Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Admin sheltered BP's Deepwater Horizon rig from regulatory requirement

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 03:02 AM
Original message
Admin sheltered BP's Deepwater Horizon rig from regulatory requirement
Last year the Obama administration granted oil giant BP a special exemption from a legal requirement that it produce a detailed environmental impact study on the possible effects of its Deepwater Horizon drilling operation in the Gulf of Mexico, an article Wednesday in the Washington Post reveals...

The exemption came less than one month after BP had requested it in a March 10 "exploration plan" submitted to the MMS. The plan said that because a spill was "unlikely," no additional "mitigation measures other than those required by regulation and BP policy will be employed to avoid, diminish or eliminate potential impacts on environmental resources." BP also assured the MMS that any spill would not seriously hurt marine wildlife and that "due to the distance to shore (48 miles) and the response capabilities that would be implemented, no significant adverse impacts are expected..."

The Obama administration's delivery of a special exemption for Deepwater Horizon in April 2009 is the latest in a litany of examples that reveal the close collaboration between the MMS and BP.

Only 11 days before the explosion, BP requested a broadening of the April exemption, and in a separate letter dated September 14, 2009, a BP vice president for operations in the Gulf, Richard Morrison, requested that the Obama administration not put in place new guidelines that would have required audits of its rigs every three years. "We are not supportive of the extensive, prescriptive regulations as proposed in this rule," Morrison wrote. BP favored voluntary self-regulations, which, Morrison said, "have been and continue to be very successful..."

At the end of March, Obama announced a dramatic expansion of offshore drilling in Florida's Gulf waters, the Atlantic seaboard, and the northern waters of Alaska—basing himself largely on MMS claims that new drilling poses no major risks to the environment...

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2010/may2010/gulf-m06.shtml



The "voluntary self-regulation" thingee? They put the same type of thing into effect in the food/drug industry circa the 80s & we're seeing the results...

bacteria in meds, weird stuff in dog food, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 03:07 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, I'm sure they'll have a very good excuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
19. fuck everyone and I mean everyone who had a hand in this mess.
they should have to wash dying animals. with their tongues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 07:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. ++++++++
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hannah Bell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. kik
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w8liftinglady Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:46 PM
Response to Original message
3. Sorry-I have to say it-it's getter harder to defend the incestuous
relationships between oil,banking,insurance and OUR government-both sides of the aisle.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ipaint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Tony Podesta is one of the top lobbyist bundlers in washington. He bundles industry campaign
contributions for democrats. One of his major clients is BP.

Top Five Lobbyist Bundlers Revealed; Four Worked Exclusively for Democrats

Prolific lobbyist Anthony T. “Tony” Podesta, 65, ranks second on the list with $394,800 in bundled donations. One of GQ’s 2009 “50 Most Powerful People in D.C.”, Podesta is wired into the Democratic establishment — his brother John served as Bill Clinton’s White House chief of staff and more recently acted as President Barack Obama’s transition team co-chair while running the Center for American Progress, a left-leaning DC-based think-tank.Tony Podesta personally donated at least $84,750 to Democratic campaigns and committees this cycle alone, including a total of $50,000 donated to the DCCC. Over the same period, he bundled $142,900 for the DCCC and $102,000 to its sister Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee (DSCC). His wife, Heather, is a successful lobbyist in her own right and bundled another $25,000 to the DCCC and $79,750 to the DSCC respectively. Podesta also bundled $78,400 for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and $41,000 for Sen. Patty Murray. His numerous clients cover the gamut of major issues facing Congress, but Podesta has had an especially lucrative year lobbying on health reform — a recent Center investigation revealed Podesta’s firm had the fourth-largest number of clients concerned with the issue. Podesta’s office did not respond to a request for comment.

http://www.publicintegrity.org/articles/entry/2048 /


TPM's Tour Of The Oil Spill Flack Universe -- Who's On Damage Control?

Roll Call reported today (sub. req.) that London-based BP has five outside firms and is using social media to push the PR effort. Politico reported today that BP CEO Tony Hayward hosted Gulf Coast reporters for a Q&A session at the firm's Washington office.

Among the best-known BP reps in Washington is Tony Podesta, brother to former Clinton White House chief of staff John Podesta. Tony's The Podesta Group lobbies on behalf of BP. We asked their role in the oil spill and they referred all calls back to BP. But we know Podesta has the ear of the White House and of his brother's liberal and influential Center for American Progress.

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/05/oil_spill_damage_control_--_bp_has_wide_net_of_fir.php



NOAA warned the administration not to open up the offshore drilling because the ramifications/dangers were not clear.


"National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration officials last fall warned the Department of Interior, which regulates offshore oil drilling, that it was dramatically underestimating the frequency of offshore oil spills and was dangerously understating the risk and impacts a major spill would have on coastal residents.

NOAA is the nation's lead ocean resource agency, and the warnings came in its response to a draft of the Obama Administration's offshore oil drilling plans. The comments were Web-published in October by the whistle-blowing group, Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).

But NOAA's views were largely brushed aside as Obama went ahead and announced on March 31 that he would open vast swaths of American coastal waters to offshore drilling -- a plan now very much in doubt as a blown-out BP well in the Gulf of Mexico spews out an estimated 200,000 gallons of oil daily, for the 13th straight day."


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/03/noaa-warned-interior-was_n_561615.html

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
20. amen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Institutional inertia.
The people in charge of our business were hired by Reagan, two Bushes and the DLC. It is not surprising that they operate largely on autopilot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jxnmsdemguy65 Donating Member (481 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
5. Uh-oh...
This could spell real political trouble for Team Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
7. Here's a HuffPo piece on this:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/05/06/seadrill-other-controvers_n_566145.html

Here is what I find disturbing from the article:

"The recent accident of the Deepwater Horizon off the coast of Louisiana reminds us that even a highly regulated industry is not, unfortunately, immune to accidents," wrote S. Elizabeth Birnbaum, director of MMS, in her letter to Menendez."



WTF-even a highly regulated industry?



"The Deepwater rig lacked a remote-control shut-off switch, a back-up system that would close the well even if the rig above was destroyed.-snip The oil companies complained that the $500,000 devices were too expensive. Keep in mind the Deepwater was a $560 million rig. Countries like Norway and Brazil require these precautions to avert catastrophe, but in the US the technology is voluntary. This is thanks to a 2003 decision by the Bush administration's Minerals Management Service (MMS)"


http://motherjones.com/blue-marble/2010/05/bp-getting-heat-gulf-disaster

WHY AREN'T WE UP TO PAR W NORWAY & BRAZIL?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. S. Elizabeth Birnbaum exposed as an utter fraud
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. She wasn't even there when the exemption took place. She didn't take the job until July of 2009.
The MMS was already investigated by Earl Devaney. Anyone remember the sex and oil scandal there? The MMS is one messed up agency. And yes, Obama and co are to blame for not cleaning it up fast enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Just posted a thread on the scandal after a reminder from TPM:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x8285081

Still, her comment posted today calling the industry heavily regulated is troubling. Why should Norway & Brazil have strong safe guards than us? Certainly in her capacity she would have known this, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Why would they have stronger safeguards then us? Because since Reagan
govt. was evil and bad. And people voted for that crap. We do need more regulations. Liz Birnbaum is not really a political hack, she has a long career in govt. during the Clinton AND Bush administrations. Maybe too much group think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 02:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Her bio:
reads well. Maybe those free market clintonites & bushies spiked her water against regulation.

S. Elizabeth (Liz) Birnbaum assumed duties as Director of the Minerals Management Service (MMS) on July 15, 2009.

As MMS Director, Birnbaum administers programs that ensure the effective management of renewable energy, such as wind, wave, and ocean current energy; and traditional energy and mineral resources on the nation’s Outer Continental Shelf, including the environmentally safe exploration, development, and production of oil and natural gas, as well as the collection and distribution of revenues for minerals developed on federal and American Indian lands.

Before her appointment, she was staff director for the Committee on House Administration, where she oversaw strategy development, budget management and staff activities for the committee that manages legislative branch agencies. From 2001-2007, she was Vice President for Government Affairs and General Counsel for American Rivers, where she directed advocacy programs for the nation’s leading river conservation organization.

At the Department of the Interior, Birnbaum was Associate Solicitor for Mineral Resources from 2000 to 2001, supervising and managing a staff of attorneys that provided legal advice, developed regulations and conducted litigation on minerals issues for the Minerals Management Service, Bureau of Land Management, and Office of Surface Mining and Reclamation.

In addition, she was a special assistant to the Interior Solicitor, from 1999 to 2000, overseeing legal policy on a range of natural resource issues, including mining law, public land management and hydropower licensing. From 1991 to 1999 she was counsel to the House Committee on Natural Resources, where she handled legislative and oversight activities for the Department of the Interior, U.S. Forest Service, and electric power marketing administrations. From 1987 to 1991 she was counsel for the Water Resources Program of the National Wildlife Federation.

Birnbaum has been an officer and member of numerous boards and commissions, including the National Capital Section of the American Water Resources Association; Arlington County Environment and Energy Conservation Commission; and the Environment, Energy and Natural Resources Section of the District of Columbia Bar.

Birnbaum received her Juris Doctor from Harvard University in 1984 and her A.B. degree, magna cum laude, from Brown University in 1979. She was Editor in Chief of the Harvard Environmental Law Review, Vol. 8.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jennicut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. She does sound intelligent and has a lot of experience. It will take
time to clean up the mess that is the MMS. The director and deputy there under Bush wrecked the place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blindpig Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. and some think consistancy is a virtue.......


Shit, there ain't room in the henhouse for the chickens for all the foxes.

k&r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gov for sale Donating Member (29 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
9. ...reaching across the aisle on importantant issues... e.g. protecting interest of big oil?
...hoped for something more? ...not the change you had in mind?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
freddie mertz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 02:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. Uh-oh...not so good.
How much traction do we think this will get?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluebear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. Post a picture of Bo, stat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merkins Donating Member (309 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-06-10 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
17. Obama was the biggest recipient of BP cash...
BP and its employees have given more than $3.5 million to federal candidates over the past 20 years, with the largest chunk of their money going to Obama, according to the Center for Responsive Politics.

During his time in the Senate and while running for president, Obama received a total of $77,051 from the oil giant and is the top recipient of BP PAC.


http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0510/36783.html">More here


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC