Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Wonders of the American Way of War

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
davidswanson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 11:34 PM
Original message
The Wonders of the American Way of War
If a person could approach you on the street, gently caress your cheek, and walk away leaving you with the feeling of having been violently slapped and dowsed with a bucket of ice water, they would approximate Tom Engelhardt's writing, including that in his newest book "The American Way of War: How Bush's Wars Became Obama's."

Let me stipulate from the start that at least three-quarters of the book has nothing to do with Obama, but deals purely with Bush's wars. However, those wars -- which always were and still are our wars and our Congress's wars, and the wars of our grandchildren who will pay for them financially and probably in more serious ways -- have not been fundamentally changed by applying the name of a different emperor to them. What Engelhardt has written over the past several years and collected here on the subject of war needed to be said and will continued to need to be said more loudly with each passing day.

By "wonders of war" I don't mean the latest technological feats, drone warrior desk jobs, or space weapons -- all things Engelhardt does cover. I mean, rather, the quiet pausing to marvel in silence, or to ponder along with Engelhardt, the perverse and unnatural wonder that is our war-based society and our war-based economy, beginning perhaps with the wonder that we live in these things unknowingly.

Engelhardt's writing puts into historical context, and into the context of possible alternatives some of our more bizarre/mundane phenomena, including, among much else:

--The crimes of 9-11, how our culture was prepared for such a thing, how differently we might have taken it had the buildings not fallen, and how readily and outrageously we transformed a crime into a war. Engelhardt reminds us of a White House press conference at which a reporter asked President Bush whether he really was considering declaring war on an individual. (The concern for this reporter, of course, was not with presidents declaring wars, but with the nature of the proposed enemy.)

--The insanity of the response to 9-11 that has been building for almost nine years in what we never before would have tolerated anyone calling "the homeland."

--The empire of military bases the United States has spread around the globe, which occupy (pun intended) such a central position in the motivations of everything our government does and in the understanding that most of humanity has of us, but of which we are almost entirely unaware.

--The empire of 17 competing and catastrophically bad "intelligence" agencies in the U.S. government. If we can't pause and wonder at this world of public but unaccountable crime, we are probably beyond the point of recovery.

--The nature of aerial bombing, the horrific murdering and torturing done by the bombs, and the sick spell that has convinced people that dropping bombs is moral and right, while retail scale killing and torturing is barbarous and evil.

--The exaggerated attention paid to certain dangers, like terrorism, as compared to much greater dangers, like illnesses and preventable accidents. If you wonder about this one too much you may begin to suspect that the libertarian denunciation of government may only ever be strong enough to defund workplace safety, environmental protection, and healthcare, whereas the funding of wars rises or falls based on acceptance or rejection of much more grandiose myths of good-and-evil created specifically to counter our usual distaste for unnecessary deaths.

Engelhardt draws out what is new, and what is identical to the claims and myths produced during previous wars and empires. And he goes after the degradation of our language. "Terrorism" has been reshaped to mean anti-U.S. activity. (Which explains why the media compares peace activists attacked by the Israeli military to al Qaeda.) Well known and openly discussed wars like our current war in Pakistan are consistently labeled "covert." The explanation for this may be that presidents think the label "covert" makes their undeclared wars less unconstitutional. But why, exactly, should a secret war -- if it really were secret -- be less, rather than more, an abuse of power?

Tom Engelhardt occasionally publishes my articles on his website, TomDispatch, and less than a year into the reign of Obama, he was good enough to publish an article of mine with the headline "Bush's Third Term? You're Living It." But, reading "The American Way of War: How Bush's Wars Became Obama's" leaves you perplexed, most of the way through, about the subtitle. Engelhardt writes as if something has fundamentally changed for the better, or may have, or might if we hope it:

"Whatever the Obama administration may want to do, or think should be done, if we don't face the record we created, if we only look forward, if we only round up the usual suspects, if we try to turn that page in history and put a paperweight atop it, we will be haunted by the Bush years until hell freezes over."


True enough, but at this point the Obama years are likely to do the most severe haunting if they do not produce hell right here on earth.

Chapter 6 of this seven-chapter book is called "Obama's War" but still says very little about Obama, although including plenty of criticism for Bush, the media, the Pentagon, and others. Chapter 7, however, begins to fulfill the promise of the book's subtitle. Here we read a truly brilliant speech that Engelhardt tells us Obama should give but never will. Although why an ideal speech would include this line is beyond me:

"As president, I retain the right to strike at Al-Qaeda or other terrorists who mean us imminent harm, no matter where they may be."


No nation has that right. No world will long survive in which nations claim that right. And our republic will not long survive ascribing that right to presidents. These are all points that I take Engelhardt to more or less agree with in other passages. He goes on, in the closing pages of the book, to accurately describe the criminal policies of the current White House. Our recovery from these policies will depend on writers like Engelhardt prodding us to pay attention through each coming step and stumble down the oil-slicked slide to fascism.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. No world will long survive in which nations claim that right.
Damn straight.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. We are messed up
The death, murder and mayhem budget of the DoD is all the proof one needs.

We can blow the world back to the stone ages 100 times over and do it in 10 minutes from now. This is no way to live. This one blue planet of life amongst the nothingness of space and we spend our time and money on being able to blow it all to shit? We are messed up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 03:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
10. That's what people just can't seem to internalize, this is it.
All that anybody has ever had said or done, and all that they will ever have, say or do, is for nothing if we kill this one fragile slime-ball. Instead we pretend that we know what is going on, we feign understanding. and we ignore what is right in front of us, all to maintain an illusion of importance.

Stupid bald monkeys.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demeter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
3. The Obama Administration Is as Fact-Free as the Preceding Gang
and we are drowning in ignorance of facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solly Mack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 07:56 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R!
"...and how readily and outrageously we transformed a crime into a war"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 07:59 AM
Response to Original message
5. A country made by war
A Country Made by War is a great primer on the larger topic of the impact of US military power on our country. The military becomes a defining feature of the country, virtually from before the country was formed. Washington is our first president almost entirely because of his role as commanding general. He wears a military uniform for most appearances. He raises an army to enforce the Whiskey Tax. Jefferson starts the West Point Academy because he wants a "national" college. He sends Lewis and Clark on an expedition under the auspices of the Army. Westward expansion is done almost entirely at the point of a gun, with military "bases" being the primary focus of commerce. The 20th century is ushered in with our military being the primary method of our foreign policy.

The question really isn't how we "got to be this way". The reality is "we've always been this way". The question really is, "can we be another way?".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:08 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Excellent points, zipplewraith. The answer to the last question is "No".
The Military-Industrial-Corporate Complex has us by the throat and will not let go. Period. We are choking to death in their grip--along with most of the globe.

But I'm really glad that they're installing solar panels on all the barracks at Fort Bragg. Now that the military is going Green, and everything.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zipplewrath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. The MIC is us
The MIC is "us" and in essence always has been. That's the larger point. It employs us, it provides GI benefits, VA healthcare, it educates us, it drives our cultural development, it advances our foreign policy, it provides for us during times of great crisis, and it defends us when we are under attack. We can't get rid of it because it is what we've always been.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pundaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. No it is not us, it most definitely is "them." I vote against it every chance, I decry it when it
supported, I vote against people who vote to fund war. The representative from my district voted for war repeatedly, so I signed the petition for his opponent, and if there is only one opponent available I will vote for him over a Democrat who in 20 years has never once returned as much Federal money to his district as taxes removed, who approved all the financial deregulation, who would not hold public healthcare hearings, an whose 12 million campaign chest was filled with 10 million from banks and insurers.

While I am voting against a guy with a D after his name, he is no Democrat. Check the specifics of your representatives, do they represent the Party, or are they just using you, as the guy in MA 2 is using his constituents?

The enemy is Us line is only true if you ratify the behavior of your elected officials by voting for them after you have actual performance to go on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-04-10 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Lynch (D-MA-09) is another warmonger.
We've been trying to get him out for the last three election cycles.

Unfortunately warmongers have big campaign funds from the corporations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bertman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
6. Recommend. Thanks for the headsup on this book, David.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Echo In Light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-01-10 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
9. Diseased, brainwashed empire
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 02:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC