Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

RIAA paid its lawyers more than $16,000,000 in 2008 to recover only $391,000

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 08:31 AM
Original message
RIAA paid its lawyers more than $16,000,000 in 2008 to recover only $391,000
Ha ha ha ha ha. RIAA paid its lawyers more than $16,000,000 in 2008 to recover only $391,000!!!

Big hat tip to my friend Jon Newton at p2pnet.net for uncovering these documents.

The RIAA's "business plan" is even worse than I'd guessed it was.

The RIAA paid Holmes Roberts & Owen $9,364,901 in 2008, Jenner & Block more than $7,000,000, and Cravath Swain & Moore $1.25 million, to pursue its "copyright infringement" claims, in order to recover a mere $391,000.

Embarrassing.

If the average settlement were $3,900, that would mean 100 settlements for the entire year.

As bad as it was, I guess it was better than the numbers for 2007, in which more than $21 million was spent on legal fees, and $3.5 million on "investigative operations" ... presumably MediaSentry. And the amount recovered was $515,929.

And 2006 was similar: they spent more than $19,000,000 in legal fees and more than $3,600,000 in "investigative operations" expenses to recover $455,000.

http://recordingindustryvspeople.blogspot.com/2010/07/ha-ha-ha-ha-ha-riaa-paid-its-lawyers.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Sherman A1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
1. Time for "the boys" to do a little
cost v benefit analysis on the program... I wonder how long they can afford these wonderful legal victories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
2. Hard to collect from teens.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. I doubt they ever intended to make more than the lawsuits cost.
They see it as a way to influence public behavior, and cause people to reconsider using p2p.

To a certain degree, they succeeded. But by that same token, their actions prompted new services like btguard. It'll always be an electronic arms race; too many people are too used to being able to go download whatever they want with limited risk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HughMoran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 09:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Yep
It's a 'deterrent'.

But, as you said, it just makes those into getting what they want without paying all the more determined.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 09:52 AM
Response to Original message
5. It was worth it to them.
They sent a lot of the more casual sharers running scared. It didn't stop the problem but, from their point of view, it limited the size of the problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
6. Free is the ultimate Cheap.
It even beats Walmart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-16-10 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. Too Big To Succede...
When historians look back on the implosion of the recording industry, the RIAA's stupidity, greed and ineptness will be a major cause. Instead of adapting to technical changes its fought them and lost big time. They alienated a generation of customers...the lifeline to their survival and then severed ties with radio and television that used to draw attention and sell their music. The more they fight the behinder they get as the days of buying CDs get replaced by downloads and anyone can produce music and distribute it without going through the controls of a record company. The downside is the loss of quality over quantity but the marketplace rules and the RIAA and record companies have come up snake eyes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 02:45 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC