Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scott Brown begs for 2012 campaign contributions to help stop a Senator Rachel Maddow

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:36 AM
Original message
Scott Brown begs for 2012 campaign contributions to help stop a Senator Rachel Maddow
Edited on Wed Mar-24-10 10:42 AM by SemiCharmedQuark

Sen. Scott Brown (R-MA) is asking voters to donate to his 2012 campaign so a certain "liberal MSNBC anchor" who lives in Western Massachusetts won't win the office instead. "Rachel Maddow has a nightly platform to push her far-left agenda," Brown writes in a fundraising letter. "What about you?"

Brown says the Massachusetts Democrats may be trying to recruit her.


http://maddowblog.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2010/03/24/4062077-maddow-im-not-running-for-office

Friends,

It’s only been a couple of months since I’ve been in office, and before I’ve even settled into my new job, the political machine in Massachusetts is looking for someone to run against me. And you’re not going to believe who they are supposedly trying to recruit — liberal MSNBC anchor Rachel Maddow.

Rachel lives in western Massachusetts, and recently it was reported that the chairman of the state Democratic Party had apparently tried to reach out to her in an attempt to coax her into a race against me. You can read about it here.

The political season never ends, which is why I need your continued support. While my opponents strategize on how to defeat me in 2012, I’m going to continue to speak out against higher taxes, more spending and greater government control in our lives.

I relish being an independent voice in Washington, one that doesn’t march in lockstep with the rest of the Washington crowd. The Democratic Party bosses in Massachusetts disagree. They want a rubberstamp who will vote for their plans to expand government, increase debt and raise taxes. Someone like Rachel Maddow. I’m sure she’s a nice person — I just don’t think America can afford her liberal politics.

Rachel Maddow has a nightly platform to push her far-left agenda. What about you? I’d like to encourage ordinary American citizens concerned about the future of their country to get more involved in our government. I hope you were encouraged by my victory to become more politically active, maybe even become a candidate for office yourself. We can continue to push our movement forward by running for office, joining in rallies and petitions that challenge President Obama and Nancy Pelosi’s healthcare legislation, supporting campaigns against the tax-and-spenders or by donating time and money to office-holders and candidates who will restore the principles of our founders.

I’m grateful you are with me. Thanks again for whatever support you can provide me, and I look forward to joining in further victories with you down the line.

Sincerely,

Scott Brown
United States Senator

http://washingtonindependent.com/80165/scott-brown-help-me-defeat-rachel-maddow-who-might-run-against-me-according-to-twitter

Apparently he got this fact straight from his ass. Too bad, Rachel would be a fantastic senator.

Edited to include entire Scott Brown begging letter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bigtree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
1. he's got the making-shit-up part of being a republican senator down pat
He ought to rack up quite a large collection of bullshit before his appointed term is over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. This dink has barely been there for a month and he thinks he's really something.
Edited on Wed Mar-24-10 10:40 AM by TheCowsCameHome
What an asshole.

What a republican.

That's redundant, isn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Apparently he got it off a Twitter feed.
Republicans are crap fact checkers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Winterblues Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
4. I love her where she is but she would make a damn fine Senator.
It is no wonder Brown uses her to fund raise. She has influence and is a great danger to hypocrites..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CoffeeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:44 AM
Response to Original message
5. The only way the Republicans win...
...is striking fear in the hearts of total imbiciles.

There's a big population of imbiciles from which to tap, so never
underestimate their outrageous and inaccurate assertions.

Many gullible simpletons eat this slop up and hang on their
every word. Look at the popularity of Beck.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. True. Unfortunately I just had a conversation w/ my cousin wherein he spouted off
just about every talking point Brown nails here. It's like Colbert said: RW talking point bingo

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. "Senator Rachel Maddow" ...
Me likey.

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Happyhippychick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Hell yes on that. She would win in an uber landslide.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 06:25 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. She has a lot MORE power where she is right now.. I hope she stays put
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Happyhippychick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yeah I've got to agree with you on that. What was I thinking?
I would miss her if she left her show! :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Her show is the best.
I really do like keith, but I recommend Rachel's show to everybody. She's so calm and thorough. She destroys arguments quietly without shouting and takes on anyone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
9. He could be making a big mistake opening this kettle of fish.
I wonder if she would ever consider it? She would absolutely win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. She says she won't, but who knows?
I think she'd be a great senator.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Walk away Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. That would kill John Boehner. He would drop on the spot. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deacon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-24-10 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
15. Lying his way into office. How family valueish. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC