Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Have you heard about this: Petraeus for President (2012)?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
1776Forever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 12:56 PM
Original message
Have you heard about this: Petraeus for President (2012)?
Edited on Wed Jun-23-10 12:59 PM by 1776Forever
Petraeus for President? Army General Keeps Speculation Alive
Aides Deny that Petraeus is Eyeing a Bid, but Analysts say He's Playing Coy

By HOWARD LaFRANCHI
May 16, 2010

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/david-petraeus-speculation-presidential-bid-alive/story?id=10645536

Speculation has run rampant for months that Gen. David Petraeus, who heads the US Army's Central Command and is widely credited with lead authorship of the "people first" counterinsurgency doctrine implemented in Iraq and Afghanistan, is toying with the idea of a run for the White House.

General Petraeus did little to squelch that speculation last week when he spoke at the annual dinner of the American Enterprise Institute (AEI), one of Washington's premier conservative think tanks.

With former Vice President Dick Cheney and members of the Bush-era glitterati known as the neo-cons looking on, Petraeus accepted AEI's annual Irving Kristol Award, named after the giant of neo-conservatism -- a conservative ideology with roots in American liberal thinking that eschews realist foreign policy in favor of an activist and interventionist approach to the world. The highest goal of neo-conservatism is the spread of "American values" including freedom and democracy.

......

Makes you go hmmmmmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
dhill926 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. keep your enemies close?.............n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Let's hope that's the motive. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. AND he's now made Afghanistan Petraeus' war, too. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Morbius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Generals can win elections, but only if they come from popular wars.
The last general to successfully translate his military career into a Presidency was Adlai Stevenson, who left office nearly 50 years ago. The last before that was a civil war general, Grant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. I'm thinking President Eisenhower...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BonnieJW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 01:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. You mean Eisenhower, right?
Adlai Stevenson wasn't president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murielm99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. He wasn't a general, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. delete - misread response. eom
Edited on Wed Jun-23-10 02:08 PM by laughingliberal
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Morbius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 04:04 AM
Response to Reply #5
16. Yeah.... I was tired. Sorry. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. Adlai Stevenson was a Democratic Governor of Illinois. He ran against Eisenhower and
lost. Eisenhower was a general who led troops in WWII. He beat Stevenson because he promised to end the Korean War. He did get the fighting to stop when he took office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. Um....Dwight Eisenhower was the hero of WWII who became the 33rd President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-24-10 05:30 AM
Response to Reply #2
17. Following Grant, Presidents Hayes and Garfield had also been generals
And while not a general, Teddy Roosevelt's time as colonel of the Rough Riders did nothing to damage his own political career.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sinistrous Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 03:22 PM
Response to Original message
11. The neo-cons have been grooming Petraeus for years.
He will be running for President, in 2016, if not 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 03:28 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. And it'll take some serious grooming for betrayus to be anything close to presidential
his aspiration for the white house is not a worry of mine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Golden Raisin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. In a land where Bush the Younger
was President for 8 horrifying years and Sarah Palin was nominated and taken seriously as a Vice Presidential candidate (the proverbial heartbeat or bullet away) we all better worry because anything can and does happen here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Not honestly it won't
and if you are wanting to include dishonesty then anything goes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
brooklynite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
15. Makes me go "naaa"
National defense is only one of the three Republican pillars. He supports eliminating DADT, so there go the Social Conservatives, and there's no proof he'd increase defense spending (which includes things like Government-provided health care and ) while cutting taxes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC