|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 06:57 PM Original message |
“They have my full support to follow the facts wherever they lead, without fear or favor,” |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:02 PM Response to Original message |
1. and then?..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:06 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. from the article |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:20 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. which is not the same thing as holding BP accountable for this spill, right? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:27 PM Response to Reply #3 |
6. That's correct, Eric Holder and the Justice department is handling that aspect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrispyQ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:31 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. It was held in the Rose Garden to cover the stench of an empty assurance. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:33 PM Response to Reply #8 |
10. Your claim that a task shouldn't be tried because it's too difficult |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CrispyQ (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 08:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
31. I don't disagree that it's a worthy goal, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 08:05 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. You openly mocked the goal and those that thought it's a good one |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Why do you care? Obama is a great big failure to you no matter what he does, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:22 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. not true. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:28 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Like the 113 promises kept? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:31 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. broken record |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:34 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. No, it's not broken, it is his actual record....and it is 17 months old. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:36 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I don't think you understand the term "broken record" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:42 PM Response to Reply #13 |
20. Are you referring to your never ending attacks on our President? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:43 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. er... nope. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:44 PM Response to Reply #21 |
22. OK, just checking |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:45 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. no problem |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:36 PM Response to Reply #11 |
14. and the record is getting bigger and bigger with another 253 promises in the works |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:38 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. you guys are a trip, really, idiomatic phrases, and irony, is lost on you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:35 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. "the issues that mean the most to me." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:37 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. you think I"m against torture, war and pro gay rights for personal reasons? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:40 PM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Obama shares those same views and has already banned torture |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lerkfish (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:44 PM Response to Reply #18 |
23. er ... not exactly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:45 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Yet the ever dwindling numbers of troops in Iraq would contradict that claim |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:40 PM Response to Original message |
17. Just like the 9/11 commission no doubt.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:41 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Bob Grahm is no Tom Kean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:50 PM Response to Reply #19 |
26. Some lower level people will get blamed.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:51 PM Response to Reply #26 |
27. Remember this panel is about prevention. Eric Holder and the Justice Department |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fumesucker (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 11:48 PM Response to Reply #27 |
38. And my prediction remains the same in any case.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
28. More nice sounding words- to go with a result that will, based on previous commissions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:55 PM Response to Reply #28 |
29. The difference is that previous commissions were created by George Bush |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 07:58 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Commissions didn't just start with Bush... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 08:01 PM Response to Original message |
32. no subpoena power; and Reilly was chosen by poppy Bush for Exxon Valdez; only platitudes resulted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 08:03 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. Eric Holder and the Justice Department will be handling the subpoenas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 08:07 PM Response to Reply #33 |
35. then it's certainly not an independent committee, in any sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NJmaverick (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 08:08 PM Response to Reply #35 |
36. Yes the panel is independent and is tasks with preventing this from happening again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
amborin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Jun-01-10 08:13 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. nope; it's certainly not independent when it has to go through the fed gov't to subpoena anything; |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 11:45 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC