Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Gulf Seafood Gets Chemically Tested for Oil, Not Dispersant

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:00 AM
Original message
Gulf Seafood Gets Chemically Tested for Oil, Not Dispersant

http://www.propublica.org/blog/item/gulf-seafood-gets-chemically-tested-for-oil-not-dispersant


NOAA, the FDA and the Gulf states have been rigorously testing <1> Gulf seafood for oil—doing smell tests <2> with teams of human sniffers, and performing chemical tests for the harmful polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs, found naturally in crude oil.

But they’re not chemically testing—at least, not yet—for the presence of oil dispersant. BP has thus far applied more than 1.7 million gallons <3> of one chemical dispersant, Corexit, to the Gulf. (The lack of dispersant testing for seafood has been mentioned by The Palm Beach Post <4> and CNN <5>, but we first noticed toward the end of this Los Angeles Times piece <6>.)

Both the FDA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration say that dispersant in seafood isn’t the primary concern—it’s oil, because the oil is more likely to be found in the flesh of the fish. Teams of scientists--whose noses are believed to be sensitive enough to sniff out oil--are also trained to detect the smell of dispersant, but the chemical testing is limited to crude oil hydrocarbons.

“There is, however, work being done here to develop testing for dispersant. That’s ongoing,” said Monica Allen, a spokeswoman with the National Marine Fisheries Service, a division of NOAA.
-snip-
---------------------------


is this still 2010? the best we can do is a nose? and "ongoing". how long is ongoing? our scientists can't think fast?

is any of this believable?

and why the hell isn't the govt. advising pregnant women and children to leave the toxic areas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FirstLight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:12 AM
Response to Original message
1. just WRONG...
there's no excuse for the lack of real testing and health safety measures...


I fear we will be seeing the ramifications for decades to come (if we last that long)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. if we last it will be without eating anything that comes out of the Gulf


nobody wants me to say that but what is, is.

the dispersements have made small bits of oil go everywhere. spread out everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FirstLight Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
3. wish i could K&R +10000!
WHERE is the real reporting? and true, why are there not being warnings issued for elderly, children and pregnant women?

...and how do we know where something is fished from? Honestly, I was never a big seafood eater, but that's IT for me. I used to love shrimp too, but don;t trust it now, even if it is Gorton's frozen crap. nope.

I guess I can trust a trout I pull out of the Lake myself up here in the Sierras...but wait, did you know the higs sierras fish have been tested and found HIGHER levels of mercury? But there's no Fish & Game notice to warn us....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
4. That's a rather nice sourced article
all your questions are basically answered in the links within it. I enjoy the last line best.

that said, there’s no need for hysteria but it’s good to be aware of unanswered questions
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ensho Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 09:57 AM
Response to Original message
5. I'm bringing this thread back to pg. 1 as I'm still outraged at the nose test


I wish some background info could be brought up on all this.

how many inspectors have been taught the nose test?

how long in minutes can a nose do this work before it breaks down? we know dogs noses need a rest.

where are these seafood checking stations? how many are there?

who OKed the nose test?

this all sounds like a big scam and its the Gulf seafood eaters that get the short end of the stick and the illness and possible death.

and back to the pregnant women and children warning. where is the govt. on this? pregnant women and children should not be living in this toxic mess and hope to stay well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jul-17-10 10:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. I was at a Japanese restaurant the other day, and on the menu...
all the shrimp dishes were described as "Gulf Shrimp". I made a comment on it, then my mother in law asked the waitress if the shrimp still came from the Gulf and if it was okay to eat. The waitress said it was "supplier certified" and acted like it was the most ridiculous thing she ever heard of to even ask that question. Needless to say, nobody ordered the shrimp.

A few minutes later we hear another table ask the same question, and the waitress had the same reaction.

WTF is up with people acting so arrogantly when people bring up legitimate concerns? I guess the restaurant learned a few PR tricks from BP and Apple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC