Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Macy's exec to newspapers: Get that war news off your front pages

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Newsjock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 01:05 PM
Original message
Macy's exec to newspapers: Get that war news off your front pages
http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003582260

An executive with one of the newspaper industry’s largest advertisers told a room full of publishers to change the product or get left behind.

Anne MacDonald, president and chief marketing officer, Macy’s corporate marketing, delivered a blunt and critical analysis of the industry during this morning’s presentation at the Newspaper Association of America’s annual conference, now in its third day, here.

... “Macy’s is taking steps to increase and the efficiency of our spend. In this environment, newspapers will get left behind.”

... MacDonald said that newspapers should push local, not national and international content, to the front. “That is your differentiation but that is not what someone sees,” she observed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mitchleary Donating Member (271 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. It would be a shame
if they printed both. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 01:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. NightWatcher to Macy's: Fuck you
if you want to have "happy happy news" on the front page to help sell your ads, put your money behind getting the troops home instead of pushing them to the back pages.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Huh... imagine corporate sponsors dictating what should be news
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
4. Time to tell Macy's to stick it in their ass -- CONSUMERS tell them
How frigging DARE these people attempt to DICTATE what is put in a newspaper! Arrogant bastards. :rant:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MUAD_DIB Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
5. Don't sell news! Sell happiness!

Another step in the long decline of America. "Hide the truth. people want pablum, and if they don't then fuck em!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chipper Chat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #5
15. Brave New Murka.
All we need are SOMA holidays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
6. Do you need more evidence of fascism inherent in the system?
Government uses business for its purposes and vice versa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here is Macy's contact page... tell them what their servile drivel reeks of.
Edited on Tue May-08-07 01:23 PM by BushDespiser12
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Done.
They lost a customer today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. This is pantload. Print media is struggling period.
If Macy's buys less print ads that's only because print media is on the decline. It has nothing to do with Eyerack.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
9. Please, marketing weasels, stay out of journalism.
Oh, and Macy's, how's that Marshall Field changeover in Chicago workin' out for ya? Sales good? No? So sorry.
Stick to parades, geniuses.
Ha-ha-ha-HA-ha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Red Zelda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 01:24 PM
Original message
Can newspapers tell Macy's what to do, too?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orwell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
10. Maybe we can get Hugo Boss...
...to do a redesign of the desert camo uniforms. Macy's can come out with a whole new line of Boss 'killer outfits' for the summer season.

After all, blind patriotism is so sexy. Just ask any country western star.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 01:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. That is so wrong. I shop at Macy's. I also ignore the local paper
because they DON'T report news. They always have some story about a local garden or some such crap on the front page; you have to dig to find real news at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
13. Dr. Phool to Macy's
You know that Macy's Visa card you mailed my wife two weeks ago? You can hear it scream from the scissors job it's getting in about 3 hours when she gets home.

We never shopped there, but my niece who got married over the week-end was registered there. We sent her a nice gift, and you sent us a Visa. In fact, your bill came in today's mail. It will be paid in full in about 15 minutes, and you can stick it up your ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. That is how you deal with Macy's
Boycott!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zalinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 02:16 PM
Response to Original message
16. Did any of you read the article?
She makes sense. Newspapers are stuck back in the 50's when they could do what ever they wanted with out promoting themselves. And why should a national store have to contact each and every paper that is within the media's hold to place an ad. She has valid points.

zalinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
17. That's really not what she said. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
18. macys, here's a clue; good or bad news, the economy is tanking. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. WHOA! Wait a minute! Read the article! Don't rely on these selective quotes.
She does NOT say take the Iraq War off the front page. (And I don't know about you-all, but the Iraq War is mostly NOT on the front page of my local rag. It's mostly relegated to p. 3 or further back.) She says that newspaper circulation is down. And that makes newspapers a less useful market for advertising. And that is TRUE. Two of the things she advises are newspapers becoming more appealing to women age 25-54, and to minority women (Macy's customers), and emphasizing local news. And before you react to that, as her saying 'take the war off the front page' (which she didn't say), consider something she DOESN'T say (but which is a corollary of what she said), that, as conglomerates eat up the TV/radio venues, and cut back on LOCAL reporting staffs, the LOCAL basis of democracy (all democracy is local) is undercut. No one's watching the court house, local corrupt city councilpersons and developers, no one's reporting on the privatization of local parks, or the scandals in local elderly care, or digging deep into why the local hospital is closing, or why the city council is giving land and tax break to Walmart, or who or what is counting your votes, or where local jobs are going, or all the other LOCAL issues that are touchpoints between ordinary citizens and national policy.

Lack of in-depth coverage of local news is, in fact, a democracy issue. People see headlines written by war profiteering corporate news monopolies and fascists, that don't seem relevant. These headlines don't say, "Bush Cartel Still Robbing Your Pocketbook to Kill Iraqis for their Oil." They are dreary, dead headlines, and articles, that make blood for oil, and the mind-boggling costs of it all, seem inevitable, unstoppable, and not relevant to YOU. They might as well not write about it, and instead cover local scandals or local positive democracy efforts (if they would). Even the local garden clubs (are they gardening organically? are they helping to "green" America?), or the local Audubon Society and its annual bird count, or a local group doing an AIDs benefit, or local safety and emergency services issues. The bricks of democracy. These receive almost no coverage any more--and certainly not in-depth coverage--with NY and DC-based (or Hong Kong-based, or Dubai-based) global corporate predators owning and controlling all news and opinion in the traditional venues. So, if local newspapers would start filling this gap, much more seriously than they do--started covering what the majority of people are actually doing, in their community and political lives, and how local people see things, it would be revolutionary. Fuck DC! Democracy is LOCAL!

Secondly, something else she doesn't say--but which could be implied from the losses in the newsprint business--this deadly dull, evil, lying, deceitful "news" coverage (I should say, "news" manufacture) of national and international events, that creeps out like a disease from AP to all newsprint, is turning readers off, not because they are not interested in national and international news, but because they are increasingly aware that what they read is bunk. IF these newspapers told them something they needed to know--if they told the truth--newspapers would become hot items again. The remedy to declining newsprint is patently obvious. Do your job! Tell the truth! Expose corruption! Champion the people! The people of this country would shout with joy to see that headline: "Bush Cartel Still Robbing Your Pocketbook to Kill Iraqis." They would subscribe to your newspaper in droves, because they would know that they were being given something real--real journalism--in exchange for their money and their attention to your ads.

No, the Macy's P.R. lady doesn't say this, but you know it's true. And she implied it, in a way. She was saying that people don't find value in newspapers. Many feel there is no reason to read them. Just the same old crap there. More lies. And you can't even find out why your downtown is dying and Wal-Mart is coming in, or, why, suddenly, there is no more garbage collection at your local park down the street, or why, a few months after that, its trees are being felled and the grass ripped up for a new real estate development.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC