Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GOP's Emmer: 'The State Certainly Does Have The Right' To Overturn Federal Laws

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 11:29 PM
Original message
GOP's Emmer: 'The State Certainly Does Have The Right' To Overturn Federal Laws


Minnesota state Rep. Tom Emmer, the presumptive Republican nominee for governor, has further expounded on his theories of nullification, declaring that states have the power under the Constitution to undo federal legislation.

There's one problem that Emmer and other nullifiers -- or to use a modern term from the blogosphere, "Tenthers," after the Tenth Amendment -- would face: State nullification of federal laws has consistently been found to be unconstitutional throughout this country's history.

MinnPost asked Emmer about his support for a http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/06/emmer-defends-nullification-minnesotans-should-have-a-say-in-the-laws-that-govern-them.php">proposed state constitutional amendment that would presumptively nullify all federal laws in the state of Minnesota, declaring that they only take effect if the governor and two-thirds of each House of the Minnesota legislature were to sign off.

Interestingly, Emmer minimized his role in that proposal, saying that he was only a co-sponsor. Instead he pointed to a different proposal, of which he is the chief author, which would provide an alternative avenue for the state to reject federal laws.

Under Emmer's proposal, no federal mandate upon the state would be honored by Minnesota unless the governor, Speaker of the state House and state Senate Majority Leader were to issue determinations that the federal government has the power to legislate in that area. If any of those three officials were to determine that the federal government does not have the relevant power, the mandate could not take effect unless the legislature passed a law specifically applying it.

MinnPost pointed out to Emmer that this idea runs afoul of the Supremacy Clause of the Constitution, which established that federal laws are the "supreme Law of the Land" to which states are bound. It was only noted that Emmer's method skips the traditionally accepted manner for states to challenge a federal law, to file a lawsuit and adjudicate the matter in the courts. Emmer responded that this is the "preferred mechanism by some. That is usually federal-leaning constitutionalists." But he said the states shouldn't wait for courts to determine the scope of the federal government's authority.

More: http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/06/gops-emmer-the-state-certainly-does-have-the-right-to-overturn-federal-laws-no-they-dont.php?ref=fpb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KonaKane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Somebody is basically ignorant about how our system works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Historic NY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. Really.....that was decided back in the 1860's too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laconicsax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Try 1830s.
There was that whole "Nullification Crisis" thing that sorted this problem about 180 years ago.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hardrada Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 12:42 AM
Response to Reply #7
10. Andrew Jackson had to set John C. Calhoun straight on this
with a scarcely-veiled threat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 01:31 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. It wasn't "veiled" at ALL: Jackson threatened to hang him as a traitor. Period. n/t.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pirate Smile Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 11:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. President Obama truly has driven Republicans insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HillWilliam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
14. They were already nuckinfutz
Having a scary black man in the White House was just the last straw to push them out in the open with their batshittery. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Let him try
Watch him get slapped down hard. With a little luck, he might try to tell a Federal Judge off-I would pay money to see that.

The last time someone tried to tell Uncle Sam they didn't have to follow Federal law didn't work out so well back in 1865.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. The Lunatics Are Out On The Lawn, Sir
People like this simply cannot be a majority....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Unfortunately, they don't have to be
When enough lunatics band together and convince each other--and the majority--that the laws either don't apply to them or are too troublesome to enforce, they gain power by simply refusing to obey them.

It's easy to "win" if you throw the rulebook out and everyone else is still playing by it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 11:50 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Remins me of the famous Goethe quote
“There is nothing more terrible than ignorance in action.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-25-10 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Emmer has some reading to do
or he's going to be in for a series of truly ugly surprises should the people of Minnesota take complete leave of their senses and elect him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
11. He dreams of being king of Somalia. He just doesn't know it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 02:00 AM
Response to Original message
13. oh, like marijuana laws? great! lol, I bet he is all for federal law for that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KamaAina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
15. Is there a Ft. Sumter up there?
This guy could end up making us miss Pawlenty! :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-26-10 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
16. Wow, this nut-fuck is even crazier than I thought!
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC