Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Great picture of FDR with Katharine Hepburn

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 03:41 PM
Original message
Great picture of FDR with Katharine Hepburn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Kate may have liked FDR, but she LOVED Henry Wallace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Smart woman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. He was a liberal Republican. that's something you never see anymore.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Henry Wallace? The democratic socialist?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. ?? wikipedia information I thought was interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Link is broken.
To define Henry Wallace by the party he abandoned is disingenuous.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 12:43 AM
Response to Reply #27
31. Try this. It worked for me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #31
36. As I posted previously...

"To define Henry Wallace by the party he abandoned is disingenuous."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Okay, just stating a resource. Thought someone might enjoy the read.
It's cool.I had not heard of him before.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gold Metal Flake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. It's cool. Our exchange has bumped this thread for almost a full day!

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RoyGBiv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 01:17 AM
Response to Reply #17
33. The 1930s was a period of political realignment ...

A commonplace myth is that the Republican and Democratic parties have "switched sides" since the 1860s. Without going into the details of why this myth is mostly false, I'll simply note that the kernel of truth on which the myth is based begins to see full expression during this era. Indeed the number of people like Wallace who switched parties during this period is one reason the myth arose in the manner it did.

A "liberal Republican" in the 1930s was a descendant of people like Teddy Roosevelt, who was both a Republican and a Progressive. Wallace, as the previous respondent implied, was a dying breed within the Republican party. The response to the depression by each party convinced him that his personal ideology fit better within the Democrats.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
14. *I* loved Wallace. Awesome man, Henry Wallace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
18. She almost got blacklisted for a speech she gave at a Henry Wallace Rally
Katherine Hepburn . . . first became a target of anti-Communist threats in 1947 as a result of her outspoken support of liberal causes. For the first thirty years of her life she had little to do with politics, but in 1947 she held a great distaste for President Harry Truman and in 1948 she became a activist in the campaign to elect former Vice President Henry Wallace of the Progressive Party to the top position in the Unites States government (Klingaman 170). At an anti-censorship and pro-Wallace rally in Los Angeles, Hepburn made a defining speech introducing Wallace and addressing the topic of censorship. A man named Edward G. Robinson was originally supposed to make the speech, but Hepburn took over for the reasons she describes:

“He’s Jewish and very left of center,so he would certainly be suspected by that committee . My ancestors were ‘on the Mayflower’. There’s nothing that they can tack onto me. I’ve never been a member of any organization of any kind in my whole life. I’ll make the speech” (Hepburn 220).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Smarmie Doofus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #1
24. Rec for Henry Wallace.... the underappreciated. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #1
37. Nah
Spencer Tracy was the love of her life.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. No doubt there was alot of reciprocal charming going on there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 03:43 PM
Response to Original message
3. I don't have any heroes
Edited on Mon Jun-21-10 03:44 PM by Confusious
But he's one man I most admire.

This country need another one w/ balls like him. Man or woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Really hate that expression.
Really fucking hate it. The only reason "balls" is supposed to mean whatever it means to people is because only men are supposed to be capable of that whatever-it-is. It's sexist from the start, and not qualifier makes it less so. It's like saying "Mighty white of you," or "very articulate for a black man" or other such backhanded compliments.

In case anyone cares to know. Wasn't upset with you, I just hate that expression with every liberal and egalitarian fiber of my being.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mopinko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. i prefer huevos.
which kinda cracks my up to see the defining male characteristic turned into the defining female characteristic. i don't like 'balls' to describe courage, either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Sorry, I don't view expressions through a filter like yours
Edited on Mon Jun-21-10 04:27 PM by Confusious
When someone says it, I hear it just as "has courage," with no sexist overtones. I know some people have a problem with filters and tend to view this or that with those filters on all the time,

so that's why I put man or woman.

"every liberal and egalitarian fiber of my being."

I don't view PC as egalitarian. I view it as trying to control. You can to do it physically or mentally. PC is mental. And a waste of time. It doesn't change minds or change views, it just stops people from using words.

And if that's all you have to say about a post about a person who was probably the greatest president this country has ever had, it shows how much those filters are in control.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. I don't see what's filtered or "PC" about it (not that PC is a bad thing)
It's sexist. That's not about filters or PC or any other chaff. Men have balls. All men have balls. Every president has had balls. You want a president who has balls like FDR? You got every other one to pick from. You didn't praise him, you neutralized him.

As for the whole "PC" thing, language is exactly where all prejudices hide. When you aren't aware of what you are saying, you often aren't aware of your prejudice or how you are spreading it. When I was growing up "PC" was just called manners. I remember when Rush and the conservative whine brigade tried to make the efforts to fight prejudice into some negative, labeling it "PC" and attaching that phrase to everything they wanted to belittle. I'm just still heartbroken that liberals fell for that easy claptrap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 03:29 AM
Response to Reply #30
34. What's so sexist about it.
Edited on Tue Jun-22-10 03:37 AM by Confusious
I don't see it. A woman can have balls too. Never said a woman can't have courage. You're the only one saying that.

Oh I see. You're thinking in terms of sex, sex, sex. Men have a penis and women don't. that sort of thing. You can't seem to see beyond that into a more abstract term.

You didn't praise him, you neutralized him.


Your thinking is wack. 98% of people would agree with how I used the words. You are the first person to ever ever say that about the term.

language is exactly where all prejudices hide. When you aren't aware of what you are saying, you often aren't aware of your prejudice or how you are spreading it.


Where'd you get that from? the PC convention? It hides in people's minds. Picking a different word or not using a word isn't going to change a behavior or make them treat people different. You have to change minds. Words are an easy out. Makes you think you're doing something, when you're really not.

If they can't use one word, they'll just use others - "that person" "those people" They seems to use a lot of "code words" these days.

If you change the mind, they won't use the words anymore.

You're a dog chasing its tail. You catch it, it hurts, you start again. It's never ending.

and PC was never manners. I spent half my childhood in the south. It was never manners.

I'm just still heartbroken that liberals fell for that easy claptrap.


No, didn't hear about it from rush. Sorry, I take everything with a grain of salt, and once I had had my fill, I made my decision, and I didn't really care for the personalities of the people pushing it, nor did I think it would make any sort of difference.

Of course, I'm sure I will see you post a protest of "sexist" when someone calls someone else a dick, won't I?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoBotherMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 09:53 AM
Response to Reply #34
35. How about moxie?
That's a good neutral word that doesn't offend me. :hi: Dana ; )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #35
38. Katherine Harris ruined that one for me.
And Lou hates spunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. +1,000
That is why he was elected to the highest office of our land four times, and why people felt so passionately about him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Confusious Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. People named their children after him

Like my great-uncle, Franklin Delano.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I can imagine they did. One of his great grandsons lives in my town.
The local paper ran a story on him. The great grandson seems like a cool kid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
closeupready Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 03:46 PM
Response to Original message
5. I like that picture.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
6. I'm glad I never met Hepburn.
Edited on Mon Jun-21-10 03:48 PM by Gidney N Cloyd
I'm a major fan of her work but something just tells me I'd find her incredibly irritating in person.

On edit: she'd probably find me incredibly irritating, too. Most people seem to.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
7. misplaced.
Edited on Mon Jun-21-10 03:49 PM by The Wielding Truth
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 04:10 PM
Response to Original message
12. Here's another shot from the same picnic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Scuba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. My favorite President. My favorite actress. Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
applegrove Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 10:35 PM
Response to Reply #13
29. Yes the juxtaposition of those two is great. I like them both.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proteus_lives Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
15. FDR was quite the ladies man.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #15
19. From what I can tell, he had good taste.
Particularly, the woman he chose to marry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Indeed.
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
25. Here's a man who had wealth and privilege BUT
was he a republican and did he believe in corporate dictatorship. Heck no. He was a man for the people. He believed in this COUNTRY FOLKS and not corporation rule.

Why do you think Prescott Bush and the big robber baron companies wanted to overthrow the government. Shows they were not very good at sizing people up. They picked a man who also loved America to try to overthrow it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. he had compassion and lot's of common sense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beringia Donating Member (193 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-21-10 09:41 PM
Response to Original message
28. She has a lot of bobby pins in her hair
to give her that bouncy look.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swamp Rat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
32. Man, I really love Kate... 'rally I doo.'
:loveya: :loveya: :loveya:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wielding Truth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-22-10 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #32
40. Cute... me too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC