Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ABC's Stephanopoulos Reports Erroneously on Rightwing Criminal O'Keefe's Latest Video Scam

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 08:41 PM
Original message
ABC's Stephanopoulos Reports Erroneously on Rightwing Criminal O'Keefe's Latest Video Scam


ABC's Stephanopoulos Reports Erroneously on Rightwing Criminal O'Keefe's Latest Video Scam
'Good Morning America' host repeats, nearly verbatim, NYTimes' inaccurate, discredited report in 'exclusive' interview today...

As convicted federal criminal and rightwing dirty-trickster James O'Keefe repeated over and again this morning on ABC's Good Morning America, "this isn't about me." (Full video at end of article.)

To that end, neither is The BRAD BLOG's coverage of the scam artists' phony ACORN videos, or his attempted wiretap plot in a U.S. Senator's office, or his latest startling exposé for which he's released video today (also posted at end of article) purporting to show that he was allowed a full hour for his lunch break during one of two training days as a U.S. Census worker in April, and even allowed to leave an hour or two early when that day's training completed ahead of schedule. (Shocking, I know!)

Our coverage isn't about him. Never has been. We expect partisan scam artists like him, and his employer, rightwing con-man Andrew Breitbart, to get away with whatever deceptive, partisan nonsense they can. This has always been about the utter failure of the corporate mainstream media in irresponsibly giving them a platform to publicize their propaganda, without even bothering to check any of the facts for accuracy first.

This morning, George Stephanopoulos did exactly that in the introduction to his "exclusive" interview with O'Keefe and Breitbart (who was on hand to enjoy some of O'Keefe's spotlight as well, for some reason) by repeating an inaccurate report from the New York Times nearly verbatim, despite the "paper of record" having corrected at least part of it over two months ago, and despite their Public Editor (ombudsman) having been broadly ridiculed for an embarrassing attempt to defend it...

FULL STORY: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=7870
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Bolo Boffin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 08:45 PM
Response to Original message
1. This knucklehead had worked for the Census before.
That's right. The training he was completing so quickly? Most of it (if not all of it) he'd already been through before.

Scam, baby, scam.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 08:46 PM
Response to Original message
2. "Erroneously" my shiny metal ASS! "Blatantly disingenuious" would be more truthful, and too kind.
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 09:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. Duh, want me to lob the softballs now, boss?
Shit yeah, let the turds fly, Georgie...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jotsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
4. I knew it wouldn't be long.
From my journal, in response to the recent sentencing, or lack of it, I should say.


After his original fifteen minutes of infamous familiarity was exposed way late in the game, (too late, as it turns out for ACORN) thanks to an accommodating media that gave the story credibility where none was warranted and without ever independently checking facts alluded to. For me as a DUer, the whole situation leaves me conflicted. The BradBlog has membership standing here, and has for more than five years. Mr Friedman called out one publication in particular and engaged in pretty public dialog which I don't believe said publication has ever acknowledged 'significant' inappropriate coverage of the matter. I had hoped to see other members of this community be less of a conduit for the venue in support of one of their own, and something of a marquis/high profile member to boot, but it is not to be. People here post from it all day every day and I shy from participation once I see it as the source or the meat of a post. Most, if not all stories are available from other sites, so I don't see the harm in going the extra step but also have no right to ask others to express their support for Mr. Friedman in the manner I have adopted.



As for what might be next this back door boondoggler

This pimply pup has a willful disregard for the very concept of genuine, as he's well taken to his training as leader of the not so Breitbot brats. I'd venture a guess that he and whatever ilk are willing to associate with him are up to some other political stingy escapade which will end in folly.

And lastly, if the application and enforcement of the rule of law doesn't tip back to level soon, anybody will think they can do anything and things could get might ugly from there. We're supposed to be smarter than this, not that I'm claiming any expertise in that regard.

Sorry Mr. Friedman, for me as a DUer, this is a lot about you. Mostly cuz I think you rock, but that's a talk we've already had.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jotsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 12:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. I've watched the video. UGGITY
They got problems, I'm seeeeeeeeeeeeeething. Who funds these sorry excuses for...can't insult pigs that way.

I've checked Open Secrets, Sourcewatch, Pro Publica, and Wikileaks. Where do I find who funds these ring kissing rim nods?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BradBlog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. You are exceptionally kind, Jotsy...

Thank you for your strong support, kind words, and responsibility in giving a damn enough to take action. No matter who else may (or may not) do same...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alp227 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
5. Despite working at the Clinton White House, this ain't no liberal credential.
Conservatives hate GS because he used to work for the (Trousers-down) Clinton White House. Thus, at every opportunity they accuse GS of liberal bias in his reporting. Well this time is a big suckup to Fox News. The chyron might've suggested so, but GS chose the former (journalist) not latter (cross the line) as answer. Typical corporate drone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aslanspal Donating Member (303 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 11:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. GS is a dumb ass....
weeny...and his comic wife is not fucking funny at all..and what is wrong with her puffed out eyes ..she looks 50 years old.

oh, back to George...he is not doing his homework not doing his job he is just cruising.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bos1 Donating Member (997 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 02:10 AM
Response to Original message
8. Brad needs an editor or some writing lessons.
Reading through his hyperventilating is hard
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Wizard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 04:34 AM
Response to Original message
9. Stephanopoulos Reports Erroneously
George is a propagandist. Reporting the news is not part of his job description.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spheric Donating Member (512 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 08:21 AM
Response to Original message
10. K&R /nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
11. Stephanopolous has very likely been under threat of exposure for many years now...
he created an image to market himself for big dollars and now he's stuck playing their games and delivering their storylines. I understand, but...FUCK HIM!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 10:39 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. Agreed, blm. He is nothing more than a handsomely-paid shill. What do you mean by
" . . . has very likely been under threat of exposure for many years now . . ."?

Thanks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-03-10 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. sadly....it's another closet story....
which pisses me off, since he's supposed to have come from a more 'enlightened' place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
droidamus2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
12. Uh, excuse me
When you take the US Census training you turn in a time sheet that says when you arrived (actually when you left your home), when you left for lunch, when you returned from lunch, when you left (actually estimated time to arrive back home). Therefore what the hell is the problem you are only getting paid for the time you are in training, not your time at lunch or the time you were not training. There is a certain amount of training to complete everyday. I don't know if the instructor is allowed to go on or not but if you got done early so be it. Whatever video this idiot came up with shows nothing but typical training.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olegramps Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-02-10 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Perhaps he should be charged with scamming the government with false time sheets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 04:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC