Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Key Expert Calls FBI's Theory About Accused Anthrax Terrorist 'Impossible'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 05:34 AM
Original message
Key Expert Calls FBI's Theory About Accused Anthrax Terrorist 'Impossible'

Key Expert Calls FBI's Theory About Accused Anthrax Terrorist 'Impossible'
Is the FBI prematurely closing the books on a still unsolved terror case?
April 25, 2010


A microbiologist who supervised the work of accused anthrax killer Bruce E. Ivins explained to a National Academy of Sciences panel Thursday why the arithmetic of growing anthrax didn't add up to Ivins' mailing deadly spores in fall 2001.

"Impossible," said Dr. Henry S. Heine of a scenario in which Ivins, another civilian microbiologist working for the Army, allegedly prepared the anthrax spores at an Army lab at Fort Detrick. Heine told the 16-member panel that Ivins would have had to grow as many as 10 trillion spores, an astronomical amount that couldn't have gone unnoticed by his colleagues.

According to FBI calculations, Ivins accomplished this working after-hours in a special suite for handling lethal agents designated B3, for Biohazard Level 3. A bar chart released by the bureau (PDF) when it closed its nearly 9-year-old Amerithrax case in February showed that in August and September 2001, the months immediately before the first anthrax letters were mailed, Ivins logged 34 more hours in the B3 suite than his combined total for the previous seven months.

"That's more than 8,000 hours (close to a year) short of what he would have needed to grow the anthrax," Heine told ProPublica in an interview after his NAS presentation.

Heine, one of the few scientists at the Army lab with the skills to grow large batches of anthrax, told ProPublica it would have taken around "100 liters of liquid anthrax culture," or more than 26 gallons, to grow all the dried spores that killed five Americans and infected 17 others.

"He couldn't have done that without us knowing it," said Heine.


more...

http://www.alternet.org/story/146614/key_expert_calls_fbi%27s_theory_about_accused_anthrax_terrorist_%27impossible%27_
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 05:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. The FBI lying?
Say it ain't so, Joe, Say it ain't so.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tom_paine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 05:54 AM
Response to Original message
2. Of course it's impossible, the Anthrax was a Bushie Op aimed at Democrats
now entirely successful.

1) The Bushies intimidated the Democrats, sent them a Mafia-style message, and got whatever they wanted from a cowed and compliant Democratic Party

2) Thanks to their control of Law Enforcement, the FBI investigation was tanked from the start, red herrings were followed, and a suitable patsy was found and driven to suicide or perhaps suicided like the DC Madam.

3) 99.9999% of the American Subject Populace will never ask any questions and never know any different except "the patsy did it".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. The man who published this photo was killed by Anthrax


And Pappy Bush had pledged there would be consequences.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Is that true? If so, wow. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Yes...
See:

What the Anthrax Targets tell us about the Anthrax Terrorist
http://www.newsgarden.org/columns/anthrax/anthraxtargets.shtml


And:

National Enquirer: No negative press for Bu$h since anthrax attack
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=104x469252



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 08:28 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Thanks for looking that up; I'm stunned. Never knew that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jtrockville Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 11:15 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. I'm with you babylonsister. Gotta go pick my jaw up off the floor now. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fumesucker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #5
9. Actually he was the *first* person killed by anthrax..
Edited on Tue Apr-27-10 08:37 AM by Fumesucker
He worked for a company called "American Media Inc".. Seriously.

One can be either a conspiracy theorist or a coincidence theorist..

Personally I'm a coincidence theorist because those conspiracy theorists are just whacked out. :crazy:

Oh, and Jenna Bush?

She's on the Today Show now.. :wow:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Selatius Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
3. I suspect if the American people found out the truth, people would stop voting.
The FBI is either that incompetent at finding the real culprit, or it's under tremendous pressure from certain individuals to doctor the results of the investigation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FormerDittoHead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Impossible. You'd as easily have the CIA produce false evidence of WMD's.
Oh wait. Are you saying that the same people who had the CIA (and the military, et. al.) produce "slam dunk" evidence of Iraqi WMD's could also have the FBI constantly direct its investigation to the wrong suspects, and then have them end the investigation when their lead "suspect" refused to take a small plane ride and instead committed suicide?

I'm all ready for the "logical and scientific" people here to start throwing out their "conspiracy kook" ridicule.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Festivito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 08:34 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. You mean they would stop voting Republican.
Only Democrats were to receive those letters.

The case was so-called closed only in the last days of Bush-Republican control.

The same FBI that would not let its agent look into the computer of the already in-custody 911 hijacker before 9/11. Because they could not risk losing a request sent to the FISA court. Yet, the FISA only rejected, what, four or five requests out of thousands. And, on those four or five they helped to get them passed.

It would appear that the FBI has anti-America infiltrators, and we need either an investigation or pitch forks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
11. why is it that we can agree some (many) events are fishy, but other events are sacred cows?
Edited on Tue Apr-27-10 08:58 AM by NightWatcher
I dont understand (wait, I really do, but for the sake of argument...) how many of us can agree that "dark forces" carried out some sinister events in our nation's history, but to suggest that similar or the same dark forces carried out others will instantly get one labeled a "wack job wing nut"?


JKF assassination..... definitely something fishy went on
MLK assassination..... maybe something fishy happened
Anthrax Attacks....... seems to have been something fishy


then

9/11 BOOM. THREAD LOCKED OR SENT AWAY. Poster is obviously insane!

or

maybe we didnt land on the Moon...BOOM! Poster is obviously insane!


We can grasp that dark forces within or outside of OUR government has done some evil things, but to possibly accept that they did others would crash our fragile little perceptions and open us up to questioning everything we thought we knew or held to be true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Doctor. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 09:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Well... I think out of all those,
the Moon Landing one doesn't really fit into the 'dark forces' category. Maybe 'gray forces'...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OnTheOtherHand Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
14. seriously?
I think that believers in a "moon landing hoax," "no plane" theories, etc. sometimes flatter themselves that they have a sort of existential courage that the rest of us lack ("crush our fragile little perceptions..."). Critics of evolutionary theory do the same thing.

It's actually not very scary to consider those possibilities. But embracing them does seem to entail filtering out a lot of disconfirming evidence for no obvious or compelling reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 09:24 AM
Response to Original message
13. K&R
Edited on Tue Apr-27-10 09:50 AM by suffragette

http://www.fredericknewspost.com/sections/news/display.htm?StoryID=104046
The NAS committee left after about half an hour of questioning Heine. Members already met twice to review FBI documents, and they expect a draft report to be ready by midsummer.

After the committee left, Heine expressed frustration that he had already told the FBI everything he just presented, but that no one had listened to him. FBI agents he dealt with were professional, he said, but some officials at the Department of Justice were extremely arrogant.

He said the whole investigation was filled with lies. Officials told different USAMRIID researchers their co-workers accused them of committing the attacks, just to see their reaction. They searched his vacation house and car without warrants.

They misled him about the questions they would ask him in front of a grand jury. And they tried to get him to seek a restraining order against Ivins, only days before he committed suicide, by saying Ivins had threatened to kill Heine during a group therapy session.



Interesting that the FBI pressured Heine to get a restraining order against Ivins, trying to use the info from Duley (who the FBI did persuade to get a restraining order. Looks like they were trying to get as many people as possible to do this to add to their "evidence."

For reference on Duley:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3724189
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobthedrummer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
15. k&r#17
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
16. I Happen To Know Several Well Connected MB's
Edited on Tue Apr-27-10 06:09 PM by Beetwasher
Specifically in this particular community and the scuttlebut is major cover up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
17. It's Amazing How Stupid The FBI Thinks most people are
Edited on Tue Apr-27-10 06:07 PM by fascisthunter
this is a cover-up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC