Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Blitzer's list of recent Washington sex scandals included only Democrats

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 08:51 AM
Original message
Blitzer's list of recent Washington sex scandals included only Democrats
http://mediamatters.org/items/200705050002?f=h_latest

On the May 3 edition of CNN's The Situation Room, host Wolf Blitzer observed that Washington is "no stranger to sex scandals," then provided viewers with examples of scandals involving only Democrats. During the segment, Blitzer was discussing the "DC Madam" scandal that has already led to the resignation of Deputy Secretary of State Randall L. Tobias, the first director of U.S. Foreign Assistance and administrator of the U.S. Agency for International Development.

Blitzer listed three sex scandals: former President Bill Clinton's affair with Monica Lewinsky (1998), former Sen. Gary Hart's (D-CO) liaison with Donna Rice (1987), and former House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Wilbur Mills' (D-AR) involvement with Fanne Foxe (1974). But there have also been numerous -- and more recent -- sex scandals involving Republicans. For example:

On September 29, 2006, then-Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL) resigned after ABC News asked him about sexually explicit instant messages to underage former congressional pages. The messages, according to ABC News, were "provided by former male pages who said the congressman, under the AOL Instant Messenger screen name Maf54, made repeated references to sexual organs and acts." The House Ethics Committee later decided not to take any disciplinary action against members of the House leadership who had known of emails sent by Foley to former pages, as these were found to be not quite as explicit as the instant messages. One former page, however, described those emails as "sick sick sick sick sick."

In 1999, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich's (R-GA) "long-term" affair with congressional aide Callista Bisek -- whom he later married -- was revealed while he was seeking a divorce from his second wife. In March 2007, Gingrich confessed to the affair.
In December 1998, during impeachment proceedings against Clinton stemming from the Lewinsky affair, then-House Speaker-designate Bob Livingston (R-LA) admitted to having an extramarital affair. Two days later, Livingston announced he would not seek the speakership and that he would resign from the House in mid-1999. He resigned in March 1999.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. Since Blitzer himself isn't having sex
he's just jealous.

Once in a while Cafferty will refer to Mrs. Blitzer and Wolfie just dismisses her with a sarcastic aside.

Nothing to watch there...move along, folks.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hobbit709 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 08:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. The fix is in
If the media doesn't discuss it, it doesn't exist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. Or...if the media does discuss it...
it isn't worth discussing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 09:06 AM
Response to Original message
3. Let's Not Forget
Bob Packwood or Buzz Lukens. Real gentlemen :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 09:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. And the Gannon/Guckert overnight WH visits are still unexplained
THAT will be a scandal when the real story comes out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Actually, they're not unexplained.
We know what was going on.

There is no such thing as a smoking gun with this Administration. If you video of it, they'd deny it, so why wait for 'proof'? Just convict them on principle.

Reminds me of the old Western Spoof: Sure, we'll give ya a fair trial and THEN we'll hang ya!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crikkett Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
9. And then we'll be treated to endless loops of the Prez. kissing his boy on the head in public
just like that hug between Monica and Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. he's just doing what he always does -- propping up the gop.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 09:49 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. what is with that signature line website ?
Written by Chris Miller, late of National Lampoon?

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. i know, huh?
did you get to the part about three ways?

i don't know if it's serious or not -- but it cracks me up -- more so if it's serious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnaries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 05:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Hilarious! I just bookmarked it!
I can't wait to send it to some friends....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PCIntern Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #11
16. OUTSTANDING, PRIVATE PYLE!!!
You've outdone yourself...I'm always up for new Biblical interpretations. I have to run this past some priests I treat. A few rabbis too...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
xchrom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. just doing my part, sir!
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
10. Blitzer is a propagandist paid for by the war profiteers who run things in the US
so what's new?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gollygee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
13. He went back to 1974 to find sex scandals?
As if there weren't any that were more relevant to his audience, a good portion of whom weren't even born yet at that point? But of course he had to make sure to avoid the obvious VERY RECENT sex scandals, which were Republican sex scandals. He should be reprimanded by CNN - it is not only biased; it's lousy reporting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 05:27 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Leslie is a paid for Rethug Whore posing as a Journalist.
Is that news to anyone?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmondine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-07-07 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. I agree
The repugs have characterized the Dems as the wild, swinging, free-for-all party, and yet Blitz Boy has to go back 33 years just to compile a list of three.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
15. Leslie is touting Democrats' virility? Oops!
Edited on Sun May-06-07 05:35 PM by sfexpat2000
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. That's why Blitzer gets the big bucks. He's subtle.
Edited on Sun May-06-07 06:09 PM by Marr
In terms of US propaganda, at least- that's vrey subtle. Clearly pro-GOP bias, but it slips right by the vast majority of viewers.

It may well come naturally to him, as I suspect he gets his own news from fairly right-wing sources. He's probably reading off a little mental list in his head that was originally compiled by someone at the Heritage Foundation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
progressoid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun May-06-07 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
18. Can't say I miss CNN since I cancelled cable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-07-07 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
21. he went all the way back to 1974? LOL What about Jeff Gannon?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC