow4321 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I called the state on them because of the nurse/pt ratio
I worked on their tele/ICU stepdown floor and they kept bumping up the ratio from 1:4, to 1:5, and then they were leaving it at 1:6. Even though they promised to give us aides when they bumped us up to the 1:5, that lasted about a month and then we lost them.

So at 1:6, I called the state. I was kinda impressed by the state's response. They didn't just send a letter or a make a phone call. They showed up at the hospital, specifically telling the brass that they were there to address the ratio on my floor.
After that, they bumped us back "down" to 1:5.

The county hospital I work for now is not much better with the lowest bidder supplies. We had a batch of needles for a while that would literally BOUNCE of patients' arms when we would try to give an IM shot in the arm. Same technique with the better needles that we HAD been using and everything was fine. Then they switched suppliers and the bouncing started. First I thought it was ME until I mentioned to the other nurses and they started reporting the same thing.
I know when I worked for HCA, we had it drilled into us about taking stuff from the supply room..you took so much as a small tissue box and it was chargeable. Felt like telling the pts to just use the toilet paper in their bathroom, same gross texture but least it wouldn't lead to extra charges.

My HCA hospital went for magnet status (even though my floor alone literally had an 80% nurse turnover rate that year)..they brought all the Filipino nurses into a big breakfast with the Magnet officials and had them tell the officials everything the hospital had done for them when the hospital brought them over to work in the US (our hospital). Help them set up bank accounts, found apartments for them near all the other nurses/families that the hospital had brought over, got their kids into school, etc...
Magnet people were just in awe and gave the hospital a glowing report.

You would think the magnet people would go "sooo, why do you have to go overseas to get nurses, why are the locals not applying and STAYING"?? Nope. Not once. The number of staff nurses who were brought over was huge because the local nurses were leaving in droves.

Yet HCA still go their magnet status.


Go into that hospital for one small thing and they call in 5 different specialists to be part of your doctor team, whether you need them or not. Cardiac, GI, neuro, infectious disease. All of whom maybe swing by for 5 minutes, don't go into the room and just ask the nurse "how's it going" and then they leave. But the pt's insurance or Medicare gets billed.
Go in without any insurance, you are outta there within a day, no specialists, nothing.

They had to start laying off nurses because other bigger, sparkly new hospitals opened up within the immediate area and docs (with their pts) left our facility for bigger/better promi$es. Ours was a 30+ year old building that any "upgrades" they did was like putting lipstick on a pig. They woulda been better off just building a new facility with all the money they were putting into the fixing ups they were doing.

Guess the bean counters finally realized how bad it was getting cuz shortly after this rapid decline, the CEO who was there for 30 yrs "retired". Think it came down not because of staff layoffs or unhappy staff but because they were losing money left and right and had bottomed out in their daily census, especially their cash cow area of OB/nursery/neonatal ICU after the OB docs went to the newer facilities.

I lasted there 8 years, saw so many coming/goings and politics. I left and never looked back. Wouldn't step foot in another HCA facility again




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eilen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. I worked in an HCA hospital as well-- for 2 months
It was scary. I left because I didn't want to end up in a lawsuit. They had a robot in the pharmacy but couldn't get decent IV pumps so we had to run blood via gravity. The pharmacists hired were incompetent. There was no way to verify drug compatibilities of the newest drugs as their intranet was outdated and nurses were not allowed to access internet sources and the pharmacists didn't know anything. They sent up the wrong chemotherapy. The ratios were ungodly. Our unit had to get an emergency ethics committee convened to get a lady with newly diagnosed ALL apheresis -- which they denied her initially d/t no insurance. The doctors had their clinic nurses answer call at night. I didn't like taking doctor orders from another nurse who was no more qualified than I to give orders. I was really shocked to find that this was allowed in the hospital policies. I can't imagine it stands up in court.

But really pretty lobby. I couldn't quit fast enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. +1 nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. Well, they're consistent, anyway.
Sounds like the asshole company I worked for. I was at a facility in Houston charging the night shift on the Oncology and BMT Unit. They had us staffed so my oncology nurses would be taking 10 (yes, 10) patients. I got called in by my supervisor because I would assign myself a patient load of 5 or 6 to get the ratios down some. Her position was that my charge responsibilities should take precedent. Unable to point to any instances where either my charge duties or my patient care had suffered, she had to back down. I, essentially, told her that as long as I could do anything about it, there would not be any oncology nurses taking 10 patients on a shift I worked. She didn't like it but she had not a leg to stand on.

I worked for them for 4 years. Left in 1995 and became a Hospice nurse. Have not stepped foot in another hospital to work since.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 09:28 AM
Response to Original message
6. K&R! //nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scurrilous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. K & R
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
immune Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
10. Its going to take hundreds of such busts
and maybe more to bring the medical fraudsters down. It doesn't matter much to me which is biggest or smallest. Just get 'em all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC