First, the whole story is phony. Completely bogus. Manufactured out of thinly-veiled racism and even thinner air. It doesn't even make rational sense - why would the Obama team, renowned for their political savvy, stick out their necks for an extremist hate group?
Second, you won't just see it on Fox News. You'll also see it on CNN. You'll see White House press secretary Robert Gibbs asked about it. Already conservatives are complaining that the media are ignoring the story. Before long you'll see other major media outlets reporting on the "controversy" and how the administration is facing accusations of "reverse racism."
The New Black Panther story is in the middle stages of the Fox Cycle -- the process by which the false, ridiculous ramblings of right-wing bloggers and partisan media hacks can, with a generous assist from Fox News, make it to the front pages of the New York Times.
Put simply, the Fox Cycle begins with the blogosphere. Conservative bloggers seize on a story and start twisting it and injecting falsehoods. Before long, Fox News catches on and, usually with Glenn Beck or Sean Hannity playing the lead role, devotes obscene amounts of coverage to the bogus story. The bloggers take Fox News' heavy coverage as validation of the story's veracity, and before long they join with the conservative network in carping that the rest of the media are ignoring it. Soon after, the rest of the media relent and start covering the story, at which point it becomes a mini-frenzy. Then the pundits chime in, crediting Fox News for giving the story legs and being ahead of the rest of media. Finally, long after the damage has been done and the media have largely moved on, the facts emerge and the story is confirmed to be junk.
It's a cycle that's been repeated over and over in the past, with varying degrees of success. The ACORN videos, Obama's "relationship" with William Ayers, and the "Climategate" non-scandal managed to make it all the way through the cycle, inflicting irreparable and unjustified damage to the community organizing movement and the reputations of respected climate scientists, not to mention the President of the United States, who was at one point accused of "palling around with terrorists."
http://mediamatters.org/blog/201007120007Philadelphia Inquirer: No Sign Of Wrongful Dismissal in Black Panther CaseWhile Fox News seems to think the recent claims that an alleged voter intimidation case involving Black Panther Party members in Philadelphia was wrongly dismissed, the top local newspaper there seems to disagree.
The Philadelphia Inquirer on Friday ran an editorial that stated the dismissal of the case stemming from alleged actions on Election Day 2008 appears to be valid.
"Some critics say Obama and his black attorney general, Eric Holder, were lenient because they are biased," the editorial stated. "These critics equate the New Black Panther Party to the Ku Klux Klan in its heyday. In fact, the group is more accurately described by Abigail Thernstrom, longtime Republican member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, as a 'lunatic fringe.'
"That's not to say small hate groups aren't dangerous. But the scale of justice must be applied appropriately, and here it appears that it was. Attempts to inflate the incident to bash Obama must be seen for what they are."
Inquirer Editor Bill Marimow, meanwhile, said his paper has covered the recent claims by former Justice Department Attorney J. Christian Adams and his testimony before the U.S. Civil Rights Commission. But he sees no reason to investigate them further.
http://mediamatters.org/strupp/201007120023Bush DOJ decided New Black Panthers no major case5:12 pm July 12, 2010, by ctucker
Several of you have clamored for me to say something about the alleged voter intimidation case in Philadelphia, which involves a thuggish group who call themselves the “New Black Panthers.” (While I was no fan of the original Black Panthers, they don’t deserve to have their reputation further befouled by this group. The two groups are in no way related.)
I was loathe to comment since I know that no rational discussion will follow. How could it? It was clear from the beginning that this was not a case of voter intimidation against anyone who might vote for John McCain. As many observers noted on that day, no matter how badly those two New Black Panters were behaving (and the police were called and responded), it’s a HEAVILY DEMOCRATIC PRECINCT. As blogger Ben Smith noted way back then, “You don’t typically intimidate your own voters.”
But solid reporting from Media Matters and Adam Serwer of The American Prospect ought to put this nonsense to rest (it won’t, but it should). The charges against the New Black Panthers were downgraded by the Bush Department of Justice:
The decision not to file a criminal case occurred before Obama was even in office.
This means that the case was downgraded to a civil case 11 days before Obama was inaugurated, 26 days before Eric Holder became attorney general, and about nine months before Thomas Perez was confirmed as head of the Civil Rights Division.
http://blogs.ajc.com/cynthia-tucker/2010/07/12/bush-doj-decided-new-black-panthers-no-major-case/?cxntfid=blogs_cynthia_tucker