Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why won't Democrats force the Republicans to filibuster against the financial reform bill?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 05:58 PM
Original message
Why won't Democrats force the Republicans to filibuster against the financial reform bill?
Edited on Mon Apr-26-10 06:05 PM by Better Believe It
Was there a filibuster today or not and if not, why not?

I thought Senator Reid indicated he would force Senate Republicans to engage in a real filibuster against a bill.

Just bring a proposal to the Senate for debate, amendment and an up or down vote.

So what happened?

You need 60 cloture votes to end a Republican filibuster debate in order to begin a debate .... is that what happened on the floor of the Senate today?

Everyone understand that? In order to begin a debate you need to first end a filibuster debate against having a debate .... or something like that.

I haven't had time to read all of the details regarding the latest parliamentary tricks and manuvers so perhaps someone can explain what happened today .... in laymen's terms if possible.

:)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
1. The republicans filibustered the bill with 41 No votes and no debate can take place.
They won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And what Republicans took the Senate floor during that alleged filibuster?


Did he make the Republicans hold the Senate floor a week, a day, 6 hours, 5 minutes, 10 seconds before Senate Reid moved a cloture vote?

How long did it take?

I'm getting the impression this was one of those non-filibuster, phantom filibusters and Senator Reid was full of crap when he threatened to make the Republicans filibusters.

The Democratic majority in the Senate have the power to force an old fashioned "stay on the Senate floor" filibuster but the Democrats once again refuse to use it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. "Filibuster" has changed to be simply a vote against cloture. It's not "Mr Smith Goes to
Washington" anymore. I wish it were.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Unvanguard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. They actually don't. They need unanimous consent, or 60 votes, to open debate.
They got neither. There really isn't anything they can do about it, except wait for the Republican concession that seems to be in the works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. The Democrats can't do anything about the bogus filibuster. Yes they can!

They can force the Republicans to engage in a real filibuster on the floor of the Senate.

That much is very clear under Senate Rule 22.

Senator Reid admitted that during the health care debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 06:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Because when it comes down to it, they're relieved. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. The vote today was to start debate.
Starting debate requires 60 votes.

The Dems couldn't get 60 votes, so debate cannot start.

There was a 'filibuster', but only in the sense that debate cannot start on the bill. This wasn't a cloture vote to end debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Duplicate Deleted
Edited on Mon Apr-26-10 10:50 PM by Better Believe It

Deleted

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Better Believe It Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 10:48 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. So this was a cloture vote to start a debate!
Edited on Mon Apr-26-10 10:49 PM by Better Believe It
"This wasn't a cloture vote to end debate."

That gives a whole new meaning to the term "filibuster".

So the Republicans engaged in a phantom filibuster in order to prevent a vote to start a debate so that they would not have to engage in a filibuster to continue a debate by voting against cloture to end a debate.

Well, that makes perfect sense.

The Democrats can't control the Senate agenda and debate with a significant majority in the Senate but the Republicans can with only 41 Senators that represent less than 20% of the population of the United States.

Who won the 2008 election?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
branders seine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
7. that's their plan
they can pretend to do something without doing anything.

"See? We told you it wouldn't work. Excuse me, but now I have to go to the cocktail reception at the American Banking Institute."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 06:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Where there is no debate, there are no new bills being made about reform.
They can't decide if they want to secede or just bring the entire country down with them.
Gawd, I hate the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kentuck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-27-10 12:02 AM
Response to Original message
12. It's the new modern way to filibuster.
If it can't be debated, it can't be passed. They have to be willing to sacrifice and to bear the pain. Simply signing a statement saying that I don't want to debate this or that is nonsense. Let the Democrats bring it up for debate tomorrow and the next day. Let it go on for a couple of weeks just to educate the people about what is happening. Hammer the hell out of them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC