Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What BP knew and when they knew it

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
pokerfan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 06:12 PM
Original message
What BP knew and when they knew it
BP knew where it would go, that ecology would never recover, "No toxicity studies" on dispersants.

Xeni Jardin at 2:56 PM Friday, Jun 4, 2010



Karen Dalton Beninato at neworleans.com writes,

I have obtained a copy of the almost-600-page BP Regional Oil Spill Response Plan for the Gulf of Mexico as of June, 2009, thanks to an insider. Some material has been redacted, but these are the three main takeaways from an initial read. The name of the well has been redacted, but if it's not Deepwater Horizon, then there's another rig still out there pumping oil and aimed at Plaquemines Parish.

The three big takeaways, excerpted from Beninato's blog post:

1) In the worst case discharge scenario (on chart below), an oil leak was expected to come ashore with highest probability in Plaquemines Parish within 30 days

2) Spokespersons were advised never to assure the public that an ecosystem would be back to normal after the worst case scenario, which we are now living through.

3) Corexit oil dispersant toxicity has not been tested on ecosystems, according to the Oil Spill Response Plan. "Ecotoxilogical effects: No toxicity studies have been conducted on this product."

Link to 583-page, 17 megabyte PDF (publicintelligence.net)

http://www.boingboing.net/2010/06/04/bps-spill-plan-leaks.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. BP has 2 missions..
1. Make money
2. Lie about anything that will interfere with #1.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. One more mission: Destroy eco areas so as to drill baby drill some more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Good thought...
What's to lose now that those areas are useless for any other purpose?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 07:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Certainly. You make swiss cheese with so many holes it just falls apart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Win-win for the Death Cult. They despise anything living anyway so it's all good. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 06:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Bing-effing-o
Simple; effective.

I'm sure they knew well in advance that all of these "fixes" weren't going to work... they are buying time for some reason...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. If they knew they wouldn't work, why spend so much money trying to get them to work?
There's that logic problem popping up again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 06:46 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I don't have all the answer... neither do you...
How much money has AIG and other insurers paid out on this? How much money being spent is actually from BP? You don't know any more than I do.
There are zero deep ocean oil drilling experts on DU... I wouldn't be so quick to shut down discussion. THAT isn't logical at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. No, I don't have an answer to your false premise.
False premise if false.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. You don't know that... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. I don't know if Santa Clause told you to reply that way.
But there's this thing called logic that says no, no he probably didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC