Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Now that Rachel is explaining the FUNGIBLE nature

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:57 PM
Original message
Now that Rachel is explaining the FUNGIBLE nature
of the oil bidness can the rest of you get it why a BOYCOTT won't work?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. I hope this vid goes viral - most Americans have no idea how it works. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. And some of us TRIED hard to explain it
to the scorn of many. But since she is on the teve, perhaps they will believe her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:01 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Do you know where to look for the video? We can make it go viral. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Once they post it at the Rachel Maddow show
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 08:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. Our vehicles wouldn't work either. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gateley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm recording it so am looking forward to watching. I always learn so much from her. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Towlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
6. If more people understood what she just said it could make all the difference in the world.
This really does need to get spread around to everyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. And I got a small model of that here in town
all our gas comes from a single distribution point. ALL OF IT... no matter who or what is selling it at the point of sale.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. Agreed, but the more important message is that "drill here, drill now"
and using American oil is utter bullshit.

That's the key thing that lunkhead motherfuckers need to grasp. Ineffective boycotts are a comparative non-issue.

DOMESTIC PRODUCTION IS IRRELEVANT AND THE PRODUCT IS JUST AS LIKELY (IF NOT MORE SO) TO END UP IN CHINA AS IOWA.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:10 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yep, we also tried to 'xplain that
but what we, just internet posters, know.

We need to move to a post oil civilization, I am not counting on that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. I hear ya. It would seem pretty obvious if the bullshit was discredited
Then if we could maintain focus long enough to explain true cost things and viewpoints would be on a very different track so fast that heads would spin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Well speaking of TRUE costs
I bought a hat the other day when we went hiking. Silly me, I LEFT MINE AT HOME. The hat was 10 bucks, round numbers, made in China. True cost, if we took into account environmental degradation, and energy cost, closer to 25. It is just heavily subsidized.

The Netbook I am using right now, close to 1000 bucks.

I could go on... but most of those costs are invisible to the average American...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. You get it, gurl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
14. I wish that she'd spent more time on that
She needs expand that piece a bit, like she's done with the Gulf "cleanup". I consider myself to be an intelligent person, but I didn't know that oil drilled in American waters go onto the world market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. It's not something they publish
and don't feel bad, many of our politicos don't either. In fact, I'd not be too surprised if both McCain and Kerry didn't either. This is not common knowledge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:32 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. you think our leaders don't know that basic detail about industrial nations life blood?
really?

you would have to be naive in the extreme to think our leaders are not acutely aware of ever aspect of the oil trade business.

they may not know much about how it gets harvested, or BOPs and such, but they are acutely aware of how it is distributed, and where it is.

it is literally what make the world go round, and vital for our super power status.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. Having spoken to a few people in the Congress and the Senate
over the years... no I don't think so. A few of them are very aware of it... the President perhaps, but no, not really.

And yes, I have talked over the course of the years with one former President (who was very aware of it, some might say he was a visionary. And one of his frustrations was the ignorance, some might say willful ignorance, of the House and the Senate)... three US Senators and two House Members... as well as three State Reps, one for one state, the other two for another, and it is damn scary just how little they either chose to know or actually know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
31. sorry, i am not buying it. this is what makes the world go round, we fight wars over it
maybe some freshman don't know, but our senior leaders certainly know.

remember when we went into iraq, what was the first thing we did, secure the oil.

they know what is going on, they just like to play dumb for teeVee (read US).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #31
32. If they understood the true nature of it
they would not have to go fight over it.

I mean it don't matter if the oil is extracted by Mexico, Venezuela, Russia, Norway or the left handed widget. It all ends in the same place, the fungible world market.

And no, they are not freshmen... and the free clue as to what President I was talking about, Carter. He was the only one who truly got it, and was extremely frustrated with his Congress. Why? THEY DID NOT GET IT.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. sorry, but i think that is naive in the extreme
do you also not believe we are an empire with global reach?

the PTB of a global empire understand very clearly how important vital resources are, and will kill scores of people, and countries to control them.

our recent history demonstrates that very clearly, not to mention all of recorded history.

only those ignorant of empires and their history would believe otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 12:19 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. What that our leaders are naive in the extreme on a few subjects?
We are a world empire, in decline. That does not mean that every jack tom and harry in Congress gets the last details of how you run that empire or why it runs. Hell you think Roman Senators understood the importance of Salt or why the Legions marched on new salt deposits for the glory of Rome? Pick up some Seneca for example, and you will find out that no, they did not. Just like our people do not know the last infinite detail of how the empire works.

Now the people in charge of the Legions did, just as the Department of Defense (and not all in DOD, just the people in planning and logistics, who get it to infinite detail) does today.

Hell if you asked the average Imperial Officer in the Legajo de Indias about the details of any of the Colonies in the New World, they KNEW silver came from the mines, but the details of extraction, no, not really.

If you asked the average MP how the colonies ran in the New World, they had no clue... now the Prime Minister did. And for that matter, King George III could have avoided that little soiree called the American Revolution if he got the real reason for the conflict, which he never did...

Just because somebody is a big shot in Congress don't necessarily mean they know the last detail of EVERYTHING they deal with. As one Senator put it to me, that's what we have RESEARCH STAFF. They don't have time to read every fucking briefing they should be readying, or for that matter every Bill that comes before them. And to think that they are masters of all is actually quite naive on your part. Oh and that Senator was, and still is the ranking member of a few Committees.


By the way, I will gladly compare history degrees.

BA in History, with a minor in Poli Sci
Masters in History

And after readying quite a bit into the history of Empires, no, not the myths, the real stuff. I have come to the realization that a few individuals have command of the essential stuff but not all of those involved in Government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 12:51 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. no. i am saying that only the naive, or ignorant, would believe that...
our senior leaders in the senate are ignorant about THE vital resource of our time

and i am not talking about 'all' the details (as i've said before) i am talking about the big picture, in particular, the trading and whereabouts of that vital resource, and the role it plays in our empire.

since you are well versed in history, i will assume that you are naive then to think otherwise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 01:03 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. They get the big picture
but how fungible oil is in the world market is not big picture. big picture is where wells are, where threats to them come. How the oil gets from a well, to your local refinery is the equivalent of asking a member of the Legajo de Indias to explain to you, how silver reached Cadiz. As far as they were concerned, which is the same level as our people... well shit, silver goes to the mint in Lima or Mexico City... oil goes from the rig to the shore by pipe or ship. Then silver is loaded onto a Carabelle, oil is loaded on a tanker... and it arrives at Cadiz where it goes to the Royal Distribution at Madrid at El Real, oil goes down to the refinery and from there to your car. Yes there are major pieces of the process missing.

Neither of these two groups got the fine details... which in this case is... you have a world market and it don't matter where you extract the damn thing, it still goes into a world market controlled by five to seven major companies.

That is not big picture but part of the boring details that hopefully this disaster in the Gulf is teaching them. The other boring detail I hope, but cannot count on, that this is teaching them is that we NEED TO GET OFF OIL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 01:14 AM
Response to Reply #37
39. which would include the oil market. where it comes from, where it goes, and the security required to
Edited on Fri Jun-18-10 01:15 AM by ShamelessHussy
keep it functioning, as well as an understanding as to how VITAL it is to our role of global empire.

Senior members of the senate fully understand that oil is traded on a global market, with the operational security maintained and ensured by US.

that is my only point.

the general public may be just waking up to this fact, however TPTB, understand it very well, as they created it, and maintain it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #39
45. You don't get it, and that's ok
our senior members in the House and the Senate are quite ignorant of how the boring details work.

If you need to believe they KNOW all this stuff, more power to you, but they don't. There are some conversations we have had with ranking members that I suspect would make your head explode. Suffice it to say, we ARE like any other Empire, where the cogs in the machine, and even leaders of government, DO NOT know the boring details... we are not special, or exceptional, and once the American Empire goes away (that is coming in my lifetime, and it will be quite "sudden") and historians are able to look under the hood... then and ONLY THEN will people realize just how average these people are, and how ignorant of things you think they know, they are.

Oh and this has nothing to do with party either.

Now if you want to know WHO are the people who actually get it? Or at least much better, see that research staff... but that is THEIR JOB. why these days I'd rather speak to that staff than members... and yes, I have had those conversations... No, I am not special, I am just a bothersome constituent that could and should send the staff Christmas Gifts. Perhaps this year I'll send them a card to the office. Gifts are kind of a no-no... but I guess I can get away with a card.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #45
52. Sure, they don't get that oil is sold in a global market place, with prices set by the market
Pandering to our ignorance is what they do best.

Think about it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnieBW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 09:38 PM
Response to Reply #32
51. Carter was an engineer
and a very smart man. I would imagine that he had to learn that stuff in a hurry when the Oil Crisis happened. And, in the late 1970's, I'm sure that "energy independence" was a good idea. Unfortunately, the global dependence on oil, and the commodities-buying system has grown significantly since then. But, it still makes a good slogan.

Personally, I agree with Obama that we need to move to a smart grid with at least 50% of electricity coming from solar, wind, or other, renewable means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #31
44. remember Iraqi oil was nationalized
our taxpayer money, our lives, was to make damn sure that the oil corporations could get it--nothing more. It does not benefit "we the people", it benefits greedy oil companies. Just like United Fruit crying to Uncle Sam because a newly elected leader would need to take back some of the land for their people and up taxes on the company. You do remember those death squads? And, it wasn't to stop those damn communists.

Our money, our blood is wasted to aid corporations-corporations to steal resources or turn profits for war profiteering. "Little Boots" privatizes services in the military and allows companies like Blackwater carte blanche in Iraq and Afghanistan--our soldiers wind up suffering from tainted water and poor services and civilians are killed by mercenaries. While, those corporations charge us billions of dollars-when the government could have done it cheaper and better. I mean, if you're a soldier cook-you're going to eat the food like all of the other soldiers-instead of have shite served and being charged outrageous prices for other services. And don't forget the "slave workers", some who were forced from other countries, to work for these war profiteering corporations?

No, General Smedley Butler was right--"war IS a racket."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #44
48. ^ Exact. Best post on DU in days! ^ n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
treestar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
15. Oh once Fake President Rachel says something
It must be true. :sarcasm:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:20 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Actually this is true
go on, kill the messenger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. LOL!
:rofl:

Tell the truth!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. Some folks have problems with it
what galls me is that some of us DU'ers have been trying to explain this as well since the accident happened, and why a boycott against BP would be at best an accounting error. Not that this was a popular message and I guess for some folks this message goes against their way to see the world... which is very simplistic. If we boycott Coldstone Creamery and it works, why shouldn't it work with BP? For starters the economies of scale at play here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mimosa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #15
49. I get tired of Rachel worship too
She seldom says anything most of us don't already know. The worship must come because people think somebody who cogently expresses what they already believe must be a genius.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. This is not Rachel worship
And if you believe MOST Americans know this little detail, you are quite ignorant of the true nature of the knowledge Americans have. If they knew this, then the ENERGY INDEPENDENCE canard would not work like it does, now would it?

And sometimes, which is a sad fact of life, you need a talking head saying the same things anonymous internet poster have been saying for those facts to finally register.

She made a critical observation WELL BEFORE she entered your consciousness, you know back in the early days of Air America... if it did not happen in TV, well it did not happen. That was a brilliant observation on the nature of the American people and we have seen this happen here over and over again.

And like it or not she is brilliant in her own way... and people LISTEN to her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ilsa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. I only saw the last ten minutes. She's awesome at explaining
these big topics in ways anyone can understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:25 PM
Response to Reply #16
21. Yes that she is
but some folks really have a problem with the message. She is a policy wonk... and it shows, in a good way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:21 PM
Response to Original message
19. I can still boycott a bit. It won't matter, but it does to my conscience.
I went an extra mile last week to buy Hugo Chavez's gas for a penny more a gallon. He hasn't pissed me off. I'm plotting to get off gas altogether.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Good luck in getting off gas altogether
you plan to stop using computers? Or more basically, you plan to stop eating?

That said if this makes you feel better, by all means. Our minds are important as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:31 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Don't be silly. I know I can't afford to do those things, but every tiny
bit has to help.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:48 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Actually we all need to get off oil
just that the changes in our life style sum up in one sentence... "The American Way of Life is OVER."

No President will be able to say this and survive. This is what is so damn maddening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShamelessHussy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:53 PM
Response to Reply #19
29. yes, and if many folks did just that, it may actually lead to alternative sources of energy
just what we need, so you go girl :toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uzybone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:50 PM
Response to Original message
27. Fake president Rachel talks and DU creams its pants
Edited on Thu Jun-17-10 11:50 PM by Uzybone
real Rachel talks about the uselessness of a BP only boycott and ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 11:54 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. They don't want to hear it
and Rachel is late to the party. A few of us on DU have spoken at length about it, as well as Hartmann who did go into it in detail as well. Now when one person says it, ok... but when a few start speaking about this, I would expect (not really any more) that people would at least try to use the google. This is not well known info, but it is out there in the interwebs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dorkulon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 12:11 AM
Response to Original message
34. I suppose one could still boycott oil altogether.
But I wouldn't envy them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 01:11 AM
Response to Original message
38. So, oil is like a mushroom?
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PufPuf23 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 01:21 AM
Response to Original message
40. Wall Street and academia has taken me seriously about paper pulp
in a past life.

Yes oil is fungible and the leading producers are international corporations.

Still there is no excuse for exporting environmental damage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 01:54 AM
Response to Original message
41. Are the retail outlets corporate or franchise?
If BP owns them, then yes a boycott will still hurt.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishwax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 09:51 AM
Response to Reply #41
42. They're almost all franchises, but pay 10%+ of gross revenues to BP
in addition to paying BP for the gas, wherever it comes from.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #41
46. If you manage to have an effect
it will be more like an accounting error.

See there is this thing called economies of scales.

Their bidness is less than 5% world wide, at the retail level. Good luck having an effect anybody will notice at that level. I mean, their quarterly income is ... larger than the national GNP of a few countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newspeak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 10:09 AM
Response to Original message
43. For years politicians have used "we have to be oil independent" as a meme
in their campaigns. See, we wouldn't have to depend on the ME, if we were only independent. Too bad, many people in this country don't know that the oil, drilled and refined by American and foreign business entities, all goes to the market. Coincidently, I had an opinion poll call the other night, where I was asked if our country should become more independent from foreign oil. I laughed and told her, how are we going to do that without new innovative alternative energy, since the oil companies are the ones dictating policy? We don't own our own oil--our government sells the leases to our land to their best friends or the highest bidder (some of those mining and oil leases are pretty damned cheap).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-18-10 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #43
47. I am almost looking fowards to THAT POLL
Teachable moment and all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC