Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why don’t Dems speak out like Ron Paul on Iran: A Vote For Sanctions is a Vote For War

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
jody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 10:36 AM
Original message
Why don’t Dems speak out like Ron Paul on Iran: A Vote For Sanctions is a Vote For War
Statement of Congressman Ron Paul on Motion to Instruct Conferees on HR 2194, Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability and Divestment Act
Mr. Speaker, I rise in opposition to this motion to instruct House conferees on HR 2194, the Comprehensive Iran Sanctions, Accountability and Divestment Act, and I rise in strong opposition again to the underlying bill and to its Senate version as well. I object to this entire push for war on Iran, however it is disguised. Listening to the debate on the Floor on this motion and the underlying bill it feels as if we are back in 2002 all over again: the same falsehoods and distortions used to push the United States into a disastrous and unnecessary one trillion dollar war on Iraq are being trotted out again to lead us to what will likely be an even more disastrous and costly war on Iran. The parallels are astonishing.

We hear war advocates today on the Floor scare-mongering about reports that in one year Iran will have missiles that can hit the United States. Where have we heard this bombast before? Anyone remember the claims that Iraqi drones were going to fly over the United States and attack us? These “drones” ended up being pure propaganda – the UN chief weapons inspector concluded in 2004 that there was no evidence that Saddam Hussein had ever developed unpiloted drones for use on enemy targets. Of course by then the propagandists had gotten their war so the truth did not matter much.

We hear war advocates on the floor today arguing that we cannot afford to sit around and wait for Iran to detonate a nuclear weapon. Where have we heard this before? Anyone remember then-Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice’s oft-repeated quip about Iraq: that we cannot wait for the smoking gun to appear as a mushroom cloud.

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Let us remember a few important things. Iran, a signatory of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, has never been found in violation of that treaty. Iran is not capable of enriching uranium to the necessary level to manufacture nuclear weapons. According to the entire US Intelligence Community, Iran is not currently working on a nuclear weapons program. These are facts, and to point them out does not make one a supporter or fan of the Iranian regime. Those pushing war on Iran will ignore or distort these facts to serve their agenda, though, so it is important and necessary to point them out.

Obama has the authority to bring our troops home from Iraq and Afghanistan immediately and to derail the coming attack on Iran.

He should do that and use the billions saved to fight the war we are losing against poverty, education, and other domestic needs of We the People.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
1. I hate when I agree with Ron Paul but with regard to Warmongering around the World ...
and only THAT, we concur. :blush:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ron Paul, give me a break
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
3. They should. Tell 'em to. Call, email and visit yours regularly, please.
NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Apr-24-10 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. No response. Typical. "Why don't THEYYYYY do something??..." Not, "How can I help?"
:eyes:

NGU.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mari333 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. many dems are owned by the corporate shills who garner profit from warmongering
not much different then the repubs on that one
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
5. So yesterday you post a teabagger's rant against gov. lending for student loans and an OP about how
Edited on Fri Apr-23-10 10:43 AM by SemiCharmedQuark
we should be for less government and today you're promoting Ron Paul?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zen Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 10:42 AM
Response to Original message
6. Please don't confuse Ron Paul's opposition to war with principles other than greed.
He simply doesn't want to pay taxes for war. That's his only point of view. He wants to keep every nickel he makes for himself.

Pitiful little man, who makes all his campaign cash from the chemical industry, and who happens to be my so-called representative in Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ozymanithrax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 10:48 AM
Response to Original message
7. A vote for sanctions is not an authorization to use force in Iran under the war powers act...
Edited on Fri Apr-23-10 10:48 AM by Ozymanithrax
Ron Paul knows that, So, Ron Paul is wrong and a liar.

A vote for sanctions limits capitalist free market money making when it comes to Iran.

Now we see why Ron Paul opposes Sanctions. It isn't about war, it's about capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. Sanctions are one of the few options we have to influence Iran to NOT
develop a weapons program. Ron Paul is not a peacenik, he's an isolationist wackaloon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-23-10 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. "wackaloon" LOL
It is always "interesting" when DU'ers start promoting the guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC