Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Deal Safety Net Not Catching Today's Middle Class

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 09:13 PM
Original message
New Deal Safety Net Not Catching Today's Middle Class
"The social safety net established as part of the New Deal in the 1930s is missing a huge swath of today's middle class, according to a new report by the Freelancers Union.

"The middle class is no longer made up of those blue-collar factory workers you think of from 50 years ago," said Althea Erickson of the Freelancers Union, a New York nonprofit that provides benefits to members across the country. "The new middle class are software developers, they're bloggers, they're psychologists, they're graphic designers. They're these workers that make up our membership and they really are driving the economy at this point."

According to the Government Accountability Office, there were 42.6 million "contingent workers" -- freelancers -- comprising 31 percent of the total American workforce in 2005.

Eighty-nine percent of the more than 3,000 freelancers who answered the survey said that they faced periods either without enough work or no work at all in 2009. By comparison, in 2006 freelancers found full employment at a 10-percent higher rate than this past year."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/04/13/new-deal-safety-net-not-c_n_535634.html


No one seems to be talking much about this - neither the pundits or the politicians - I know this article pretty accurately describes what's been happening to my wife and I these last two years - just curious to know if any other DUers find themselves in this position - unable to collect unemployment insurance, unable to find enough work to pay the bills, running out of savings, cashed in mutual funds, 401k's, etc - running out of time and hope that the "recovery" is going to happen in time to save us from losing what we've worked our entire lives for...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 09:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. Absolutely! And don't forget, higher health insurance costs!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
awoke_in_2003 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 09:21 PM
Response to Original message
2. It is not a net anymore....
we have been cutting holes in it since 1980
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
3. Well, it doesn't help that there's been a bipartisan effort to shred the social safety net
Going back thirty years now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 09:26 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well the New Deal never did catch the self-employed
unless you pay your own unemployment insurance, which you are certainly free to do. You can also apply for food stamps, energy assistance, in some states health care, and the other benefits from the Great Society; same as the folks who are collecting unemployment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. it seems to me that the point of the article is that things have
changed since the New Deal safety net was devised. Self employed people make up a far larger percentage of the population now...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 10:09 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Well they count the neighborhood lawn guy now
Or someone selling their clothes on Ebay. In the past, those folks would have been considered either unemployed or not in the labor market at all. I don't know how reliable those numbers are.

Regardless, no matter how many self-employed people there are, they still have access to a safety net. As bad off as some of them may be, I'd be the majority is still making more than they would on unemployment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. I really find that a weak argument
but I don't feel like arguing with you about it

whatever
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amborin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-10 10:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:41 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC