The Freeper thread:
The fake feminism of Sarah Palin (***BARF ALERT***)
Washington comPost ^ | 5/29/2010 | Jessica Valenti
Posted on Saturday, May 29, 2010 6:03:11 AM by markomalley
Sarah Palin sure is dropping the f-bomb a lot lately.
In a widely noted speech this month to the Susan B. Anthony List, an anti-abortion-rights group, Palin invoked the words "feminism" and "feminist" no less than a dozen times. She called for a "pro-woman sisterhood" and addressed the "sisters" in the audience. If it weren't for the regular references to gun rights, you might have thought you were listening to Gloria Steinem.
If this rhetoric seems uncharacteristic of the former governor of Alaska, that's because it is. When running for vice president in 2008, Palin flip-flopped on the feminist question, telling CBS's Katie Couric that she is one, but later telling NBC's Brian Williams, "I'm not going to label myself anything."
Today, however, Palin is happily adopting the feminist label. She's throwing support behind "mama grizzly" candidates, describing the large number of women in the "tea party" as evidence of a "mom awakening" and preaching girl power on her Facebook page.
It's not a realization of the importance of women's rights that's inspired the change. It's strategy. Palin's sisterly speechifying is part of a larger conservative move to woo women by appropriating feminist language. Just as consumer culture tries to sell "Girls Gone Wild"-style sexism as "empowerment," conservatives are trying to sell anti-women policies shrouded in pro-women rhetoric.
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
The freeper responses:
Liberals are so predictable. Black conservatives aren't black enough. Female conservatives aren't female enough.
I wonder if they just don't realize how transparent they've become or if they just don't care one way or the other.
1 posted on Saturday, May 29, 2010 6:03:11 AM by markomalley
***
To: markomalley
If it weren't for the regular references to gun rights, you might have thought you were listening to Gloria Steinem.
Really? You mean Sarah was saying that it was okay for Bill Clinton to grab Kathleen Willey's breasts and force her hand on his privates because he stopped when Willey said no?
9 posted on Saturday, May 29, 2010 6:16:55 AM by Dahoser (Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
***
To: markomalley
Ivy League womyn have had their brains starched out by feminist studies.
11 posted on Saturday, May 29, 2010 6:24:52 AM by AU72
***
To: All
I love it when Palin drives them bonkers.
I’ve noticed a huge uptick in attacks from my liberal friends.
They are scared sitless.
17 posted on Saturday, May 29, 2010 6:38:21 AM by rbmillerjr (A loud band of PaulBots, Isolationists, Protectionists, 911Inside Jobnuts, 3rdParty Loud Irrelevants)
***
To: markomalley
Her feminism is fake only under the definition of the carpet munching, Birkenstock wearing NAGS.
25 posted on Saturday, May 29, 2010 7:31:47 AM by Mike Darancette (Flip Both Houses)