Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

ACLU's Eliasberg: A cross to bear - Arguing First Amendment case at the Supreme Court

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-26-10 04:20 PM
Original message
ACLU's Eliasberg: A cross to bear - Arguing First Amendment case at the Supreme Court
Last October, I argued a case in front of the U.S. Supreme Court that revolves around whether a cross in the Mojave Desert violates the First Amendment prohibition on government favoritism toward any religion. The court has still not issued a decision, although one could come at any time. But the intervening six months have given me plenty of time to reflect on the experience of making my first-ever appearance in front of our nation's highest court, and about an interesting exchange that I had with Justice Antonin Scalia...

The case, Salazar v. Buono, is a complicated one that juggles many issues. Lower courts had already decided that the placement of the cross on federal property violated the First Amendment, and that decision became final in 2004. One of the key remaining issues was whether that violation would be meaningfully eradicated by the government's proposal to transfer ownership of the small patch of land on which the cross stands to a local veteran's group — even though the cross would remain designated a national memorial...

It's hard to know if Justice Scalia was grandstanding when he asked me, incredulously, on what I based my view that a Latin cross does not represent all veterans. I didn't want to be disrespectful, but I did think to myself, “I can't believe he's asking me this.” Scalia, a devout Catholic, was suggesting that the Latin cross was some sort of nonreligious, universal symbol. Yet thousands of Jews, Muslims, Buddhists and members of other faiths who have served their country with honor do not regard the cross in this way. I had to respond, so I said, “Justice Scalia … I have been in Jewish cemeteries. There is never a cross on a tombstone of a Jew.” ...

When the oral arguments were over, I first kissed my wife, Catherine, then hugged my son. Then we went to lunch with some friends and associates. Believe me, after the morning I'd had, I wasn't going to have a cup of tea. I had a stiff gin and tonic. And then the waiting began.

http://www.mydesert.com/article/20100409/COLUMNS26/4090343/1026/news12/A-cross-to-bear-Arguing-First-Amendment-case-at-the-Supreme-Court


This case could be released very soon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC