Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Mass layoffs at hospitals hit new highs

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SarahB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 10:28 AM
Original message
Mass layoffs at hospitals hit new highs
Cuts of 50 employees or more at hospitals are affecting more workers than at any time since Hurricane Katrina, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data. And indications are that this pace will not abate soon.

While most of the layoffs have come from administrative and trades staff, in some places -- particularly publicly run hospitals or systems that serve relatively large Medicaid and uninsured populations -- clinical staff is also starting to be thinned.

In Miami, the Service Employees International Union has filed a quality-of-care lawsuit against the publicly owned Jackson Health System. Recent layoffs included physicians and nurses among the 613 positions cut, 400 in early May.

"It's really not about the governance structure. It's more a matter of the particular economic circumstances of the community and how that affects the finances of the hospital," said Bruce Rueben, president and CEO of the Florida Hospital Assn.

In April, 1,967 hospital employees were affected by mass layoffs, according to the BLS. That would be a record-high total but for the 8,687 employees cut in September 2005, mostly due to hospital shutdowns in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.
Hospitals had 18 mass layoffs in April 2010, the most since 21 in July 2009.

There were 18 mass layoff events in April, the most since the 21 in July 2009. (September 2005 had 30.) Through the first four months of 2010, the number of hospital mass layoffs were on pace to eke past 2009's record of 152, and smash 2005's record of 13,282 affected employees.

http://www.ama-assn.org/amednews/2010/06/14/bisb0614.htm

Let's see if this gets as much attention as the thread about the phony-baloney Federal Reserve statement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
prolesunited Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 10:30 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sure this won't have a negative effect on patient care.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samplegirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
2. Our hospital here is being taken over
by Ardent a Tennessee based company. Bye bye Union!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
philly_bob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
3. A public option would have reduced needed clerical staff.
I despair. Laying off clinical nursing staff and school teachers. During high unemployment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
4. I think to hear the truth about these layoffs we need more info.
A very close friend of mine is a VP at the largest health care system in Pgh, Pa. Several month ago one of our conversations turned to hospitals closings. When I moved from Pgh. in 1987, every hospital had a natal maternity unit & was delivering babies etc & there was a large woman's hospital (McGee). McGee is closed, and only ONE hospital in Pgh. delivers babies. I was shocked and I asked why. She explained that there simply has been a drastic reduction in births & they couldn't justify maintaining maternity units in every hospital. I questioned if th only remaining hosp. that still did deliveries wasn't overwhelmed with too many deliveries, and she said the average # was 14 per week! Also patients admitted for other reasons simply don't stay in the hospital very long. All of these changes have forced hospitals to consolidate and close some. Th same has happened to schools across the country!

The report of all these layoffs & terminations sounds terrible on the surface, ut I'd be interested to find out WHY they occurred.

My husband was hospitalized for 2 days recently & I was sent for an emergency MRI oly 3 weeks ago, and there was absolutly no shortage of personnel in either the hosp. or the MRI Center. My wait was so short, I had to finish the sign-in paperwork in the room whre they performed the MRI.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dappleganger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-14-10 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. One can't help but wonder if the reduced number of in-patient care days is due to HMO requirements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC