|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 09:37 PM Original message |
John Edwards just lost my support. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
buff2 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
1. I think everyone should get out of the race that I don't support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 09:43 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Uhhh... the OP said he/she doesn't support Edwards anymore |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Der Blaue Engel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:24 PM Response to Reply #2 |
36. Actually, the OP said |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 11:04 AM Response to Reply #36 |
112. And the OP is entitled to his/her opinion. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 09:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
4. I am saying, "shame on you John" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
msongs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 09:45 PM Response to Original message |
3. wasn't this posted here a few days ago? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 09:47 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. sorry, I was working, I did not see it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
illinoisprogressive (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 09:51 PM Response to Original message |
6. I'm an Obama supporter and I urge you first to write to Edwards and express your disappointment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 09:52 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. I've done it already, I wanted answers before I exploded |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:16 PM Response to Reply #6 |
23. "rash decision" is a decision to support somebody who knew the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:48 PM Response to Reply #6 |
50. he's got good reasons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Schema Thing (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
8. Good for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 09:56 PM Original message |
Deleted message |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
12. I had been a supporter of Edwards. I praised him while attacking others |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:02 PM Response to Reply #12 |
14. Yes............. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:05 PM Response to Reply #14 |
16. :) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:14 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. here's a screenshot from my email confirming my registration to his blog |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 03:48 PM Response to Reply #14 |
143. Way to corner the dissenter! Got yer torches? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zensea (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:03 PM Response to Original message |
15. bwahahaha |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 03:49 PM Response to Reply #15 |
144. Apparently, the poster you praise so much got embarrassed...or banned. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 06:53 AM Response to Original message |
89. Deleted message |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 09:56 PM Response to Original message |
9. The Edwards campaign has struck home with a lot of the county |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 11:05 AM Response to Reply #9 |
114. God help us if he is. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
10. So you want a president who will never admit when he's wrong? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:00 PM Response to Reply #10 |
13. I want someone who does what's right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:19 PM Response to Reply #13 |
28. Ahhh, one who never makes mistakes. Thanks for clearing that up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:21 PM Response to Reply #10 |
31. Edwards took years to admit what all of us KNEW was a bad vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ClassWarrior (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 11:23 PM Response to Reply #31 |
58. Run. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 04:28 PM Response to Reply #10 |
152. It's not that he was wrong...it was that he voted FOR something he KNEW was a lie... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 09:58 PM Response to Original message |
11. We Are Where We Are... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NNN0LHI (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:07 PM Response to Reply #11 |
17. I also thought at the time that although Iraq was not a threat to us... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:31 PM Response to Reply #17 |
40. Damn That Hindsight |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Skip Intro (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:10 PM Response to Original message |
18. I agree, but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
19. Was Edwards on the Intelligence Committee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:15 PM Response to Reply #19 |
21. couldnt he come out and say, "these are lies" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lochloosa (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 12:37 PM Response to Reply #21 |
125. No, he could not. But he could have voted against the war. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 01:00 PM Response to Reply #125 |
126. If he had any guts he would have come out and said these were lies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connie_Corleone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:17 PM Response to Reply #19 |
25. Yes, Edwards was on the Intelligence Committee. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:34 PM Response to Reply #25 |
43. Didn't know...I guess he needs to talk a little more about his vote in light of Durbin's comments. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 11:34 PM Response to Reply #43 |
60. Oh, I'm sure he'll do the tapdance. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:19 PM Response to Reply #19 |
29. Absolutely. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Mass (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:34 PM Response to Reply #19 |
44. Yes.\nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:39 PM Response to Reply #19 |
48. The big point is that he knew more than the others and STILL voted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 11:55 PM Response to Reply #19 |
64. Yes, he was. Here is the list: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:15 PM Response to Original message |
22. Aren't You Letting Edwards Off Easy? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Connie_Corleone (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:16 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Don't forget Edwards voted NO on the Durbin and Levin amendments to the IWR. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:37 PM Response to Reply #24 |
46. Great Catch! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:53 PM Response to Reply #24 |
51. Please tell me more about that vote. Just another nail in Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madmunchie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:53 PM Response to Reply #24 |
52. Self Delete Dup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
26. I didn't need Durbin to tell me that. I already assumed it was true. I support Edwards. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 07:43 AM Original message |
He was elected in 1998, fall 2002 more than half way into his one and only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 07:43 AM Response to Reply #26 |
91. self delete - dup |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rosemary2205 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #26 |
146. My question is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 08:08 PM Response to Reply #146 |
156. The Courthouse, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 08:08 PM Response to Reply #26 |
157. You know it's very strange |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Colobo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:18 PM Response to Original message |
27. Edwards is a good man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OHdem10 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:20 PM Response to Original message |
30. Why is it that so many especially at Fox News |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:22 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Now I'm being compared to OReally? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:32 PM Response to Reply #33 |
42. It's Astonishing What One Can Be Accused Of... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:34 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. I was just accused of always swinging things to the right |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Gloria (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:22 PM Response to Original message |
32. He seems to have consulted Clinton Admin people.....and we know now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trudyco (975 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
34. So were the Dems on the Intelligence Committee getting the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rose Siding (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 07:02 AM Response to Reply #34 |
90. At Inslee's townhall meeting, he mentioned a room that held the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 07:55 AM Response to Reply #90 |
93. Durbin and Graham both explained this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rose Siding (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 08:03 AM Response to Reply #93 |
94. Then Inslee was even underwhelmed by the finished "product" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 11:16 AM Response to Reply #94 |
120. That's the old it was a vote for war - |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rose Siding (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 07:22 AM Response to Reply #120 |
159. I know the language in the res, as do the dems who regret their vote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Le Taz Hot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 11:16 AM Response to Reply #93 |
121. And yet, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:24 PM Response to Original message |
35. There's abiding loyalty to him. The people who know him say so, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:29 PM Response to Reply #35 |
37. I never said he was not a good father. I said he should have acted differently surrounding the war |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:38 PM Response to Reply #37 |
47. I take a different path to our nominees. And to our representatives generally. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 11:50 PM Response to Reply #47 |
62. Well said Old Crusoe! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saltpoint (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 12:11 AM Response to Reply #62 |
65. Hi, Old and In the Way, and I followed your post there with respect, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 01:03 PM Response to Reply #65 |
127. One way to do that is impeachment, and yet, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madfloridian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
38. So many posts bashing Edwards.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NightWatcher (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:31 PM Response to Reply #38 |
41. I'm not against him, I only said that I no longer support him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:41 PM Response to Reply #38 |
49. Ya Know... This Isn't EVER Going To Stop No Matter What You Say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 01:05 PM Response to Reply #38 |
128. You reap what you sow. You can support him all you want. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 10:30 PM Response to Original message |
39. I'm sure he's crushed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fortyfeetunder (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 11:00 PM Response to Original message |
53. Not so fast |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GreenArrow (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 11:30 PM Response to Reply #53 |
59. more accuarately |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jen4clark (812 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 11:10 PM Response to Original message |
54. Good on you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 11:21 PM Response to Original message |
55. You're doing the right thing. Edwards doesn't deserve the nomination; he hasn't earned it. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 12:14 AM Response to Reply #55 |
66. And others have? Geez .Give it a rest> |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clarkie1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
56. Apparently Edwards cares more about his hair than integrity. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
w4rma (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 02:07 AM Response to Reply #56 |
85. Apparently *you* care more about hair than integrity. Hair is your favorite topic. (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Puglover (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu May-03-07 07:40 AM Response to Reply #85 |
160. My question is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 11:26 AM Response to Reply #56 |
123. Sour grapes? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
57. These 'concern' threads about Edwards just recycle every few days... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HardRocker05 (486 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 11:45 PM Response to Original message |
61. They all knew. They betrayed America. The whole episode has been a disgrace to America. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Fields (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 01:14 PM Response to Reply #61 |
130. Thank you, thank you, thank you. Finally, someone around here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue May-01-07 11:52 PM Response to Original message |
63. It's not that Edwards didn't share the info, but that it didn't STOP him from co-sponsoring |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 12:15 AM Response to Reply #63 |
67. To quote Biden. "Yes". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 12:26 AM Response to Reply #67 |
68. I so hope there's a joke in here, somewhere - the Biden name gives me hope... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 12:38 AM Response to Reply #68 |
69. I was undecided as to my support of a particular candidate until today. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 12:44 AM Response to Reply #69 |
70. With that attitude, we should all be Hillary fans. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 12:45 AM Response to Reply #70 |
71. ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 12:53 AM Response to Reply #70 |
73. It would be nice if we could support all our candidates without |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 01:01 AM Response to Reply #73 |
76. I agree it is honorable to admit that you are wrong. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
saracat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 02:06 AM Response to Reply #76 |
84. My point was the one with no vote had nothing to lose! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 12:53 AM Response to Reply #69 |
72. Boy, that was easy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bling bling (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 01:05 AM Response to Reply #72 |
77. It is easy. Isn't that how everyone chooses their candidate? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Freddie Stubbs (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 06:16 AM Response to Reply #63 |
88. Perhaps he just interpreted the information differently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 12:54 AM Response to Original message |
74. I'm not an Edwards supporter in the first place, but it's a lot more complicated than that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cameron27 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 12:58 AM Response to Reply #74 |
75. You know, I could agree with you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 01:06 AM Response to Reply #75 |
78. The others wouldn't have passed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 01:10 AM Response to Reply #78 |
80. But why not vote for it......no matter if it would or would not pass? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 01:18 AM Response to Reply #80 |
81. Hm. Yeah, that's a good point. I didn't see what you meant at first.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FrenchieCat (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 01:09 AM Response to Reply #74 |
79. So Edwards did not support the Levin and Durbin Amendments |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 01:25 AM Response to Reply #79 |
82. I agree, I may be wrong about his motivations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 08:19 AM Response to Reply #82 |
97. Kerry spoke out against rushing to war on January 23, 2003 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 01:52 AM Response to Reply #74 |
83. You should post this in a thread of its own. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadBadger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 03:24 AM Response to Reply #74 |
86. I believe this is what Biden was trying to say on MTP on Sunday. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 08:22 AM Response to Reply #86 |
98. Exactly - and Biden was one actively working on an |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
karynnj (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 08:07 AM Response to Reply #74 |
95. That argument would work better if they would have spoken |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 01:22 PM Response to Reply #95 |
131. Which argument? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaPera (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 03:51 AM Response to Original message |
87. Surprise surprise...Give us ...uh...who's your favorite...you owe us that! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 07:48 AM Response to Original message |
92. hey durbin...FUCK the "rules"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 08:17 AM Response to Original message |
96. What Durbin said doesn't make any sense. Even KO said it didn't make sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 09:00 AM Response to Original message |
99. These Anti-Edwards posts tell us more about the posters than about Edwards... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 10:56 AM Response to Reply #99 |
109. Damn anti-Edwards people and their obsessions with war and how it was started! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 11:13 AM Response to Reply #109 |
116. "Helped start it"...uh, the war started WITHOUT any help at all from Congress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 03:33 PM Response to Reply #116 |
138. What good did their "No" do? A lot for their conscience, credibility, the fact that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 01:38 PM Response to Reply #109 |
133. Actually his statement you quoted here is TRUE.... but will you acknowledge the truth??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #99 |
117. Very Well Said... Unfortunately... Too Many Here ARE Shooting Our |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 11:24 AM Response to Reply #117 |
122. "NOTHING would EVER have stopped them from the INVASION!" BINGO!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ChiciB1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 11:33 AM Response to Reply #122 |
124. Thank You... n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 04:12 PM Response to Reply #99 |
151. There are concern trolls here on DU. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blackhatjack (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 08:02 PM Response to Reply #151 |
155. You are so right --- same posters, same concerns, recycled and regurgitated....n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Matsubara (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 09:07 AM Response to Original message |
100. The intelligence was not faulty, it was fraudulent... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bigwillq (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 09:09 AM Response to Original message |
101. Read "The Italian Letter" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PhilipDC (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 09:40 AM Response to Reply #101 |
103. Edwards floor speech |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
insane_cratic_gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 09:28 AM Response to Original message |
102. I'm guessing but I bet you never supported him |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 10:14 AM Response to Reply #102 |
105. OP was on issues - gets personal attacks (proven wrong). You are some lock step |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hobarticus (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #105 |
119. Where's the attack? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 03:38 PM Response to Reply #119 |
140. Several people asked proof of his/her prior support - questioning credibility |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
insane_cratic_gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 01:27 PM Response to Reply #105 |
132. I'm not attacking anyone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 03:42 PM Response to Reply #132 |
141. Bit early for nose holding. Now you get to chose. Not much, but honest people |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
insane_cratic_gal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 06:13 PM Response to Reply #141 |
153. Obama is very celebrated in the media |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 04:09 PM Response to Reply #105 |
149. Who are you? A "concerned" tag-team partner? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
snot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 10:00 AM Response to Original message |
104. I don't see how anyone who really cared whether the intelligence was sufficient |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 10:17 AM Response to Original message |
106. Edwards lied to us in 2005 too, in his "apology" - saying "he didn't know" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 10:44 AM Response to Reply #106 |
107. Where did he lie? Do you have any proof or just accusations? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 10:52 AM Response to Reply #107 |
108. He sure told Tweety he knew differently from that commitee: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 10:56 AM Response to Reply #108 |
110. So your saying that there was no "disconnect between what we were told and what, in fact, we found" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 11:03 AM Response to Reply #110 |
111. I am saying that it was NOT the info they had in that committee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 11:05 AM Response to Reply #111 |
113. So you are saying that they were not shown info that said Iraq had WMD in the committee? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 11:12 AM Response to Reply #113 |
115. Dumb or evil? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 11:15 AM Response to Reply #115 |
118. He didn't lie and that is evident. He, unlike the guy in the WH is not a liar and he apologized. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 01:39 PM Response to Reply #118 |
134. THE APOLOGY WAS THE LIE! "I DIDN'T KNOW". Which Edwards do you believe? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 01:56 PM Response to Reply #134 |
136. The facts are that he was shown both sides and you ignore that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 03:27 PM Response to Reply #136 |
137. About 3000 lives cheap (and I am not talking of Iraqis either). DUMB then. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 03:35 PM Response to Reply #137 |
139. The IWR vote he made is NOT a cheap political point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 03:45 PM Response to Reply #139 |
142. Not just vote, sponsorship. many versions of the "why" bring the question: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsamuel (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 03:53 PM Response to Reply #142 |
145. I asked you in a previous reply to show me where he "lied": |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cooolandrew (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 01:10 PM Response to Original message |
129. Let's be honest here they all must of known, but with Barack he wasn't in the senate or Richardson.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 01:43 PM Response to Reply #129 |
135. So, he lied, but he gives good ad - so who cares? Wow! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krkaufman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
147. Of course, who's to say that Durbin's statement wasn't politically motivated...? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
brentspeak (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 04:08 PM Response to Original message |
148. Thanks for your "concern" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 04:10 PM Response to Original message |
150. I'm Sure He's Just Heartbroken. Thank You For Your Concern. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Truth2Tell (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 07:53 PM Response to Original message |
154. I really want to support Edwards |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mzmolly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed May-02-07 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
158. I think people are over-blowing Durbin's statements? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 08:02 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC