Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Screws tighten on Musharraf..."..Be VERY afraid of this issue

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 01:09 AM
Original message
"Screws tighten on Musharraf..."..Be VERY afraid of this issue
http://www.kuwaittimes.net/read_news.php?newsid=NzA1MjY0ODcx

Analysis
Screws tighten on Musharraf amid judge's rise

Published Date: May 12, 2007
By Nick Allen

With the rapid elevation in recent weeks of Pakistan's suspended chief justice to a national symbol of resistance to the government, President Pervez Musharraf's room to manoeuvre in the crisis is diminishing at the same rate.

Just six months before the army general plans to seek re-election by the current parliament, a wide range of forces have joined the lawyers' movement in support of Iftikhar Chaudhry, who Musharraf suspended on March 9 for alleged abuse of office. What began as an outcry by lawyers seeking to defend the independence of the judiciary has evolved into the potent challenge to military rule, with pro-Chaudhry events resounding to battle cry chants of "Go Musharraf go."

Frequent rallies and protests at the judge's suspension are attended by opposition supporters, members of rights groups and women's organizations, and flocks of citizens who grew disillusioned with Musharraf since he came to power in a bloodless coup in 1999.

Against this backdrop, the president's repeated warnings not to politicize "a purely legal and constitutional matter" sound increasingly removed from reality. "The schemes of the lawyers are bound to fail since the public is not with them but with me at this rally. The public is not interested in politics, but in development," Musharraf told a few thousand supporters in southern Pakistan last Friday

snip
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
1. Hate To Say It But Musharraf's Support For The Bush Regime's
fiasco will cost him big time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 01:18 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. and Pakistan just happens to be where the Taliban & AlQaeda are haning out
and of course the issues with India are not resolved.. and they are both "noo-Que-lur" nations..

Wouldn't AlQ and/or the Taliban love to get their hands on the controls of government..and those nukes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lligrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 01:29 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Yep, Unfortunately Musharraf Won't Be The Only One
paying for this administration's fiascos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 05:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. More complicated than that... the political alternatives are pretty well-known for corruption
and past criminal acts while in-power.

The only thing that is certain is uncertainty for the moment in Pakistan.


Ultimately, whoever the military backs will win out... same as it ever was.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IChing Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 01:16 AM
Response to Original message
2. They have nukes and missiles and were involved with 911
Edited on Sun May-13-07 01:25 AM by IChing
they were not a democracy but we supported the military
leader in his coup and gave money to play our
game of war and power, thinking he survive?........Who is "we"?

That an't what Washington said on in his farewell speech on
no entangling alliances.

Oh course Exxon, General Motors and Halliburtion were not around in those times.

I worried about this countries ties as much as Saudi Arabia
but America is tied by corporate power in their foreign policy
not democratic, intellectual or even common sense power
that serves their citizens first and then the world


Yeah, it scares me his government might fall and they
really have the nuke.

Look at Pakistani involvement in 911
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. Is Wolfowitz's buddy from Citibank, Aziz, still the PM in Pakistan?
fucking neocons have their fingers EVERYWHERE!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 01:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. india has more to worry about this than we do at this time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
7. With human rights and womens rights organizations...
...being some of the prime movers in the resistence, somehow I don't see Pakistan becoming, if they succeed, an insta-Taliban nation. Though if Musharref, with his Washington/Bush support, has to "crack down" to put down this resistence, it may. Musharref has been more a freind to alQueda than this resistence seems to be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 04:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. In other news Musharraf's toupe is seeking political asylum in Miami.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. There's Only So Much Use For A Useful Fool
While booooshie didn't know who Musharaf was during the 2000 election campaign, he sure did after 9/11...and Musharaf knew a sucker and a "relationship" was born. Musharaf gave booooshie cover for his "war on terror"...making it appear he was an ally and keeping his dogs on a leash while he doled out billions of dollars to buy their loyalty. It worked good as long as the grease didn't get messed up...as long as the money flowed that all that counted. Who cared if that money worked its way to the tribal areas and probably right into Al Queda coffers...or if Musharaf was hiding the truth about Dr. Ayub Khan and his true WMD program...it was all good.

The question this unrest brings is "has Musharaf used up his usefulness". Will the military...seeing the evenutal US fall in Iraq and "bug-out" of the region try to up the ante on the US...get even more money in a last grab and when he's no longer useful, Musharaf will be gone. Another great member of the "coalition of the willing", about to have his ticket punched.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
11. i'm surprised Musharraf is still alive. that fact that he is is credible evidence that
while publicly supporting bushco for american media consumption, in his 'hood his real allegiences are elsewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 07:44 AM
Response to Original message
12. This has been coming for some time
Musharraf is history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-13-07 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Will the "next" general be as accommodating to the US?
My guess is no :scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC