Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Wasilla Wolf Killa accuses Rachel Maddow of conducting a "prejudiced" interview with Rand Paul

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 10:45 AM
Original message
The Wasilla Wolf Killa accuses Rachel Maddow of conducting a "prejudiced" interview with Rand Paul
from huffpost:



Former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin accused MSNBC's Rachel Maddow on Sunday of conducting a "prejudiced" interview with Rand Paul, in which the Tea Party candidate infamously aired skepticism about the reach of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.

Speaking to "Fox News Sunday," the 2008 Republican vice-presidential nominee said that Paul was being subjected to the same biased media coverage that marked her run for office, before offering her Tea Party-backed candidate a bit of advice.

"One thing we can learn in this lesson that I have learned and Rand Paul is learning now is don't assume that you can engage in a hypothetical discussion about constitutional impacts with a reporter or a media personality who has an agenda, who may be prejudiced before they even get into the interview in regards to what your answer may be," Palin said. "You know, they are looking for the gotcha moment. And that evidently appears to be what they did with Rand Paul, and I'm thankful he clarified his answer about his support for the Civil Rights Act."

Paul sparked several days worth of controversial coverage when he suggested to Maddow that the government had meddled too far into private enterprise in the passage of the Civil Rights Act and other legislation. But contrary to Palin's suggestion, it wasn't an adversarial interview that was the root of the problem. After all, Paul was granted 15 minutes by Maddow to explain his position on the matter. Moreover, he had made the same controversial comments earlier that morning to NPR (which, in turn, served as the basis of Maddow's questioning). .........(more)

The complete piece is at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/23/palin-on-maddow-rand-paul_n_586353.html



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
lunatica Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. Reporting and doing interviews based on facts is now an agenda
Who knew?

Sarah just hates it when someone brings up shit she says as part of an interview. That's just so unfair and gotcha stuff! Poor Rand! The unfairness of being asked to explain what he said!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Maybe the half-term halfwit should go on the Maddow program to
present her case.

I'd tune in in for that.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fleshdancer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. oh yes! It's almost as bad as that evil Katie Couric asking "what do you read?"
I mean, how DARE Maddow ask anything other than "so what exactly makes you so awesome?" or "as a patriot, what's the worst thing about the US government?". She's soooo mean.

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:07 AM
Response to Original message
4. I know what I'll be watching on Monday night
:evilgrin:

Rachel will tear her apart with a smile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
5. This Lady Is An Idiot...
Any word from Mooselini on Drill Baby Drill yet? Gonna be fun to watch all the candidates she's glammed onto and visa versa go down in November.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
6. Nothing hypothetical about people's rights
Fuck you Lady Blah Blah :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HopeHoops Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah, teabaggers should stick with "Fair and Balanced" FOX.
:rofl:

What a fucking idiot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BootinUp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. Suspension of disbelief is obviously a prerequisite
for teabaggers. Ignore what he said before, (many times) he supports the Civil Rights Act! Really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hansel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
9. Of course she would be against Rachel's interviewing style, because..
Edited on Sun May-23-10 12:00 PM by Hansel
It's far more responsible to fabricate controversy and air prejudiced segments using doctored tapes and inflammatory and slanderous commentary and repeat it over and over and over on every show without giving the target a chance to respond or defend him or herself (or if you do, cut their mic or scream over them and call them liars). Like she and her employer does it.

Rachel did it all wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
10. Don't know how,
Edited on Sun May-23-10 12:01 PM by WeDidIt
but this posted in a different thread than I was actually posting in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
11. But...she wants to run for Obamas Job....Moose Lady is nutz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Contrary1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
12. If Rand learned nothing from Palin's stupidity...
Does that make him more stupid, or just equally as stupid as The Quitter?

I would hate to see Sarah dethroned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-23-10 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
13. Sarah,
just shut the fuck up! I am so sick and tired of this person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 02:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC