Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OK -- Here's my preposterous suggestion re shutting off BP well . . .

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:09 PM
Original message
OK -- Here's my preposterous suggestion re shutting off BP well . . .
Let's round up ONE . . . maybe TWO . . .

no longer used submaries --

Sit them down on top of the well and just leave them there ....



Anyone else have their own preposterous suggestion?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. think they might not be able to descend that far
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:19 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Think they can -- this well is at 5,000 feet? Subs go to 35,000 ft....
The deepest deep diving submarine to date is Trieste. On October 5, 1959 Trieste departed San Diego for Guam aboard the freighter Santa Maria to participate in Project Nekton, a series of very deep dives in the Mariana Trench. On January 23, 1960, Trieste reached the ocean floor in the Challenger Deep (the deepest southern part of the Mariana Trench), carrying Jacques Piccard (son of Auguste) and Lieutenant Don Walsh, USN.<8> This was the first time a vessel, manned or unmanned, had reached the deepest point in the Earth's oceans. The onboard systems indicated a depth of 11,521 metres (37,799 ft), although this was later revised to 10,916 metres (35,814 ft) and more accurate measurements made in 1995 have found the Challenger Deep to be slightly shallower, at 10,911 metres (35,797 ft).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine#Submersion_and_trimming

and those are long ago subs --

You'd have to find a way to lay them down on the well --

and get whomever is in it out -- unless they can also be robotically controlled???

Bet we have a few of these things still laying around??



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Webster Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. The Trieste is one of a kind.
Most subs are limited to 1500 feet or something. Some others are good for 4000 feet. There are deeper diving subs, but nobody wants to scrap them.

In any event, it wouldn't do shit. The oil and gas under pressure would just push them aside or flow around them. We're talking about 13,000 psi.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. Yep . . . was surprised to find that they can't go very deep . . .!!
How deep can you go in a submarine?
U.S. Navy submarines can submerge deeper than 800 feet. The actual depth is classified, but it is less than the deep-diving U.S. Navy-supported civilian research submarines that explore the bottom of the oceans.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:15 PM
Response to Original message
2. I was thinking maybe the cast of Armageddon. Bruce Willis did play the world's best
deep core oil driller. They saved the Earth from Comet Dottie, why not the BP Gusher? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
3. Dump a file of rocks, ranging in size from small to large
with the smallest lowest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. Well, that's beyond preposterous . . . let's get back to the subs ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:30 PM
Response to Reply #5
28. Wow, must be some good shit
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #28
45. You're right . . . it was a great idea . . .
didn't give it enough thought --

!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #5
33. That was tongue-in-cheek.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #33
36. Hey, maybe it's a better idea than I thought ... as I reflect on it ....!!!
There would be more control -- and the weight would increase gradually --

My apologies for my initial comment -- think you might have something there???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tabatha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Rocks don't splinter at 5,000 feet pressure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. That's another excellent point -- !!! And wouldn't be a great problem . . .
if some of them "missed" hitting the target . . . you'd simply have some rocks

on the ocean floor.

Not toxic either -- !!

OK -- I'm moving over to your idea -- more control and makes more sense overall!!

:)

Good thinking!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. I actually suggested one of our nuclear submarines just go sit
on it until they get the relief well dug. I don't think they are capable of diving that deep though. Maybe your idea would work but how you going sink it and get it to land right where you want it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. You'd have to load some crap on it to make it heavier . . . I imagine?
Depends on what control you have over the sub as you bring it down . . . ???

Subs can land on the ocean floor --

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
doc03 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
24. Wikipedia says the Ohio Class Sub can dive over 800 feet
but the actual capability is classified, I doubt it would go a mile deep without being crushed like a soda can though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Yeah -- gave up on subs . . . think we need battle ships ... lots of old ones around???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
7. Submarines would be crushed like empty soda cans....
If they managed to drop them on top of the BOP, they would crush the BOP and make the leak worse.

This reminds me of a joke I heard about a group of scientists who convinced a monkey to put a cork in a elephants ass.

The punchline was mountains and mountains of shit.

This will have no more chance of working than putting an Aircraft Carrier on top of the well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #7
13. Submarines don't get "crushed" when they sit on the ocean floor . . .
We already have the "shit" -- we need to cork it -- !!

And this well ain't no elephant!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 01:13 AM
Response to Reply #13
32. No, it would be crushed long before it reached the floor...n/t
The problem here is that putting a heaving weight won't work. You do not get a good seal, and the oil just spills aorund the bottom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #32
39. Think I understand what you're saying . . . . ??? A little different from
the way I think about subs.

Don't exactly know what you mean by a "heaving weight" . . .

but aren't submarines very big? Would presume the weight and size of a sub

would eclipse this? But, obviously this is just discussion -- opinion on my part.

It's just heartbreaking to think of the lack of plans, the lack of success -- and

worst of all two months before us before this may get capped!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #39
47. This morning on NPR I heard an interview which may enlighten our thinking...
on this subject.

What was revealed in the interview, and this may be in other sources I have not read, is that BP discovered that the architecture beneath the ground may have been compromised in the blow out. An attempt to put a cork in the tube (which is what the submarine would do) would cause drastic leaks from deeper in the well. That oil would flow along fissures and natural faults and come out miles away. This makes sense to me.

You see, what they could do is just cut off the bent and broken riser and put a valve on the top, then close the valve. Oil would stop, in theory. Work better than putting a heavy weight on it.

Except. The Blow Out Preventer (BOP) was damaged and would then leak oil. If the BOP did not fail, the pipe underground has some flaw and the oil would be forced out elsewhere.

Literally, the only thing they can do is drill a relief well. Then, they can seal the original well and put a concrete plug in it. that is why they are trying to put a hat over the well and catch the oil. plugging the well against all the pressure can't be done, according to the man speaking on NPR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robeson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
8. I still like the idea of shooting the Board of Directors of BP into the hole.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #8
22. Saw the CEO tonight on TV . . . very inconvenient for him... wants his life back -- !!!
Edited on Tue Jun-01-10 11:03 PM by defendandprotect
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. My solution is to release a zombie plague upon the world.
The oil will still gush, but at least we will have zombies wandering around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
44. ^^^BEST ANSWER^^^


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ZombieHorde Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. I love that sign! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Urban Prairie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:32 PM
Response to Original message
10. Any idea involving weight and mass,
Will not work on the gusher because of pressure (water depth and gusher force) as well as 1000' of sediment on the Gulf's floor, IMO.

Next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
15. Well, trying to put a box over it, of course, was one of BP's preposterous ideas . . .
subs can get to the ocean floor --

What's your idea for closing it?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #15
41. The box had a whole in it on top that pumped oil up and out.
So it was a lot better than your idea, in that it was actually plausible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
itsrobert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
14. Aquaman
?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AsahinaKimi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
20. Really?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. I suggested ACME yesterday
I figure Wile E. Coyote might be able to come up with a plan... He couldn't do any worse than BP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
recoveringdittohed Donating Member (463 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:19 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. This looks like a job for Rube Goldberg
Some of the techniques BP has been using sound a little like Rube Goldberg inventions.

http://www.rubegoldberg.com/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
walldude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:39 PM
Response to Reply #25
31. LOL.. Ole Rube has entered my mind a number of times since this fiasco
started. At this point I'm just trying to laugh because the reality is too depressing..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mendocino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
17. How about a pipe with a rubber bladder
on the end of it. Stick into broken pipe, pump bladder full with a liquid, plugs leak, sort of like an angioplasty. Might work better than my earlier idea, Operation Jump Shot, where the pipe is plugged with basketballs.;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
L0oniX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:58 PM
Response to Original message
18. How about we jam that mutha fuckin BP CEO down the pipe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:02 PM
Response to Original message
21. Revised preposterous suggestion: Sink a battle ship over it---?????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. just a thought, but wouldn't the oil and gas just travel around any ship you care to junk there?
It's not a divet that needs filling, it's a deep well that has thousands of pounds of pressure per square inch launched substance pouring forth.

Maybe we could just drop some peanut butter in there? Would make a better seal than a battleship shaped object.

Or, wax and some crazy glue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #30
35. I think the weight of a battle ship might do it . . . . ??!!!
Edited on Wed Jun-02-10 12:49 PM by defendandprotect
Nor is a battle ship "peanut butter" nor "crazy glue" ---

We need to sit something down on this thing -- while they are thinking of other

ways to cap it!

The thought of getting thru all of June and July before this is capped sometime in

August is just heartbreaking ....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
23. I think we should get an enormous, automatic
mechanical finger. After we use our ginormous automatic finger to plug the leak, I'll be taking suggestions for where else we might want to put it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. Apropos solution -- !!
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
29. I still say
Shoot the goddamn thing full of tampons. After seeing what just one tampon does when it gets flushed down the toilet, I'd bet shooting a container load of them in there would stop the thing up.

There's my preposterous suggestion :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
donco6 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
34. BOMBS BOMBS! That's the ticket!


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #34
38. Nice post, McCain!!
Bomb, bomb, bomb... bomb BP!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
40. Stuff it full of all the fake moon landing footage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
43. Think we have a winner . . . HERE . . .
Edited on Wed Jun-02-10 12:57 PM by defendandprotect
This is tabatha's idea and the more I reflect on it, the better I like it!!

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=8466805&mesg_id=8466861
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:16 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC