The ($700+ million dollar) Littoral Combat Ship, produced by General Dynamics, underway during builder's trials.Navy Weighs Ship's Design, Along With Its Own FutureBy NATHAN HODGE
JULY 11, 2010
WASHINGTON—This summer, the Navy expects to choose between two competing designs for the Littoral Combat Ship, a fast, shore-hugging warship that will take on 21st century missions like chasing pirates and intercepting drug smugglers.
At issue is more than a shipbuilding contract. The contest underscores a broad discussion taking place inside and outside the Navy about the future size and shape of the service's fleet.
U.S. naval power is built in large part around carrier strike groups, a costly armada of nuclear-powered aircraft carriers and escort ships that project American power around the globe. Littoral Combat Ships are pint-size in comparison. They will be roughly the size of a frigate—smaller than a destroyer, larger than a patrol boat—but with more automation.
Fully loaded for combat, they will have about 75 people aboard, about a third a frigate's crew. In often outsize Pentagon terms, the craft will be relatively cheap: roughly half a billion dollars each. A new carrier is projected to cost around $10 billion.
The Navy is choosing between designs offered by Lockheed Martin Corp. and the U.S. unit of Australia's Austal Ltd., which has teamed with General Dynamics Corp. Both models have innovative features. The Lockheed variant, 378 feet long and built at Fincantieri Marine Group LLC's Marinette Marine Corp. shipyard in Marinette, Wis., has a high-speed steel hull that lets it travel at over 40 knots (about 50 miles an hour).
unhappycamper comment: The original Deepwater program had LCS ships coming in around $200 million dollars. The first one cost $500+ million dollars. This trimaran came in at $700+ million dollars.
Both of them are a tad overpriced.
P.S. The USS Gerald R. Ford, first of the Ford class carriers, is going to cost somewhere between $16.5 to $40 billion dollars.