Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Percentage of population below the extreme poverty line in Brazil, year by year. Check this out.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 10:52 PM
Original message
Percentage of population below the extreme poverty line in Brazil, year by year. Check this out.
The last 7 years are Lula. The 8 years before that are his rich-fucks-friendly predecessor. See a pattern?



Fundação Getúlio Vargas has been doing these measurements year by year for decades. Here is a nice Flash version with links to newspaper articles from relevant years. Er, um, they're in Portuguese. Sorry.

The explanation is painfully simple: the Lula administration steadily and consistently raised the minimum wage year by year. That got the economy going, created jobs, meaning even more money in the hands of people intent of spending it, and so on and on and on.

All of this without undue inflation.

Please send good vibes for Lula's party's candidate for President this October, Dilma Rousseff. Amazingly, polls have her in a dead heat with the guy form the rich-fucks-friendly group.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
flvegan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 10:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. Vibes for Rousseff.
Hey, Obama...maybe you check this out, eh?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't want to detract from the main point, which is a great one
but as a graphics person, I hate these sorts of charts which visually lie. They've distorted and exaggerated the decrease. The end point should be a little less than half the height of the start point. Instead, since the axis doesn't go down to zero, they've given the impression when you first look that it's been almost completely eradicated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 11:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. How to lie with statistics
You've hit on one of the best methods, chop off most of the bar graph so that changes look bigger than they actually are.

However, that doesn't minimize Lula's staggering achievement, cutting the poverty rate nearly in half and the decrease continuing during the international economic disaster.

South American countries that took advantage of Stupid getting the US involved in 2 unwinnable wars around the planet and turned left are reaping considerable rewards. I hope the rest follow and we do, too.

That right wing stuff just never works, not for them and not for us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 11:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. We're on a roll.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. I absolutely don't want to minimize his achievement
which is stunning.

(It's more of an OCD thing with me that I have a hard time letting charts like that go without comment.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Probably the designer didn't want empty space in the graph.
Sloppy, perhaps.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hydra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It is sloppy, unfortunately
I'm pretty OCD too on scientific stuff, and I think it would be more effective showing the percentage points shaved off(More than 50% reduction, most impressive), rather than where i look and see the bottom and whee 0 should be, it's 15.5.

Great post though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 05:57 AM
Response to Reply #3
13. How to Lie with Statistics is the name of a great book
It was written in the 50s, so the numbers can be rather comical, but it's still a great read.

http://www.amazon.com/How-Lie-Statistics-Darrell-Huff/dp/0393310728/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1279191359&sr=1-1

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 09:17 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. I know, it's on the book shelf right above the puter screen
It's one of my favorites of all time and should be required reading for anyone who is interested in deconstructing propaganda.

The other classic is Vance Packard's "The Hidden Persuaders," a little dated but still packed full of useful information on visual propaganda clues.

Symbolic logic is also good to play with when deconstructing bafflegab.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
19. Just put those two on my wish list. Thanks! -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BolivarianHero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. good point
This shit makes cringe. I ever see it in academic and government stuff.

But what you also have to consider is that those who are still below the poverty line are almost certainly better off than they were 8 years ago. They're likely below the poverty line by a lesser margin than they may have been before and they probably have access to more and better social programs that do not require wealth or income to take advantage of.

What's even more hilarious is that people who are doing in Latin American and elsewhere in the developing world what social democrats and Keynesian-minded liberals and conservatives did in the developed worlds before the 80s (where shitty electoral systems have allowed the right to subvert the will of the people in many politically and economically powerful countries, Britain, Canada, and the U.S. coming to mind, and lay waste to a lot of this. Fuck 16 Billion on war vehicles in Canada and 30 billion in Afghanistan from Uncle Sam. If there's an afterlife, I'm sure Brezhnev is laughing at all of us, Bush and Obama especially. Afghanistan and the extremism that exists there is in large part America's sword. Perhaps Uncle Sam should be retired in favour of Brutus.) are being presented as left-wing extremists.

Here in Canada, Tories nationalized hydro in the early 1900s to stop robber barons in Ontario from extorting people and allowing future governments of various political stripes to bring about rural electrification. Similar, the 1960s saw Quebec's Liberal government create Hydro-Quebec to stop Anglo-American elites from plundering Quebec's natural resources and to ensure that the province's massive hydroelectric resources and the revenue they bring in benefit society as a whole rather than a few particular interests. How is nationalising oil in Venezuela any different? I guess the Third World still has to operates on a different set of bullshit rules, a fact that Iranians learned the hard way in the 1950s. You look at the situation now, and it's obvious that we're all paying a Hell of a lot for Churchill's cheap Iranian oil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
14. it's a graph of the percentage of the population in poverty. the points are clearly labeled, with
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 06:03 AM by Hannah Bell
percents.

you'd have to work at it to misinterpret the last value as zero.

it's written in big numbers: 16.02

my only issue is why the change from decimals to commas in the percents for the last few numbers in the series.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. I take it you aren't a fan of Edward Tufte. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. And yet...
Well, it did kick the thread.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
noamnety Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #21
22. Yep - I kicked - and recommended the thread.
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 11:52 AM by noamnety
I can appreciate what the chart is saying, while critiquing the graphics from an information design point of view.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Another kick; The big numbers at each data point avoided confusion for me.
:rofl:
:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:35 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. Kids, kids, let's not fight over silly things, OK? Here, have some hot cocoa and cookies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. No fight here, just a few more kicks.
And if it came off as too snarky, my apologies.

Writing is a difficult medium and misinterpretation is all too easy.

And Gingersnaps!? I fucking hate Gingersnaps! You all hate me!
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:54 AM
Response to Original message
9. Lula has been a truly amazing leader.
It's very sad to see his term come to an end.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Judi Lynn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. Amazing, and wonderful. All this progress while raising the minimum wage steadily, too.
Don't think I've ever seen right-wingers create this kind of progress, even with their deviant, soulless, anal tactics.

It's enchanting seeing that decrease head downward EVERY year.

Hope you will get a good President this election, Commie Pinko Dirtbag. I'm afraid to see how Lula's party's choice is doing, so much depends on her winning. We'll be waiting and watching, you can be sure.

Thank you for a look at a REAL record by a man who takes his job seriously, who has acted like a true leader always. Brazil should be so proud of him.

Recommending.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. I wonder where the usual LatAm threads suspects are.
Grinding their teeth in rage, maybe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onestepforward Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 03:50 AM
Response to Original message
11. Sending vibes to Rousseff.
What an accomplishment. Very inspiring.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
12. Imagine that. Pumping money into the bottom of society makes ti better for everyone.
What a concept! But of course "nobody could've predicted this"...
:kick: & R

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #12
17. I want this to be spread far and wide. And rubbed on the idiots' faces. -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
20. Somehow he did it all without nationalizing (stealing) assets and putting disenters in prison
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 11:39 AM by Statistical
like another Latin American leader who is more beloved on DU.

Very interesting to look at the economies of Brazil and Venezuela over the same period of time.

Brazil is also a great emerging market to invest in. Lula has been able to improve the standard of living in Brazil while still keeping the company attractive to investors, thus a massive amount of capital has flooded into the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #20
23. Nationalization or not, he and his policies are still leftist.
He did wealth redistribution. (Something that can be done in many ways.)

And it worked.

Hurts, innit?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #20
28. The histories and demographics of the two countries in question are identical, right?
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #20
30. I don't think nationalizing certain industries is stealing
I think it's stopping an oligarchy from scamming citizens. I think energy, insurance, and health SHOULD be nationalized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Statistical Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Nationalization without compensation IS STEALING.
I have no problem with vital industries being nationalized however to simply seize assets and say they belong to the government now is stealing pure and simply.

If I buys assets from you and operates them = legit
If I seize assets from you and operate them = stealing

If the govt buys assets from you and operates them = legit
If the govt seize assets from you and operate them = stealing

Sorry I wasn't clear I am talking about nationalization without compensation like what was done in Venezuela and had the predictable result of crushing any economic activity and sinking the country into a recession at a time when rest of Latin American is booming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
27. kick for Lula!
Edited on Thu Jul-15-10 12:52 PM by LeftishBrit
and hoping for many more years of good presidents. Even 15.54% is too high a figure, and more work is needed to reduce it. But Lula deserves huge credit for his achievements so far.

I have Brazilian friends, whom I first met in 1987, when Brazil was *just* starting a tentative move to democracy, after many years of military dictatorships, and it was not at all clear whether it would last. The progress since then has been amazing! But more is still needed!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ignis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
29. K&R, thanks for posting this.
Lula's not perfect, but he's done some great things for Brazil. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femrap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
32. S. America
seems to be the rising place on the planet. May it continue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2Design Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
33. hopefully the olympics helps too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Commie Pinko Dirtbag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Too far ahead. So far, the only thing it's been able to help is the general mood.
The (2 years before Olympics) World Cup construction work is just now starting to kick into high gear. But with all else going on, it's hard to say if its influence is, or is going to be, measurable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
35. K&R
Ditching neo-liberalism has reduced poverty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
36. Great news when a poor country makes such progress in 18 years.
Not only has the country's economy grown tremendously but the economic benefits have been shared with the working class of the country.

I wonder if the decades of the 1990's and 2000's (even with the debacle of the last few years) will have seen the greatest reduction in world poverty in history.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mika Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
37. The commies must be stopped!
:sarcasm:

Thanks for posting this hopeful information.

:hi:







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 07:46 PM
Response to Original message
38. Yay Lula!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC