Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Brit Hume: "No one over the age of four would speak on the record to Rolling Stone"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Amerigo Vespucci Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 01:29 AM
Original message
Brit Hume: "No one over the age of four would speak on the record to Rolling Stone"
Did McChrystal tell Rolling Stone Obama's advisers are "clowns" because he wanted out of Afghanistan?
By John Amato Tuesday Jun 22, 2010 6:09pm

http://crooksandliars.com/john-amato/did-mcchrystal-grant-rolling-stone-acce

Brit Hume called Gen. McChrystal really dumb because he allowed "Rolling Stone" of all media outlets access to him and his staff for a lengthy interview about how he feels about the war and his Commander in Chief. How dare he use a hippie rag instead of coming to a Villager?

Hume: This is a regular mess. The comments made by General McChrystal himself and by his aides. The astonishing lack of judgement shown in granting access to Rolling Stone. ROLLING STONE! Of all publications. No one over the age of four would speak on the record to Rolling Stone about delicate military matter and 'above all' about laying yourself with all kinds of back room opinions about your partners in the effort and the commander in chief and the vice president. This is a firing offense under normal circumstances. The president would be totally justified in General McChrystal. He may have to do it anyway....

Much of it had to be listening to Biden because he goes on and on and on, but that aside I mean he's still the Vice President of the United States, he's owed respect by General McChrystal and his subordinates aides and then in itself is what they said about him is insubordination, no question about it, I mean, I, Megan, I just don't know as I think about it whether the President can keep him even if he thinks he's vital to the mission. I mean this is pretty blatant stuff...

Kelly: Why? What is the fall out to President Obama if he keeps him?

Hume: Well, what I figure is he'll look weak. He may feel that he'll look weak, but think...(stutter) in a sense look, he may feel that he may make McChrystal crawl across enough broken glass here in Washington tomorrow and humble himself to such an extent..and he may be able to impose him some career....he might find some compromise way to keep him in the post with it being pretty clear that the guy is damaged goods. That might leave the President's prestige intact, but this is pretty strong medicine to be dealt in that article.

Kelly: Couldn't this be an opportunity for President Obama, for lack of a better word, "take the high road?" He's been criticized for having a thin skin and usually that comes with respect from the media, but is this an opportunity for him to say, it was out of line....but he's still the best man to complete a very important strategy that I've committed 30,00 additional American lives ...

Hume:...but these comments were so strong and so negative and so disrespectful and look, the fact that most of them were not made by McChrystal himself doesn't really help because he was clearly present when all these discussions were going on. All this loose talk was going on..I wonder and we may find out Rolling Stone has insisted that it's on the record and everybody knew it and I have my doubts about that. I would be surprised if Gem McChrystal said it was all on the record and we all knew it. Can you imagine anybody, look it. If that's the case the guy maybe outta be fired for being dumb! To have that kind of loose talk to any media outlet.

No one in their right mind, on the record or off talks like this to in front of the media. You just don't do it.


I think he isn't that dumb and just wanted out of Afghanistan altogether since his planning has failed completely. He can now be hailed a right wingnut hero by the fringers for calling out the President, Joe Biden and the Afghan team when he goes on a speaking tour of the AEI's and other tea party events. He can make as many false claims as he wants about what actually happened during the planning and implementation of his counter-insurgency strategy in Afghanistan since we know he'll lie even about his own troops. (Pat Tillman cover-up) So where's the downside for him to get fired? His military friends in the media, while believing his actions are a firing offense, they will say like Col. Jack Jacobs did on MSNBC that all the troops feel Obama's people are incompetent fools too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. I happe McCrystal is history, BUT I can also look at this the
same way I do the Death Penalty. Life in prison is more of a penalty than the DP, and dressing him down and then forcing him to ge his butt back to Afghan. and do his damn job would be more difficult for McC than getting fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 04:50 AM
Response to Original message
2. Boneheads' first inclination is to take a shot at the "leftist" magazine.
Fixed News hit the motherlode of material.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
3. News flash: Hume is an ignorant fool.
He has no idea what Rolling Stone is or what it stands for. But that doesn't stop him from having a strong opinion on it that he is absolutely certain about. Such a typical conservative!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sendero Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 06:41 AM
Response to Original message
4. No one with the intelligence of a 4 year old...
Edited on Wed Jun-23-10 06:41 AM by sendero
...would listen to a word broadcast by Fox News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robert DAH Bruce Donating Member (245 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 06:45 AM
Response to Original message
5. On the cover of the Rolling Stone!
And, if I have to---I mean, if it's really germaine to the article---I am willing to wear clothes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 06:48 AM
Response to Original message
6. Note Megan Kelly throwing out heinous BS
"Couldn't this be an opportunity for President Obama, for lack of a better word, "take the high road?" He's been criticized for having a thin skin and usually that comes with respect from the media..."

Funny, I don't recall the talky talks and the typey types ever referring to the president as "thin-skinned". But then again, I don't watch Fox or read wingnut effluvia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. I was just going to remark on that.
Who's criticized him for that, Megyn? The same people who were just criticizing him for not showing enough emotion over the disaster in the Gulf?

I would really like to see some election results in 2010 and 2012 that for a few moments wipe that sneer off her face and turn it into a look of blithering incredulity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laelth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
8. Rolling Stone does excellent investigative journalism.
It's one of the few magazines that does. Hume is simply wrong.

:dem:

-Laelth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Bacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
9. Nobody over the mental age of 4 would listen to Brit Hume.
Sadly, millions of sheeple have never gotten past the mental age of 4.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 08:00 AM
Response to Original message
10. And no one with half a brain & a quarter of the brain power of a slug would speak to FoxSnooze
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chrisa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 08:11 AM
Response to Original message
11. He badly needs a personality.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 08:17 AM
Response to Original message
12. And people thought I was out to lunch yesterday..
When I pointed out that Rolling Stoned is a "hippie magazine" that would be trashed by "The Serious People" (tm).

Brit Hume is a "Serious Person" (tm) and is trashing Rolling Stoned, what a fucking shock that is.

Not!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnionPatch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
13. You find more truth reading one issue the Rolling Stone
than you will find in a year of watching Fox News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 08:39 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. + 1 Quadrillion
"One word of truth outweighs the entire world." -- Alexander Solzhenitsyn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 08:38 AM
Response to Original message
14. hey brit baby, rolling stone has more journalistic credibility than your network
ever had....ever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC