http://www.propublica.org/blog/item/gulf-seafood-gets-chemically-tested-for-oil-not-dispersantNOAA, the FDA and the Gulf states have been rigorously testing <1> Gulf seafood for oil—doing smell tests <2> with teams of human sniffers, and performing chemical tests for the harmful polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, or PAHs, found naturally in crude oil.
But they’re not chemically testing—at least, not yet—for the presence of oil dispersant. BP has thus far applied more than 1.7 million gallons <3> of one chemical dispersant, Corexit, to the Gulf. (The lack of dispersant testing for seafood has been mentioned by The Palm Beach Post <4> and CNN <5>, but we first noticed toward the end of this Los Angeles Times piece <6>.)
Both the FDA and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration say that dispersant in seafood isn’t the primary concern—it’s oil, because the oil is more likely to be found in the flesh of the fish. Teams of scientists--whose noses are believed to be sensitive enough to sniff out oil--are also trained to detect the smell of dispersant, but the chemical testing is limited to crude oil hydrocarbons.
“There is, however, work being done here to develop testing for dispersant. That’s ongoing,” said Monica Allen, a spokeswoman with the National Marine Fisheries Service, a division of NOAA.
-snip-
---------------------------
is this still 2010? the best we can do is a nose? and "ongoing". how long is ongoing? our scientists can't think fast?
is any of this believable?
and why the hell isn't the govt. advising pregnant women and children to leave the toxic areas?