Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Should President Obama Fire General McChrystal?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Parche Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 08:36 PM
Original message
Poll question: Should President Obama Fire General McChrystal?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes.
McChrystal, I'm guessing, knows that he does not serve the nation by belittling its elected officials. He should offer to resign. Some of the news sites say this has occurred.

Another man or woman should be given his role.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. Gorn. I'm warming to the idea of demoting him to some paper pusher somewhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 08:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
3.  -- which demonstrates that you are open-minded, and fair, gateley.
You heard the "Joe Bite-Me" insult and you, an ardent supporter of Vice President Biden, still allow for a more merciful fate for McChrystal.

You rock.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Awww... thank you so much, but you give me far too much credit. In all honesty
I have to confess that I think it would drive McChrystal crazy and maybe silence some of Obama's critics from both sides.

Sigh. If only I were that good a person.

Thank you anyway. :hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. - - -
Well, you might be right on both counts. Definitely it would drive McChrystal nuts.

Good to see a pro-Biden Democrat knockin' around these boards tonight.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. It will sure be interesting to see what transpires tomorrow. I'm exhausted
by all the goings-on lately, and I'll I've been doing is observing! Can you imagine how spent the real players are?

I love DU and always look for an opportunity to say Joe Is Right! :pals: :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Which is noble work. Biden has been worth following for decades.
(True about the real players in this recent dust-up. They're going to need a stiff drink before it's all over.)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Nah, that's letting him off too easily.
I say they put Private McChrystal on the front lines, if he loves this occupation so much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:51 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. Demoting him would have some benefits.
Obama could demote him to somewhere around Colonel, issue a stop-loss order for him so he can't resign or retire, then send him somewhere into the bowels of the Pentagon where he'll never be seen again as long as Obama is president.

That means no FAKES News military advisor job. No TV appearances for McChrystal at all. That'll make it much harder to make a martyr out of him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. Court martial, demote,
humiliate. Remove any opportunity for this prick to come back and bite.

That or have Joe Biden say "Bite Me? Really?? Well here I am"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. I don't necessarily agree with court-martial, but relieve him of command and let him retire.
End of story, no martyrdom, no payback or revenge, no drama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Then he can run for President
Court martial and demote - he can't do that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:42 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. What indication has there ever been that this man plans to run for President?
And why would it matter if he did? Political considerations should be taking a backseat, regardless. I don't care what McChrystal says or does afterwards, in something as serious as wartime command, the right thing to do is the right thing to do, pure of other motives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #17
20. If he's got ulterior motives
then the CiC damn well better be paying attention to them. It would be nice if all people put war and country ahead of their personal agendas, but it's clear from people like McChrystal that they don't. The RS article makes it even clearer that not even the highest ranks of the military do. With all the blather-mouthing that his guy has done and his over-sized ego, it's not that big of a leap to believe he's setting up a scenario where he can step into the Presidency. I think the RS article said as much, but perhaps it was another article I read today, I don't remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bigwillq Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. Yes
and then end the wars. NOW!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
10. Ugh, where's fuck yeah?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:07 PM
Response to Original message
11. No, but not fuck no. More of a lean.
I'm thinking a bit too much about how the German military leadership at the end of World War I basically saved themselves by transferring power to the civilians and blaming them for the defeat, thus undermining the Weimar Republic the moment it was established...

I don't think the case is a perfect parallel, but I think McChrystal ought to be kept in charge of his own policy, to keep Obama from being blamed for ruining it, and to establish proper incentives for doing one's best to save it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Toucano Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
12. If he doesn't, he's done. He should have demoted him last fall
when McChrystal was actively campaigning for the troop surge in Afghanistan.

He undermined the president then, and he'll keep on doing it as long as he's allowed to speak to the press.

Bust his ass down the ladder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dyingnumbers Donating Member (44 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. McChrystal is on very thin ice...
His fate hinges on how far the reputation of the military has been damaged by his libelous statements against the Commander-in-Chief.

Approval ratings should show a direct correlation between the extent to which this damage has been done and the populist dissatisfaction with the war to date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
19. Seriously, the guy is an idiot. And Obama is making a huge mistake if he doesn't.
Running a campaign involves multiple elements, and messaging is one of them. To speak whatever comes into your tiny little head and to allow your staff and subordinates to do the same thing, in the presence of reporters, is just fucking stupid. NO one that stupid should be in charge of anything as important as a military campaign.

Get rid of the dumbass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NoPasaran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
21. Release the Kraken!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mikeSchmuckabee Donating Member (288 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
22. And ship him to gitmo
on the other side of the fence and flush his bible down the toilet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
23. In fact a court martial should be in his future
Conduct unbecoming

Insults to a higher officer.

Not good for good order and discipline

Just some of the charges. I am sure a creative Military Lawyer can come up with the rest. 'Nough of this shit, on senior officers doing this crap. We all know junior officers and enlisted would be facing a court martial or career end if they went where Stanley went.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 10:30 PM
Response to Original message
24. A middle ground will be taken, he apologizes and stays. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fuzz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
25. Hell Yes and announce an immediate withdrawal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 02:34 AM
Response to Original message
26. That's up to Obama and McChrystal.
I can't judge what Obama should do. He and McChrystal will decide.

Maybe McChrystal will apologize big time. That might be the best solution. Maybe McChrystal can't take the defeat that he is facing in Afghanistan. In that case, he will quit and Obama won't have to fire him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 01:09 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC