As the corporate media continues to try to blame the oil spill on the Obama administration, and ignore the fact that Republicans received more than 70 percent of all oil and gas industry campaign contributions, the media also ignores the fact that the Obama administration has proposed stricter safety rules, which were opposed by BP and Republicans.
Of course, now the media just gives Republicans a free pass to attack the Obama administration while ignoring the efforts of these same Republicans to expand offshore oil drilling and weaken regulations. The biggest example? Bobby Jindal who sponsored the 2006 legislation lifting the moratorium on off shore oil drilling.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704471204575209331720726738.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_MIDDLENexttoWhatsNewsTop
As BP PLC defended its handling of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico, documents show it argued against new, stricter safety rules proposed last year by the U.S. agency that oversees offshore drilling.
The British oil giant was one of several companies that wrote to the U.S. Minerals Management Service this past September saying additional regulation of the oil industry was unnecessary. In a letter, BP said the current voluntary system of safety procedures was adequate.
* * *
As BP touted the scale of the cleanup, documents showed that it was one of several companies that opposed efforts to tighten up safety procedures offshore. Last year, the MMS studied more than 1,400 offshore incidents that led to 41 deaths and hundreds of injuries between 2001 and 2007. Many of them, the MMS found, were linked to factors such as communications failures, a lack of written procedures and the failure of supervisors to enforce existing rules, and proposed mandatory requirements to reduce the number of incidents. That would have replaced a system under which many safety procedures were voluntary.
In a letter published on the U.S. government Web site Regulations.gov, Richard Morrison, BP's vice president for Gulf of Mexico production, wrote that while BP "is supportive of companies having a system in place to reduce risk, accidents, injuries and spills, we are not supportive of the extensive, prescriptive regulations as proposed in this rule."
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
