Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Must read - The Myth of Multi-tasking

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 08:50 PM
Original message
Must read - The Myth of Multi-tasking
http://www.thenewatlantis.com/publications/the-myth-of-multitasking
<snip>
But more recently, challenges to the ethos of multitasking have begun to emerge. Numerous studies have shown the sometimes-fatal danger of using cell phones and other electronic devices while driving, for example, and several states have now made that particular form of multitasking illegal. In the business world, where concerns about time-management are perennial, warnings about workplace distractions spawned by a multitasking culture are on the rise. In 2005, the BBC reported on a research study, funded by Hewlett-Packard and conducted by the Institute of Psychiatry at the University of London, that found, “Workers distracted by e-mail and phone calls suffer a fall in IQ more than twice that found in marijuana smokers.” The psychologist who led the study called this new “infomania” a serious threat to workplace productivity. One of the Harvard Business Review’s “Breakthrough Ideas” for 2007 was Linda Stone’s notion of “continuous partial attention,” which might be understood as a subspecies of multitasking: using mobile computing power and the Internet, we are “constantly scanning for opportunities and staying on top of contacts, events, and activities in an effort to miss nothing.”

Dr. Edward Hallowell, a Massachusetts-based psychiatrist who specializes in the treatment of attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder and has written a book with the self-explanatory title CrazyBusy, has been offering therapies to combat extreme multitasking for years; in his book he calls multitasking a “mythical activity in which people believe they can perform two or more tasks simultaneously.” In a 2005 article, he described a new condition, “Attention Deficit Trait,” which he claims is rampant in the business world. ADT is “purely a response to the hyperkinetic environment in which we live,” writes Hallowell, and its hallmark symptoms mimic those of ADD. “Never in history has the human brain been asked to track so many data points,” Hallowell argues, and this challenge “can be controlled only by creatively engineering one’s environment and one’s emotional and physical health.” Limiting multitasking is essential. Best-selling business advice author Timothy Ferriss also extols the virtues of “single-tasking” in his book, The 4-Hour Workweek.

Multitasking might also be taking a toll on the economy. One study by researchers at the University of California at Irvine monitored interruptions among office workers; they found that workers took an average of twenty-five minutes to recover from interruptions such as phone calls or answering e-mail and return to their original task. Discussing multitasking with the New York Times in 2007, Jonathan B. Spira, an analyst at the business research firm Basex, estimated that extreme multitasking—information overload—costs the U.S. economy $650 billion a year in lost productivity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. I could have told people this YEARS ago
I saw it with drivers. It got so bad that if you knew who was on the phone you pretty much knew who caused the wreck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 08:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It's that simple
I don't know how the cell phone users and text message loonies believe they can drive and do either. I'd let them be if they could guarantee that they'd only kill themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. My return to people who say that is
Edited on Mon Jun-21-10 09:13 PM by nadinbrzezinski
Look I got ADD, and I wrote the radio handling policies for Emergency Workers in an ambulance service. EITHER DRIVE OR TALK ON THE RADIO, with the obvious exception off... HELP we are getting shot at! Or somethin' to that effect. Yes driver drives, partner uses the radio. Driver says en route before getting on route, and arrived at location, when fully stopped at location.

I know family in law enforcement here, and same rules apply, for the same reasons. Mostly there are enough risks on the job without getting stupid!

ADD I should be able to talk on radio and drive, I still know better.

:hi:

And thanks for the article, perhaps people will finally get it. I don't think so, but perhaps it will convince ONE person and even save their lives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 09:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. LOL!
Ain't it the truth!

I multitask at home--DU, cable news, classical music, e-mail, telephone. NEVER while driving (OK, maybe a CD and drinking water or coffee) or performing any task the distraction from which could produce a dangerous result that would REALLY ruin my day.

There's multitasking, and there's STUPID multitasking...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Some PDs that's how they assign P1 anymore
Edited on Mon Jun-21-10 09:16 PM by nadinbrzezinski
from what I have been told. This has been written into procedures...

For us it was simple, the law against it came from a chance conversation with the Governor of Baja California in the elevator. The guy was a Right Winger but his cousin got killed or injured in a wreck so that was an issue for him. So he had us keep stats for oh two years... and that was used to convince the Legislature to pass the law making it illegal. And since it was the Ambulance service and not the cops... it helped make the case better.

Oy the excel oy...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. It's always tougher to enact a general prohibition
There are always opponents who scream, "It's a government intrusion on personal freedom," when it's really a public health issue. The same thing happened during the advent of child safety seat and safety belt laws. Fortunately, those laws gradually were implemented, saving thousands of lives.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. I had to laugh today: I was reading an article about getting your house
organized/decluttered. The first page warned against multi-tasking as leading to doing several things poorly. The second page suggested combining tasks such as sorting clothes while on the phone.......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. hehehehehehhe that's funny
Still there are some simple tasks we can do while on the phone. I always wash dishes while chatting on the phone but I never drive while talking on the phone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. I do wish people wouldn't pee and talk on the phone at the same time.
It really is too much information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WCGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:25 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. I knew a politician who would do that kind of shit...
I was republsed by it.

He did it to everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. And here I was just talking about peeing.
Ewwww.... TMI!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lone_Star_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
29. Good point
Some things take more attention than others.

For example I can sort parts while dealing with the phone, but I can't do the books and the phone at the same time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ohheckyeah Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 09:18 PM
Response to Original message
8. Finally someone telling the truth
about the absurdity of multitasking. I've always known it was a myth and have always steered clear of job ads asking for a multitasker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. Witnessed a woman today..talking on her cellphone..drove right into the side of a truck while
Edited on Mon Jun-21-10 09:37 PM by BrklynLiberal
changing lanes. She NEVER looked...and started yelling at the truck driver, even tho the front left fender of her car was smashed into the midside of the truck.
The truck was driving slowly, with its flashers on. She did not want to wait for the car in front of her to make a right turn.
She pulled from the right lane into the left lane of a crowded, traffic-filled street...never hesitated.

I was behind her, and gave the truck driver my name and phone number in case he needed a witness.

The woman continued yelling at the truck driver even after everyone around her made it obvious that they had seen her on the phone.

She was a real BEE-ATCH.

Oh, did I mention that she was driving a nice, new shiny JAGUAR????????????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. One more fugging self-absorbed
jackass. She should be banned from driving.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 09:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. I can't tell you how often I saw someone coming in to merge on my right
holding traffic up because they were too busy talking on the phone. You could always tell when the conversation was over, because they'd come up on your left and blast past 3 minutes later!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Berry Cool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #13
18. They hold up lines, too. They don't move with the rest of the line because they're on the phone.
Then when they're finally pushed to the front, they're too busy talking on the phone to give the person waiting on them their full attention. It's the height of rudeness, not only to the person waiting on them but to everyone in line behind them, because of course waiting on them takes longer because they're trying to ask for what they want and talk on the phone at the same time. Then the person waiting on them may get their request wrong (of course, that wouldn't have anything to do with their own distractedness, oh no!) and then it has to be redone and they bitch about it and the people in line behind them get even angrier...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #18
20. I have been a witness to this as well. I work in retail, and when someone
comes into my store talking on a cellphone, I ignore them until they stop talking on the phone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnArmyVeteran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. Bush couldn't multitask! He couldn't walk & chew gum at the same time.
Let alone try to breathe and speak at the same time. We saw how that turned out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 10:45 PM
Response to Original message
15. That's not multitasking as I understand it.
As I understand it real multitasking means being able to go back and forth between tasks, not doing several tasks at once. Nobody can really do multiple tasks at once effectively, they are just good at going back and forth between individual tasks.

Whatever one means by it i know I suck at it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 10:17 AM
Response to Reply #15
25. Me too.
The article said it takes up to 25 minutes to recover from a distraction. For me I'm sure it's more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
keep_it_real Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
16. We can only give our "full attention" to one thing at a time
The key to multitasking is to have a cue in your mind of the next thing to give full attention too or the switching back and forth of full attention between things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
laruemtt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
17. seems just a mere few decades ago
the goal was to Be Here Now. how we've devolved.....................
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
19. K&R. Intense downsizing at work has pushed multi-tasking.
Need to keep pretending it is possible and efficient because putting more people on the job would cut into the Most Important part of modern business -- Quarterly Profits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. That's true. And almost every job description includes multitasking.
Because they've already laid off a lot of people, leaving the remaining workers to do the work formerly done by 2 or 3 people. Sucks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. that's me
12,13, 14 hours, usually no lunch / breaks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
22. True. Many people simply lack the ability to focus on one thing at a time.
There is a new personage out there who cannot engage in any normal communication without constantly looking into their hand held device for a flow of mainly useless information. Sending texts, receiving texts, checking emails, desperately searching for something else to distract from this moment.

Nothing communicates "I'm incapable of paying attention" like staring into the face of one's own cell phone, as if one has opened the Ark of the Covenant and is staring into its contents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 07:19 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. They drive me crazy
I can't bear it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #24
32. at work I notice it's mostly men who cannot multi-task
Edited on Tue Jun-22-10 10:32 PM by Skittles
hey, that's what I see
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
23. Whew- I thought this might have to do with having multiple windows open
along with several projects at a time.

:o
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Touchdown Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
27. I'd love to read this, but I have my wedding to plan, my wife to murder,
And Guilder to frame for it. I'm swamped!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
28. One more thing that's more dangerous than marijuana ... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skittles Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 10:29 PM
Response to Original message
31. what century is this guy in?
Edited on Tue Jun-22-10 10:33 PM by Skittles
it is normal at my job to be taking down systems while corresponding with five, six people via IM - many who are overseas and make no sense - and taking phone calls, for hours at a time, while on two conference calls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kat45 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
34. When you multitask, you're not paying total attention to any one task
And I believe that causes the tasks to not be done as well as they could and should be.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FionaMcG Donating Member (18 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 11:36 PM
Response to Original message
35. This may be true for males, but not for females.
Women are genetic multi taskers.... males, not so much (if at all). I notice the author did not make the distinction, his first, huge mistake.

I am not male bashing, merely making note of genetic differences in task approach.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-23-10 12:04 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. And I know for a fact that this isn't the case
when driving. Don't care what gender. We did NOT evolve to drive at 65 on 1.5 tons of steel, plastics and other materials.

Oh and I am a woman by the way... and welcome to DU.

(Oh and when I did keep stats for two years no, we did not notice any difference either)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC