Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Beaverton police chief: Film officers at your own slight risk

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 02:06 PM
Original message
Beaverton police chief: Film officers at your own slight risk
Published: Saturday, July 10, 2010, 5:40 AM Updated: Monday, July 12, 2010, 9:53 AM
Brad Schmidt, The Oregonian


BEAVERTON -- If you pull out your cell phone or digital camera and record the voice of a Beaverton police officer, odds are you won't be arrested.

But, just know, you also could be handcuffed and taken to jail. It's up to the officer and his or her interpretation of the law.

That's the advice from Beaverton Police Chief Geoff Spalding, who this week clarified his department's stance on the recording of law enforcement after a $19,000 settlement with an Aloha man that ended a federal lawsuit against the city of Beaverton and one of its police officers.

The settlement comes almost two years after Beaverton police arrested Hao Xeng Vang and seized his cell phone because he recorded officers arresting his friend at a bowling alley. A similar incident in Portland prompted city attorneys to advise the Portland Police Bureau that officers generally do not have the right to seize cameras or arrest people for recording them in public, except in rare circumstances.

Spalding said Oregon's eavesdropping statutes, ORS 165.540 and ORS 165.543, are complex and intended to ensure privacy. Spalding said he believes his officers can arrest people who record officers' private conversations without permission. But the likelihood of arrest, Spalding said, "is pretty low."

"That is a technical violation of the law. That doesn't mean there's going to be an arrest," Spalding said.

http://www.oregonlive.com/beaverton/index.ssf/2010/07/beaverton_police_chief_film_officers_at_your_own_slight_risk.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hey, I just walked past one....
:woohoo:

Beaverton police here are hard a$$es, i have been stopped 8times in the last year, have to show my ID etc.....

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Walking by and asked to show id or driving......
Walking you do not have to, just give name and address.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. 2months ago
one stopped me and a friend, "you both look like you could use a little help"......

:hi:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Exultant Democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. hahahaha, now that is funny. Do that and you'll end up in cuffs quicker then Robert Gates
the rules do not apply to cops. If you are stopped lower your eyes and do everything they want or I assure you you will spend time in handcuffs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. No, I have done it........
You have no reason to show a cop your ID if walking. Just name and address only in Kansas, some states no need to give name. Also, you have no need to carry ID if not driving. So how can you show ID if you do not have it?

They can pat you down, outside of cloths for weapons only. Not reach into pockets unless they detect a weapon.

If they suspect you are committing a crime or was about too they can detain you.

Otherwise, the most important question you can ask is "Officer, am I free to go".

Keep that in mind.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. They can detain you until they identify you.
There is precious little to prevent them from detaining you until they identify you. So if you are merely in the vicinity of a crime that has been committed, they're on grounds to obligate you to identify yourself, or be detained.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 02:57 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Identify means name and address only in Kansas........
That is why you need to ask "Am I free to leave officer". That means Detain or not. And they KNOW what that question means.

They can only detain if they have responsible suspension you committed or were about to commit a crime.

I have had cops stop me and ask why I was walking where I was walking. After so long, I ask if I am free to leave and they let me leave.

But you are right, the wrong cop, and anymore it is > 50%, will give you shit. I am just someone who gets sick of cops abusing power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. THEY id you
without some form of ID, they can detain you until they get some independent verification of who you are.

I don't like abouse of power either. And I think the USSC has made it much easier with recent decisions. None the less, it is important to understand what they can, and cannot, do.

I don't "consent" to searches of my car during traffic stops. But I also know that by doing that, I'm setting up a situation where they can detain me for hours while they obtain a search warrant. Fortunately, the last time the cop got a call for a "real crime" and just split.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Only is they suspect you are, have or are about to commit a crime.....
And they need some proof of that suspicion.

And saying "officer, I do not consent to a search of my vehicle" if NOT automatically evidence that you have something to hide. People get this wrong all the time.

If the cop has reasonable suspicion you have something illegal in your car they will have to prove it in court. If a cop said "your honor, my reasonable cause is he did not want me to search his car" the judge would laugh him out of the court.

Here is a great site: http://www.fourthamendment.com/blog/

Great Video!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wXkI4t7nuc


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Merely being in the area
The case that went before the USSC, the person in question was standing at a truck talking to someone. A bank had been robbed near by and the cop came up and asked for some ID.

And for the car, suspicion is so easy to establish, they can do it for anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. I agree....
If there was a bank robbed by me while I am at the gas station I would cooperate.

I am talking about cops harassing me.

The RIGHT Way to Handle a Police Stop

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDJrQBwJpqk
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. But you won't know
The problem is that you won't necessarily know that there was a crime nearby. And they are unlikely to tell you right up front. So as a general principal, it's a good idea to present government issued ID. That effectively disempowers them greatly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 02:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. Are officers' on-duty conversations while interacting with the public "private?" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. How does this law work? How can I tape my kids baseball game? Other kids are on field also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zeemike Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. If you are in a public place you don't have the expectation of privacy
Or that is the way it used to be....but I guess cops feel that does not apply to them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. OK, makes sense. Thanks!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 02:32 PM
Response to Original message
6. Whatever came of "If you ain't doing anything wrong, you have nothing to be afraid of"?
A favorite RW meme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. We never heard of that one in the so-called "hood" nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bozita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. I meant to direct that to the camera-shy cops.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Downtown Hound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
15. So pigs can film me anytime, even set up cameras on streets
But I'm not allowed to do the same?

Hey chief, pursue fascism at your own risk because a lot of us out here are real fucking tired of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MrScorpio Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-10 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. "You have no expectation of privacy, if you're out in public..."
Unless you're a cop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC