Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"SC Dems hearing protest over US Senate primary"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Adsos Letter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 01:17 PM
Original message
"SC Dems hearing protest over US Senate primary"
Source: AP
By MEG KINNARD (AP)

COLUMBIA, S.C. — South Carolina's Democrats are gathering Thursday to decide whether to overturn the results of the primary election in which an unemployed, unknown military veteran won the nomination for U.S. Senate.

The state party's 92-member executive committee is meeting in Columbia to hear a protest by former state lawmaker Vic Rawl. Earlier this week, Rawl filed an official protest of the primary results, arguing that malfunctions in voting machines or software may have caused him to lose the June 8 Democratic primary to political unknown Alvin Greene.

Greene, 32, stunned the party establishment when he defeated Rawl in the June 8 primary to see who would face GOP U.S. Sen. Jim DeMint, the heavy favorite in the fall.

Earlier this week, Greene told The Associated Press he would neither attend the hearing nor send a representative.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
1. Heard on NPR this morning that they can hold a new primary or...
...give the nomination to Rawl, in addition to certifying the results.

Can't imagine them letting it stand as is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-17-10 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. Without evidence of malfeasance....
I don't see what the justification is.

I could see if this was going to be a close race or something. But to overturn election results that they don't like, and setting that precedent,for a seat we don't have a chance in hell of winning? Doesn't make sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC