|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 12:17 AM Original message |
I currently oppose Kagan's confirmation, How about you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 12:18 AM Response to Original message |
1. How can you support Robin Carnahan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 12:21 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. A SCOTUS nominee doesn't have to get elected. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sandnsea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 12:50 AM Response to Reply #2 |
15. Not logical |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 02:27 AM Response to Reply #15 |
21. How do you figure that? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PBS Poll-435 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 12:21 AM Response to Original message |
3. At least there is a pathway... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nite Owl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 12:22 AM Response to Original message |
4. Leaning against but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 12:25 AM Response to Reply #4 |
6. That would have offended someone, can't blame her for that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 12:24 AM Response to Original message |
5. I support it, but less so than I did before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 12:26 AM Response to Reply #5 |
8. I could think of about 15 alternatives off the top of my head. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 12:28 AM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Alternative appointments, maybe (though that list would get a lot narrower.) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 12:32 AM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Maybe get us Garland? I don't know, the Right went from Meyers to Alito or was it Roberts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 12:41 AM Response to Reply #12 |
13. But why would Garland be any better than Kagan? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 12:45 AM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I don't think Collins and others would block a SCOTUS nominee, hasn't been done before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 12:51 AM Response to Reply #14 |
16. SCOTUS nominees have been blocked before. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 12:56 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. he wasn't filibustered, we could send up Karlan and get 50 almost without a doubt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 01:02 AM Response to Reply #18 |
19. But Karlan would certainly be filibustered. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 02:26 AM Response to Reply #19 |
20. Who are the 9 we would lose? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unvanguard (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 02:37 AM Response to Reply #20 |
22. We'd have to gain one, and avoid losing any. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluestateguy (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 12:26 AM Response to Original message |
7. Undecided |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
usregimechange (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 12:27 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Well, that is as good a compass as any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SidDithers (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 12:29 AM Response to Original message |
11. Why can't we see what you think now?...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amandabeech (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 12:51 AM Response to Original message |
17. I think that the President could have done much better. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BzaDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 02:45 AM Response to Original message |
23. Most of what I have seen so far has made me generally supportive of the nomination. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gleaner (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Jun-27-10 06:53 AM Response to Original message |
24. I oppose her confirmation. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 09:36 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC