|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:17 PM Original message |
Ratigan is a 100% ReTHUG hack |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
eleny (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:19 PM Response to Original message |
1. What he finally got out of Bunning was that the Republicans have no plan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:22 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. Bunning is a deranged lunatic |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:21 PM Response to Original message |
2. He's a teabagger.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:22 PM Response to Original message |
3. I rarely, RARELY, disagree with you my dear malaise. Love you to death...BUT... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:30 PM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Fair and freaking balanced??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:32 PM Response to Reply #9 |
10. I have NEVER heard him say "Democrat Party". Let's see a video link |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walk away (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
14. I have heard him use it several times. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:38 PM Response to Reply #14 |
19. All his segments are archived on his website at MSNBC. GO FIND |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:42 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. You can like Dylan Ratigan, CNBC and Good Morning Joe superstar if you want, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:45 PM Response to Reply #25 |
30. corporate paid,corporate made |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:49 PM Response to Reply #30 |
36. Olberman and Rachel made themselves. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DJ13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:53 PM Response to Reply #36 |
43. No, Ratigan was on Bloomberg years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:47 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. Who do you trust, FC? BTW, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:51 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Not Dylan Ratigan.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:51 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. I'm changing the topic. WHO DO YOU TRUST, Frenchie? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walk away (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:53 PM Response to Reply #19 |
42. Sounds like torture to me. Don't believe us if he means that much to you.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:54 PM Response to Reply #42 |
44. That's what I thought. Thanks for playing. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:35 PM Response to Reply #10 |
15. Watching right now. He just said DemocratIC Party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Walk away (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:37 PM Response to Reply #15 |
17. He must have gotten the mssg. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:45 PM Response to Reply #3 |
29. Of course I still respect you Subdivisions |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cali_Democrat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
5. What was Ratigan saying? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:24 PM Original message |
He was trapping Bunning into admitting the thugs don't have a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:38 PM Response to Original message |
20. No....he simply agreed with Bunning that Republicans didn't vote for TARP...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:23 PM Response to Original message |
6. He talks too fast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue-Jay (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
7. No he isn't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:24 PM Response to Original message |
8. what a circle jerk....republicons don't do shit when they have the power, then they bitch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:33 PM Response to Original message |
11. He's right, the Dems' bill is a joke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:33 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. you've seen the bill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:36 PM Response to Reply #12 |
16. It doesn't break up the big banks, by their own admission, so it's a joke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tridim (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:38 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. There are planned amendments to deal with that.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:39 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. If it ain't a reinstatement of Glass-Steagall, it's not worth a fuck. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:42 PM Response to Reply #21 |
23. all or nothing? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:43 PM Response to Reply #23 |
27. Not nothing. Why not all? WE HAVE THE FUCKING MAJORITY ACROSS THE FUCKING BOARD! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sabrina 1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-28-10 01:19 AM Response to Reply #23 |
47. They got rid of Glass Steagall quickly enough didn't they? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:47 PM Response to Reply #21 |
32. I agree with you on this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-28-10 01:52 AM Response to Reply #21 |
49. Surprisingly, that's one of the proposed ammendments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:42 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. Yeah, right. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-28-10 02:08 AM Response to Reply #26 |
50. Cynicism. I get it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:41 PM Response to Reply #16 |
22. where's the text? that's not lawyerly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dorkulon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 04:00 PM Response to Reply #22 |
45. You're right, it would be more lawyerly to bury me in paperwork. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LiberalAndProud (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-28-10 01:49 AM Response to Reply #16 |
48. The SAFE amendment would, I think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:34 PM Response to Original message |
13. Exactly! I wondered how long folks would be enamored by him, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:42 PM Response to Original message |
24. Some of Ratigans biggest defenders used to be part of the Lou Dobbs fan club |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:45 PM Response to Reply #24 |
28. WRONG! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:46 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. Why you getting so defensive? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:48 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. Not defensive. Correcting you're sweeping accusation. Also, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:51 PM Response to Reply #34 |
38. Do I think you are lying? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Subdivisions (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:52 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. There you go, implying again, as if I am guilty of something. What am I guilty of, N? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:48 PM Response to Reply #24 |
35. As long as they hear what they want to hear, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 03:52 PM Response to Reply #35 |
40. I know. I have seen this movie before |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
harun (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Apr-27-10 04:20 PM Response to Reply #40 |
46. +1 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JI7 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Apr-28-10 02:11 AM Response to Original message |
51. i wish David Shuster was still there |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:16 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC