Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BP worker takes 5th, making prosecution a possibility

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 05:49 AM
Original message
BP worker takes 5th, making prosecution a possibility


BP worker takes 5th, making prosecution a possibility

By Erika Bolstad, Joseph Goodman and Marisa Taylor | McClatchy Newspapers


WASHINGTON — A top BP worker who was aboard the Deepwater Horizon in the hours leading up to the explosion declined to testify in front of a federal panel investigating the deadly oil rig blowout, telling the U.S Coast Guard he was invoking his constitutional right to avoid self-incrimination.

The move Wednesday by BP's Robert Kaluza raises the possibility of criminal liability in the April 20 explosion that killed 11 and five weeks later continues to spew hundreds of thousands of gallons of oil into the Gulf of Mexico each day.

Wednesday's government hearing in Louisiana, however, failed to determine why — despite unusual pressure and fluid readings on the rig — a BP official decided on the day of the explosion to proceed with removing heavy drilling fluid from the well and replacing it with lighter-weight seawater that was unable to prevent gas from surging to the surface and exploding.

Employees and experts testified that in the hours before the explosion, they witnessed a power struggle over that decision — the kind of argument common among the different parties that lease and run complicated offshore drilling operations, but one that this time, had deadly consequences.

One employee who worked for the rig owner, Transocean, was so mad after the fight that he warned they'd be relying on the rig's blowout preventer if they proceeded the way BP wanted.

more...

http://www.mcclatchydc.com/2010/05/26/94884/bp-could-be-held-criminally-liable.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 05:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. Is Kaluza a common name for an environmental terrorist?
Just wondering what Homeland Securities no-drilling list will look like...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Transocean is not off the hook either
One employee who worked for the rig owner, Transocean, was so mad after the fight that he warned they'd be relying on the rig's blowout preventer if they proceeded the way BP wanted

This indicates to me they suspected the annular seal at the bottom was bad, yet they sent the test crew (Schlumberger) away. They already suspected the BOP was damaged.

Did the 'Company Man' have all of this information? Many reasons that they would keep the damage to the BOP from the 'Company Man' if one of their employees damaged it, or they did not maintain it properly.

Lot of parties responsible as far as I can tell.

All of this indicates to me that Transocean/BP strongly suspected the seal was no good. And as noted on the Oil Drum, if they got lucky and got things sealed, the production rig reopening the well would have been doomed. I think they were trying to seal a bad well as quickly/cheaply as possible, then walk away.

Bottom line, offshore drilling moratorium. It is clear to me now that the ENTIRE industry is incompetent. The technology is inadequate. The 'command and control' is inadequate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I thought Schlumberger left post-haste of their own accord after
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. This was debunked (to my satisfaction) at the Oil Drum
Edited on Thu May-27-10 07:09 AM by Strelnikov_
I think they sent the test crew away because they suspected what the test result would be. A faulty seal. But now it would be documented (meaning criminally negligent if something went wrong).

Again, I think they were trying to close a bad well as quickly/cheaply as possible.

Whole operation was pretty damned far from 'fail safe'. And my bet, it is industry wide. They have just been lucky up to now.

Shut it down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:12 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thanks. I'm not that familiar with any of this, so bow to your
conclusions. I also agree there's more than likely criminal negligence involved.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 06:47 AM
Response to Original message
4. If some stupid slob lit a cigarette near a gas pump causing an explosion
and a death, he'd be in jail on negligent homicide charges. Since corporations are now people, they should also be facing negligent homicide charges. Those 11 men didn't have to die.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
5. He'll Plea Out...
We'll see more of this as BP laywers up to the gills in the face of growing calls and investigations into criminal negligence. I see some of these smaller fish getting squeezed now and then squeezed up later to serve up the higher ups in the command who gave them the orders they passed down the line. It's just a matter of time when one talks and other will look to strike deals to serve up others.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-27-10 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. I suppose you're right; money talks, and BP has
boatloads (no puns intended).

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC