Eliot Spitzer for Supreme Court!

[Rage Inc.]

So he likes hookers. Big deal! That's an issue for his rabbi, not the Senate. On a SCOTUS that recently declared corporations to be persons, we NEED a Spitzer!

(And can you imagine the laughs we'd get over the Republicans tut-tutting his sexual behavior?????)

[Dappleganger]

1. .

:popcorn:

[MadBadger]

2. We need A Spitzer. Just not the man himself.

[rug]

3. The confirmation hearings will be entertaining.

[rcrush]

4. I agree 100% with this post.

[Demoiselle]

5. He'd be great. And the Repukes would implode. nt

[onehandle]

6. He would be great, but like Elizabeth Warren, I'd rather keep him more on camera.

They are both passionate, clear communicators.

(Eliot, a little too passionate on the side)

[CTyankee]

7. Uh, no....

All I can tell you is "black socks." :rofl:

[Rage Inc.]

9. David Vitter

'nuff said!

[CTyankee]

14. IOKIYAR, sadly...

[DoBotherMe]

8. They may let him pass since

they may not want to to stir up their own dirty sediment. Dana ; )

[whistler162]

10. NTSA....

[Bitwit1234]

11. CNN just posted an article

the three people are in contention and Kagan is the one they suppose. What in the S.O.B hell is wrong with Obama. Isn't the court too damn far to the right now. She should be taken out of the list for good. We need more liberal judges. And if he doesn't give us one this country will really fall off the map. Flood the damn phones, emails, letters and tell him to get off putting her anywhere near the court.

[Rage Inc.]

12. CNN is full of shit!

At this point they can't accurately predict that the Sun will rise tomorrow!

[cali]

13. ridiculous.

he could NEVER get confirmed. His sexual behavior was illegal.

Furthermore, this mindless shit about how only this person or that will do for the SCOTUS is lame.

[whistler162]

17. His sexual behavior was the least of his problems...

Given it was the last straw in the collapse of his being Governor but it was the least of his problems!

[nyc 4 Biden]

19. +1

[ecstatic]

15. hell no. It's not as simple as you put it

The man has serious character flaws.

[Rage Inc.]

16. Name a man with NO character flaws!

I sure as hell ain't one of 'em! And we have bigger things to worry about than where a guy is dipping his wick! Would you have disqualified Bill Clinton for the Presidency? I'm not aware that he ever employed a hooker, but there's no doubt that he's a flawed man. I knew that in '92 and '96, and voted for him enthusiastically both times.

[Toucano]

21. Character flaws? ROFL!

That's like saying WWII was a "disagreement". LOL!

Bill Clinton's "character flaws" were not illegal, by the way.

[Johonny]

18. He'd probably be a better AG or Governor of NY oops

[Toucano]

20. Why not just nominate John Edwards?

I mean, if you're looking for a philandering, two-timing, lying, whore mongering criminal with a law degree and a serious lack of good judgement - which you must be to suggest Spitzer.

[FarCenter]

22. We could have well illustrated hearings

Ashley Alexandra Dupre's Playboy Shoot: First Look at New York's Most Dangerous Rack

http://blogs.villagevoice.com/runninscared/archives/2010/04/alexandra_ashle.php

[Rage Inc.]

23. Kickin' for the Night Owls

I'm not kidding: I want him on the Court!

[MajorChode]

24. He wouldn't be the biggest lecher on the court

At least so long as Thomas is around. That bar has already been set pretty low.