Tension is mounting between BP and the neighborhood retailers that sell its gasoline. As more Americans shun BP gasoline as a form of protest over the Gulf oil spill, station owners are insisting BP do more to help them convince motorists that such boycotts mostly hurt independently owned businesses, not the British oil giant. To win back customers, they'd like the company's help in reducing the price at the pump.
BP owns just a fraction of the more than 11,000 stations across the U.S. that sell its fuel under the BP, AMOCO and ARCO banners. Most are owned by local businessmen whose primary connection to the oil company is the logo and A CONTRACT TO BUY GASOLINE.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100627/ap_on_bi_ge/us_oil_spill_bp_at_the_pump1. BP stations have contracts to buy gas from BP. Station owners make very little profit on it; they make the majority of their profits from overpriced sundries. BP doesn't make gas contracts without making money from them.
2. BP also has various other ways of making money out of branded stations, such as licensing or franchise fees, cuts on sundries, & the in-store sales of products they also get a cut on, such as Castrol, Aral, & BP oils/lubricants.
AM/PM is also a BP franchise business, as is wild bean cafe.
3. When you boycott stations, station owners bring various kinds of pressure on BP, up to & including lawsuits.
4. The argument that BP stations are run by innocent little independent businesspeople is mostly a crock. Name-brand stations require large initial investments, & most "investors" in the business own multiple stations or represent investment firms, as you can verify by running the names of some of the station operators quoted in recent news reports through google.
Furthermore, the fact that "little people" will be hurt never stops corporations from doing whatever the hell they please.
But when actions of "little people" have the potential to cause some harm to corporations, they'll start crying in their beer about all the little mom & pop stations, investors, employees, etc. that will be hurt.
5. The suggestion that instead of boycotting BP, people "push for investments in alternative energy" is another crock -- will you write a strongly worded letter to your Congressperson? Well, good luck with that, you'll wait until doomsday. You have no leverage without a big group that can get media attention or big money behind you.
The suggestion that you "make sure the big guys pay" is about as useful. How are *you* as an individual going to do that? You've noticed how often the "big guys" have paid within the last 10 years -- never, I think.
These locusts understand money, and that's about all they understand.
The current political situation is one in which there are a lot of pissed-off people, many losing their livelihoods, property, quality of life, etc. because of reckless corporate behavior.
It's a perfect situation for a boycott because the number of people seriously affected by the spill is so large; thus, hundreds of thousands of people have direct reason to boycott, & will, even without a central organization.
Boycott.
You want to make your boycott include less driving, less use of oil products - fine. But boycott.
If you want to write strongly worded letters to your Congresspeople about alternative energy development & prosecuting those responsible for the spill, that's great too. But boycott.