Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Fundamental Difference Between Obama & The New Deal & Great Society Predecessors

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 07:59 PM
Original message
The Fundamental Difference Between Obama & The New Deal & Great Society Predecessors
Edited on Mon Jul-12-10 07:59 PM by kpete
The more fundamental difference between the Obama era and its New Deal and Great Society predecessors is this: Back then, progressives did not define the left end of the political spectrum. In the 1930s and 1960s, America featured honest-to-goodness alternatives to capitalism, home-grown radical movements that scared the crap out of the American establishment and sent some of its denizens scurrying into arms of reformers like FDR and LBJ. Because our entire ideological spectrum has shifted right since communism’s collapse, reforms that once looked like centrist compromises now look like the brainchild of Chairman Mao.

In the 1930s, some of America’s most prominent intellectuals saw communism as a serious alternative to Depression-era capitalism. (One reason so many writers and artists got in trouble during the McCarthyite scare of the early 1950s was that so many had flirted with pro-communist groups during FDR’s presidency). And while American communism never became a mass movement, the Depression years birthed home-spun assaults on capitalism that were almost as frightening.

more:
http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-07-12/peter-beinart-on-why-liberals-are-down-on-obama/?cid=hp:mainpromo6
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FBI_Un_Sub Donating Member (610 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 08:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. True statement of history
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burnsei sensei Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 08:26 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama, along with Herbert Hoover,
believes in two things:
volunteerism and
corporatism.

FDR used the force of law and his own sense of direction.
Obama uses the force of nothing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 08:28 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. There is absolutely nothing in your post that can be argued.
Edited on Mon Jul-12-10 08:32 PM by bobbolink
Its to cry. :cry:

We need us some Mother Jones!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. FDR did the right thing because he didn't want people to die
in the streets. Now its all about triangulation and re-election. Read Traitor to his Class. Great book.

RV, a FDR democrat to the bone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MisterP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
4. most of the New Dealers were purged: by 1948 Truman had so heated up the Cold War that
Henry Wallace warmed up the Progressive Party, but Strum Thurmond's run chased many back to Truman, who lifted the Progs' platform

in the 50s, the "center" was defined as what was American, and "extremists" were thus anti-American, tarring Reds and Klansmen as brothers under the skin

things moved further right with the late 70s: the rise of the neocons, Raygun's Cold Warriors, the Volcker Memo, rightist think-tanks and propaganda mills (now we have JunkScience and the El Mozote deniers at Accuracy in Media, joined by scores of media heads from Penn and Teller to Michelle Malkin

the DLC was the cherry on the dog-poo sundae, moving the Dems to the right after Gingrich moved the GOP, all the while citing Dems' (shrinking) accomplishments

in 2000, if someone told the average center-conservative that we'd be entusiastically torturing and assassinating, they'd have screamed that they hated America; when such atrocities were conducted, they then cheered them on

in 2008, if someone told the average non-lefty non-Palinoid that they were enthusiastically supporting an opponent of healthcare, clean power, peace, and Social Security, they'd have screamed that they were a Rovian stooge; when such policies were enacted, they cheered them on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 06:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC