Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Immigration Reform to Include Binational Gay Couples

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
JCMach1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 01:49 PM
Original message
Immigration Reform to Include Binational Gay Couples
Immigration reform is a hot-button issue in the United States. For many gay and lesbian Americans, the issue is particularly poignant, since same-sex partners do not qualify for residency or citizenship sponsorship under current law. But an outline for immigration reform legislation released last week by Senate Democrats would, if passed, change all that. Part of their platform for reform includes a provision allowing gay Americans to sponsor their partners for legal immigration.

The proposed framework includes elements of the Uniting American Families Act, which has been stalled in congress since last year. The framework reads, in part, "The proposal ... will eliminate discrimination in the immigration laws by permitting permanent partners of United States citizens and lawful permanent residents to obtain lawful permanent resident status." The Uniting American Families Act, which reads substantially the same, was originally submitted in 2009 by Senator Patrick Leahy of Vermont in the Senate and Representative Jerrold Nadler in the House. It has 122 cosponsors in the House and 23 in the Senate, and yet it has made no real movement toward passage in the year since its introduction. Now, there is at least some hope that equivalent legislation could pass as part of a more comprehensive immigration reform... http://www.realjock.com/article/1645
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mitchtv Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-05-10 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. change "to include" to
Edited on Wed May-05-10 01:53 PM by mitchtv
"would include" and it would be closer to the truth. "When pigs fly" would also work.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC