Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oath Keepers want sheriffs back as top cop

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
The Straight Story Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 12:50 PM
Original message
Oath Keepers want sheriffs back as top cop

Oath Keepers want sheriffs back as top cop


By MATT GOURAS, Associated Press Writer Matt Gouras, Associated Press Writer – Mon May 31, 5:50 am ET

HELENA, Mont. – For Rex Nichols, the right person to guard against unrestrained federal power encroaching on the rural northwestern Montana county he calls home is a figure straight out of the old West — the aggressive, no-nonsense sheriff.

The retired police officer and investment adviser intends to make that a reality, joining at least a dozen candidates in other states running for office on an intepretation of the Constitution they say means the sheriff is the highest law enforcer in the land, even above federal agents.

"Frankly if he wants to, the sheriff can probably do more for the Constitution and protecting the people than anyone else," Nichols said.

The candidates are part of a loosely organized nationwide movement called the Oath Keepers, which is enlisting law enforcement and military personnel to vow to refuse 10 orders they say are unconstitutional, from confiscating guns to warrantless searches.

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100531/ap_on_re_us/us_oath_keepers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe Andy Taylor is available...
Oh wait, he never carried a gun.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinboy3niner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Barney Fife has a gun...
and a bullet in his pocket! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:04 PM
Response to Original message
2. The OAF Keepers is more accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yella_dawg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Matt Dillon can handle anything.
Where's Chester when you need him?



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-31-10 01:20 PM
Response to Original message
5. Sheriffs are usually elected directly by voters while other chief law enforcement officers are
appointed by politicians.

They are always the highest law enforcement officer of a county and commander of militia in that county.

By federal law, the militia includes all males 17-45 and in some states the militia includes all residents from 17-64.

State laws define when and how the militia can be used and the pertinent part is the "unorganized militia". The organized militia includes people on active or serving in guard units.

Sheriffs are indeed extremely powerful although one can argue about the extent of their power.

In a crisis where government breaks down, a sheriff could easily be the supreme law in a county until a functioning government is reestablished.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC