Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sacramento Fox affiliate won’t apologize for broadcasting "off-the-cuff assessment" of Palin speech

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 10:25 AM
Original message
Sacramento Fox affiliate won’t apologize for broadcasting "off-the-cuff assessment" of Palin speech


A Fox affiliate television station is refusing to apologize for accidentally broadcasting a room full of reporters offering very frank assessments of a speech by former half-term Alaska Governor Sarah Palin.

The slip-up happened Friday night as Fox40 in Sacramento was broadcasting live from California State University, Stanislaus. After the speech concluded, journalists and crew members behind the scenes offered some off-the-cuff assessment of her remarks, with one man saying he felt like he'd just stepped off a roller coaster.

Another said he could understand why "the dumbness doesn't come through in sound-bytes." Yet another argued that she'd not used a complete sentence or even "made a statement."

The station insists their reporter and photographer were not behind the comments -- however, they do not offer an apology or name the reporters whose voices were picked up.

Indeed, it's possible the error was due to Palin's pronounced dislike of the media, as even the Fox crew was turned away from her actual speech, according to their explanation. Instead of filming the former official up close, they were forced to point their cameras at a screen in a media overflow area at some separate venue.

http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0626/fox-affiliate-apologize-mistakenly-broadcasting-reporters-calling-palin-dumb/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Stick a fork in her
I b'lieve she's done.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pretzel4gore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. president 45...
question: Why is there so many 'brownshirts' running around the Olde Sod (planet earth)?
answer: Bush and Palin and reagan before them wipes their butts with USA etc...
iow, we're toilet paper to the governing class!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HipChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 10:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why should they apologize for her being stupid? but this is the bigger issue
Palin claimed Democrats support female mutilation..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Frank Zappa nailed the Palin apology concept in his song "San Ber'dino"......
..."Oh Bobby, I'm sorry you gotta head like a potato...I really am ..."

:rofl:

So the apology SHOULD be offered, and it should go something like this:

"Oh half-term Governor Sarah Palin, I'm sorry you can't speak in complete sentences of form simple thoughts in a way that you can communicate them effectively...I really am ..."

:rofl:

You're right, we have reached a sad state of affairs when we even discuss apologizing to a public figure, a politician, who is several slices shy of a loaf, for BEING several slices shy of a loaf. Maybe she should trot out Trig the next time so the media can apologize to him too, even if they never mention him. They can apologize to Trig simply because Palin delivered another lame-ass speech and the media called her on it and she can manipulate events to represent a hate crime against her Down Syndrome baby, as he's done many times in the past, and as always, no one will question her. No one.

She seems to be uneducated (in the same "intellectually incurious" manner of George W. Bush), she's inarticulate (relying heavily on worn catch-phrases in order to pump up the crowd whenever she's short on actual substance), AND...the BEST part...she never hesitates for a MOMENT to toss a brick through the glass house of anyone she doesn't like.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beaverhausen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Yours is the second post I've seen that mentions that. Do you have a link?
not that I don't believe you, but a link would be useful. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. No link, but I did find this:
Posted at FR:

"Her mentioning of female genital mutilation and General Napier were deadly accurate and hit the nail on the head. Her take down of cultural relativism was a knock at the Lefties who populate the Academy."

Still searching for the actual quote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crim son Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. I'm sure the dumbness would come through
loud and clear to people who aren't as dumb or dumber than she is i.e. nobody voluntarily attending the speech.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lpbk2713 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
5. She's dumber than a box of moose turds.



There's just no escaping the obvious.





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hope they're ready for a Twitter-lashing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
7. well hey- isn't she all about the right to "free speech"??
don't the people who said what they did have a right to their opinions?

Or only her-Majesty Ms.Palin?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GrantDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
8. How's that free pressy, free speechy thing workin' out fer ya?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
10. recommend
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC