Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Boeing Touts KC-X Cost, Jobs (interesting discussion at end of thread)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-12-10 06:14 AM
Original message
Boeing Touts KC-X Cost, Jobs (interesting discussion at end of thread)



Boeing Touts KC-X Cost, Jobs
By Colin Clark Friday, July 9th, 2010 11:35 am
Posted in Air, International

Boeing’s tanker bid is in for the $40 billion program. The company focused on size and cost in its release announcing the bid.

The 8,000-page proposal, “hand-delivered” to Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, “offers an American-made, 767-based multi-mission tanker that will satisfy all 372 mandatory Air Force requirements and be capable, survivable, and combat-ready at the lowest cost to the taxpayer,” according to the company’s press release.

Aiming squarely at claims by EADS NA that its plane can offload more fuel at faster rates and has a tanker flying and ready to get built, Boeing said its tanker “will deliver widebody capabilities in a narrowbody footprint, operate in any theater or from any base, and — with the lowest operating cost of any tanker in the competition — save the Air Force and the American taxpayers billions of dollars.”

One of the attributes mentioned in the Boeing release — the digital flight deck using 787 Dreamliner displays — raises interesting questions about cost that Boeing has so far not addressed. This is the biggest change from the last bid. Several close observers of the tanker competition say placing such modern technology in a relatively old airframe will require substantial and probably costly modifications.

Among the reasons for the Boeing decision to install the 787 technology is that this is proof of commitment to the company’s “design philosophy that places the pilot in command rather than allowing computer software to limit combat maneuverability.” That’s a nice dig at Airbus’ fly-by-wire approach which places considerable reliance on intelligent software and built-in systems to manage airplane performance.



unhappycamper comment: Byron Skinner is a very knowledgeable person about most things military.

His comment in this thread caught my eye:
Then we have the Russian bid which presents some very interesting economics. The US is already in agreement to lease to buy six An-124’s, and is in contract negotiations for an additional order of An-124’s that could be somewhere between 100–150 aircraft. The US is currently under contract with the Russians to purchase at least 75 MI-17 helicopters for Pakistan, Afghanistan and Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC