Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

WHY did the D.C. Madam scandal die?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 09:29 AM
Original message
WHY did the D.C. Madam scandal die?
Usually, these types of scandals are front page news, some red meat for the people out there, something to blame on us degenerate San Francisco-Hollywood Liberals, and of course something to make the righties scream "BILL CLINTON!!!!" but not this time.

I might be playing the role of Captain Obvious here, but I think it's dead because Republicans, maybe even a couple of Bush Administration members, well known Conservative activists, and Neo-Cons are on the list that makes up a huge portion of this scandal.

Is there any other reason a sex scandal of this magnitude would actually go down the memory hole?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. I wondered if something like this would happen if "The List" were given to ABC...
One of Bush's biggest cheerleaders.

When I read that ABC had taken possession of "The List", I thought "OK, well, we won't be seeing anything about that again..."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. it seems like they are sweeping another scandal under the rug.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
3. Because Republicans own the media.
ALL the Republican scandals die. How many has it been now?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liam_laddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. Another news item that disappeared...
how about that report last week that a "senior US Army commander," or officer, was wounded during a daylight inspection of the wall(s) being erected around a Sunni neighborhood in east Baghdad. Never saw a name or follow-up. Hmmmm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
5. Perhaps ABC found too many Washington Press Corp phone numbers
on her list? The repubs aren't the only ones good at covering their asses. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
6. Because Paris Hilton went to jail?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Turbineguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Paris paid for their sins.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. Don't worry, they are investigating the Clinton years right now... announcement soon!
When I heard Brian Ross on CSPAN say that other news organizations had been given tel numbers during the Clinton years I heard a bell go off.

ABC says now nothing newsworthy here over last six years, nobody I recognized as important --after all the breathless promotion of top officials to be outed.

It will arise as soon as they can nail down the Clinton Admin 'clients.'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 09:47 AM
Response to Original message
9. Too many people from the media were caught up in it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. I imagine because Johns in high positions tend to be unsavoury characters -
to put it mildly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raskolnik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-08-07 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
11. I for one am very, very glad its dying.
I have no desire to waste public attention playing 'gotcha' with some lower-echelon administration official.

Of all the things for which to criticize this administration, an undersecretary getting a handjob once a week doesn't rate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC